Srila Prabhupada: Islam is also Vaishnavism.
Dr. Patel: Mohammedanism is not Vaishnavism.
Srila Prabhupada: No, no. Chaitanya Mahaprabhu talked with the Pathanas (Muslims). He proved that “Your religion is Vaishnavism.” (Morning walk. Bombay, 17/02/74)
Srila Prabhupada: Then Islam is Vaishnava dharma (religion) in a crude form like Christianity.
(Room conversation. Tehran, 14/03/75)
In these two Statements, Srila Prabhupada explains that the Isamic religion is also teaching how to become a servant of only one God and surrender to Him with love and devotion. One can cultivate the same knowledge in the Vaishnava religion but with more detailed information. In Vaishnavism, one can learn how to develop his eternal loving relationships with the Supreme Lord. Although Dr. Patel could not accept that Islam is also Vaishnavism, Srila Prabhupada explained that Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, in his conversation with the Pathana Muslims, proved by quoting from the Holy Qur’an that Islam is also Vaishnavism. At the end of his conversation all the Pathana Muslims, including the great Muslim Scholar and prince Vijuli Khan, accepted the fact that Vaishavism is a true religion teaching complete surrender to the will and desire of God, which is the meaning of Islam. Later on in 197S, in Tehran, Srila Prabhupada explained that Islam is a simplified form of the Vaishnava religion. Why? Because the Holy Prophet Muhammad taught his people according to time, place, circumstances and their intellectual level. He himself clearly said, “I received two kinds of knowledge: one of these I taught — but if I had taught them the other, it would have broken their necks.” (Nadarbeg K. Mizra, Reincarnation and Islam, Madras, 1927, p. 4)
–
A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada on ISLAM
Ravanari Das, Ph.D.
DKBT – THE DABIR KHAS BOOK TRUST
“Certainly God will send to my sect at the end of every hundred years,
a person who will renew my religion.” (Prophet Muhammad)
“Chaitanya Mahaprabhu proved devotional Service from the Qur’an.
So it requires a devotee who can explain God from any godly literature.”
(Srila Prabhupada)
Dedicated to an Eternal Spiritual Master
who can save the entire universe
Contents
1. Islam is also Vaishnavism
2. Islam means Submission
3. God sends His messengers
4. Parampara — Disciplic succession
5. The Qur’an
6. The Qur’an is also shastra
7. The knowledge must be scientific
8. The Muslim religion is based on a conception of God
9. The Muslim religion is also bhakti-yoga
10. Guru — Spiritual master
11. Hazrat Muhammad is shaktyavesha-avatara
12. Hazrat Muhammad is an acharya
13. Hazrat Muhammad is an authority
14. Hazrat Muhammad is a devotee of God
15. Hazrat Muhammad is a servant of God
16. Hazrat Muhammad is the perfect holy man
17. Hazrat Muhammad preached God-consciousness
18. Hazrat Muhammad teaches according to the class of men
19. Hazrat Muhammad could hear God
20. The Muslims are also Vaishnavas
21. A planet where pious Muslims go
22. Animal slaughter
23. God is a person
24. God is not formless
25. God can be seen
26. God is not material
27. Allah is a name of God
28. The ultimate goal is to love God
Introduction
Religion is meant for peace, not war.
Again and again God has sent His messengers to this material world to re-establish religious principles. Different messengers have revealed different scriptures in different languages accord-ing to time, place, circumstances and the intellectual capacity of the people. In this way the Vedas, Avesta, Torah, Bible and Qur’an were made available for the benefit of mankind, to bring them closer to God. Despite the different languages and different ages in which these scriptures were presented, the knowl-edge and guidance is essentially the same. That is:
1. God is one
2. Everyone is a servant of God
3. Everyone has an eternal relationship with God
4. The primary duty of everyone is Service to God
5. The goal of human life is to develop love of God.
As far as the process of each scripture is concerned, some details and rituals differ, but in essence it is all the same. Every messenger of God came to this mortal world to remind us that we should always remember God, serve God and love God. Therefore, religious principles are meant for peace and prosperity, not war. Vaishnavism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Chris-tianity and Islam are all meant for uniting people, not dividing them.
“In the vase there is a variety of flowers, and that variety helps us better appreciate the idea of flowers. That is called unity in diversity,” said Srila Prabhupada. But because of misunderstanding, misinterpretation and deviation from the revealed scriptures, hundreds and hundreds of sects have already appeared, even within the same religious communities, what to speak of other communities. People quarrel, fight and kill each other under the name of reli-gion. So much degradation. There is no peace and prosperity on this earth. How can we gain the peace and prosperity that everyone is searching for? In this dark age of quarrel and hypocrisy, God has sent us His most merciful servant, A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Srila Prabhupada, to re-establish true religious principles and unite all the religions under the non-sectarian, nonmaterial, transcendental flag of love of God.
As a humble saint, A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada never criticised any religion or any bona fide representative of any religion. Some people say Srila Prabhupada was a genius, some say a great religious teacher, some say a friend like no other, but Srila Prabhupada said: “I am simply a servant of a servant of a servant of God.” By re-establishing the Absolute Truth as it was, as it is, and as it always should be without adding or subtracting anything from the way it was presented to him, he began an international movement that has already united people of all religions, nations, ages, etc.. Thanks to his compassion and struggle, souls from all walks of life: scientists, businessmen, philosophers, laborers, housewives and students are all marching under the united nations transcendental flag of love of God.
In this work we present Statements by A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada on Islam taken from his books, lectures and conversations. We sincerely hope it will help people develop a proper understanding of interreligious connections, ” unity in diversity .”
Srila Prabhupada : Islam is also Vaishnavism.
Dr. Patel : Mohammedanism is not Vaishnavism.
Srila Prabhupada : No, no. Chaitanya Mahaprabhu talked with the Pathanas (Muslims). He proved that “Your religion is Vaishnavism.” (Morning walk. Bombay, 17/02/74)
Srila Prabhupada: Then Islam is Vaishnava dharma (religion) in a crude form like Christianity.
(Room conversation. Tehran, 14/03/75)
In these two Statements, Srila Prabhupada explains that the Isamic religion is also teaching how to become a servant of only one God and surrender to Him with love and devotion. One can cultivate the same knowledge in the Vaishnava religion but with more detailed information. In Vaishnavism, one can learn how to develop his eternal loving relationships with the Supreme Lord. Although Dr. Patel could not accept that Islam is also Vaishnavism, Srila Prabhupada explained that Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, in his conversation with the Pathana Muslims, proved by quoting from the Holy Qur’an that Islam is also Vaishnavism. At the end of his conversation all the Pathana Muslims, including the great Muslim Scholar and prince Vijuli Khan, accepted the fact that Vaishavism is a true religion teaching complete surrender to the will and desire of God, which is the meaning of Islam. Later on in 197S, in Tehran, Srila Prabhupada explained that Islam is a simplified form of the Vaishnava religion. Why? Because the Holy Prophet Muhammad taught his people according to time, place, circumstances and their intellectual level. He himself clearly said, “I received two kinds of knowledge: one of these I taught — but if I had taught them the other, it would have broken their necks.” (Nadarbeg K. Mizra, Reincarnation and Islam, Madras, 1927, p. 4)
According to the Muslim tradition, a part of the “Heavenly Book” which is kept under the Throne of Allah was revealed to the Holy Prophet Muhammad in the Arabic language. More than this, the Holy Prophet Muhammad once had miraj, or the experience of “ascending” to heaven.
And after penetrating the 7th layer of heaven, he visited the Throne of Allah and received divine knowledge from Him. This divine knowledge given by Allah to the Holy Prophet Muhammad was in three parts:
1) The knowledge that Allah ordered the Holy Prophet Muhammad to conceal from others and keep for himself
2) The knowledge that Allah allowed him to choose whether or not to conceal or reveal to others
3) The knowledge that Allah ordered the Apostle to communicate to all members of his ummah (community). (Geo Widengren. Muhammad, the Apostle of
God, and His Ascension. Uppsala, 1955, p. 108)
In this way, the Holy Prophet Muhammad got part of the unlimited spiritual knowledge and at the same time was ordered by Allah to conceal some parts of this knowledge.
Thus from statements of the Holy Prophet and from his life, we can understand that he withheld some confidential knowledge about the Supreme Lord. Therefore, Srila Prabhupada said that Islam is simplified Vaishnavism. By these words Srila Prabhupada had no intention to discredit the Islamic religion. He actually had all respect for Islam as we will see later on. That is why he said that Islam is also Vaishnavism. But what Srila Prabhupada meant is that not all aspects of Vaishnava philosophy were revealed by the Holy Prophet Muhammad, as he himself states.
Yoga student : In fact Muslims object to their religion being called Mohammedanism because it implies that they worship Muhammad, whereas in fact they feel that they go straight to God, to Allah, and that Muhammad simply was a messenger.
Srila Prabhupada : That’s good.
Yoga student : And they call their religion Islam, which means submission.
Srila Prabhupada : That’s very good.
Yoga student : The Muslim is he who submits.
(Room conversation. Tehran, 14/03/75)
Srila Prabhupada : Religion means to surrender to God. It doesn’t matter what religion you profess. It doesn’t matter. But you must learn how to obey the Supreme Lord. That is religion. Religion does not mean that you stamp some stereotype religion, “I am Christian,” “I am Hindu,” “I am Muslim,” “I am Buddhist,” and then fight. That is not religion. That is fanaticism. Religion means how one has become devoted to God. That is religion.
You claim to be religious, or you claim to be Hindu or Christian or Buddhist. That’s all right But do you know what is God? Oh, everyone is silent. He does not know what is God. And what is his religion? If you do not know what is God, a vague idea, that is not religion. You must know what is God. Just like to become an American citizen, it requires you to know something of the history of America. So ask an American citizen, “What are you?”
“Now, I’m American.”
“Who is your president?’
“I do not know.”
What is this nonsense American? Would you like to hear from him, “I do not know who is my president.” Similarly, a human being professing some certain type of religion, but if you ask him, “What is God?”
Religion must be in relationship with God; any religion. But ask him, “What is God?” No answer. But religion means yato bhaktir adhoksaje — by practising it, one becomes a devotee of the Lord. That is religion, First-class religion. (Lecture on Srimad Bhagavatam. 9/01/74)
Srila Prabhupada: Religion means obedience to God. Religion does not mean anything else. You can manufacture so many formulas and theses. But the real meaning is obedience to God. That is religion. Simple definition. If a man is obedient to God, it doesn’t matter to which religion he belongs. He may be Christian, he may be Hindu, he may be Mussalman. It doesn’t matter. Religion means obedience to God.(Lecture on Srimad Bhagavatam. 12/12/73)
Here Srila Prabhupada again and again emphasised that religion means surrender to or obedience to God. Islam also means full surrender to the will of God. Many times the Holy Prophet Muhammad explained that everyone is a banda, or slave of Allah and must obey His order. We should understand our original, constitutional position as servants of God and by following His instructions we will develop our eternal loving relationship with the Supreme Lord.
People should not just put arubber stamp on themselves, “I am Christian,” “I am Hindu,” “I am Muslim” and then fight. This is not a religious activity but fanaticism born from ignorance. Another meaning of Islam is “peace.” Islam must bring peace, not war. If someone under the name of Islam advocates war, this means he has misunderstood or misinterpreted Islam. We should not be bewildered by such unscrupulous interpreters, rather we should follow true, eternal Islam, which will bring universal peace to the world. In the beginning of his preaching, the Holy Prophet Muhammad and his followers were severely persecuted by Meccan leaders. The Holy Prophet tolerated and taught his followers to be tolerant and forgiving towards their persecutors. Later on when Meccan leaders decided to kill the Holy Prophet Muhammad, he escaped to Medina. There the number of Muslims rapidly increased, and the Meccans decided to march upon Medina and kill all the Muslims. This time the Holy Prophet got a revelation from God that sanctioned fighting and killing for the purpose of protecting religious principles. Thus it is stated in the sura “Al-Baqarah” or “The Cow” of the Holy Qur’an (2.190-193):
“Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loves not transgressors. And slay them wherever you catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for persecution is worse than slaughter, but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who reject faith.
But if they cease, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. And fight them on until there is no more persecution and the religion becomes Allah’s.”
Prominent Muslim scholar Abdullah Yusuf Ali comments :
“War is permissible in self-defence, and under well-defined limits. When undertaken, it must be pushed with vigour, but not relentlessly, but only to restore peace and freedom for the worship of Allah. In any case, strict limits must not be transgressed: women, children, old and infirm men should not be molested, nor trees and crops cut down, nor peace withheld when the enemy comes to terms.” (Abdullah Yusuf Ali, The Holy Qur-an, Al-Madinah, 1411H, p. 79)
This is the actual meaning of Jihad, or Holy War. If an enemy is attacking one with deadly weapons, with the intention to destroy or impede one’s religious activities, one can fight and kill for the protection of religious principles. However, nowadays, many leaders are advocating war under the name of jihad. They are using religious terms to promote political ambitions. They dress themselves as religionists, but actually they are atheists. People should be very careful not to be victimised by such dishonest and misguided leaders.
So, in Medina, the Muslims were attacked many times by Meccans and despite having smaller numbers, they always emerged victorious. During these wars, the Holy Prophet Muhammad gave special orders that Muslims should not kill monks, children, women, old and helpless people. Once after battle, the Holy Prophet saw dead women on the battlefield. He became very upset and chastised his followers.
Finally, despite severe persecutions and wars, the Holy Prophet Muhammad conquered Mecca and entered the city with a huge army without shedding any blood or taking revenge upon his persecutors; instead he forgave them. This is how the Holy Prophet acted.
In conclusion, the Holy Prophet Muhammad said: “The most excellent Jihad is the uttering of truth in the presence of an unjust ruler.” (Mishkat, 17)
Muslims should learn from his example and follow his instructions without deviation. Thus by following the orders of God revealed in the scriptures and surrendering unto Him, everyone will become obedient servants of God and develop their loving relationship with Him.
Once the Holy Prophet Muhammad shed light on another aspect of Jihad. He said:
” The most excellent Jihad (Holy War) is that for conquest of self .”
(Abdullah Al-Mamun Al-Suhrawardy, The sayings of Muhammad, London, 1905, p. 27)
Here is a good description of Jihad. The Holy Prophet Muhammad himself explained that Jihad means fighting and conquering the impurities of consciousness. It is not that one should fight with the enemy on the outside. No. Actually, one should fight with the enemies that is inside. Who are these internal enemies? They are lust, greed and anger. These are three gates leading to hell. One should fight and conquer these enemies. Jihad may require fighting in Allah’s cause, as a form of self-sacrifice. But its essence consists in:
1) true and sincere faith, which so fixes its attention on Allah, that all selfish or worldly motives seem insignificant and fade away, and
2) enthusiastic and incessant activities, involving the sacrifice of one’s life, or wealth, in the service of Allah. Mere brutal fighting is opposed to the whole spirit of Jihad, while the sincere scholar’s pen or the preacher’s voice or the wealthy man’s contributions may be the most valuable forms of Jihad. This is the inner, esoteric meaning of the term Jihad, Holy War.
Srila Prabhupada: When our constitutional position or dharma has deteriorated due to the contaminations of matter, the Lord Himself comes as an incarnation or sends some of His confidential servitors. Lord Jesus Christ called himself the “son of God,” and so he is a representative of the Supreme. Similarly, Muhammad identified himself as a servant of the Supreme Lord.
Thus whenever there is a discrepancy in our constitutional position, the Supreme Lord either comes Himself or sends His representative to inform us of the real position of the living entity. (On the Way to Krishna, Ch. 2)
Here Srila Prabhupada explains the universal law of the Supreme Lord. Whenever religious principles deteriorated to the influence of the illusory material energy, God sent some of His confidential servants like Jesus Christ or Hazrat Muhammad to inform people of their real position as eternal servitors of God. In this way, Moses and Jesus were sent to Jews and Hazrat Muhammad to Arabs to re-establish the eternal religious principles that everyone is a servant of God and should serve Him with love and devotion. Each messenger of God accepts the authority of the previous messengers and scriptures.
The Holy Qur’an (2.285) expresses this principle in the following way:
“The Messenger believes in what has been revealed to him from his Lord, as do the men of faith. Each one (of them) believes in Allah, His angels, His books and His messengers. ‘We make no distinction (they say) between any of His messengers.'”
The prominent Muslim scholar Abdullah Yusuf Ali comments :
“It is not for us to make any distinction between one and another of Allah’s Messengers: we must honour them all equally, though we know that Allah in His wisdom sent them with different kinds of missions and gave them different degrees of rank.” (Abdullah Yusuf Ali, The Holy Qur-an, Al-Madinah, 1411 H, p. 132)
Thus the Holy Qur’an accepts all previous scriptures and messengers. It is explained here that the messengers of God accept the Supreme Lord, His angels (who are administrating material affairs), scriptures (sent by God through His different representatives) and all of God’s other messengers. They never discriminate between any of His messengers, which means that they never say, ‘This messenger is better than another,” or “We accept this messenger but do not care about that one.” Thus we should understand that God sends His messengers or representatives to different nations to preach the Absolute Truth according to time, place and circumstances.
The Holy Qur’an (12.2) explains this point in the following verse of sura “Yusuf,” or “Joseph”:
“We (Allah) have revealed it, a Lecture (Qur’an) in Arabic, that you (Muhammad) may understand.”
Allah explained here that He revealed the Qur’an in Arabic so that the Holy Prophet Muhammad may understand it and convey it to other Arabs. Allah, time after time, reveals His eternal message to different prophets in the appropriate language. Although the linguistic expressions and terms are different, the essential knowledge is the same:
1) God is one
2) Everyone is the servant of God
3) We must serve and love God
4) And to do so, we must chant His holy name.
This is the universal message of God contained in all scriptures.
Furthermore it is stated in the sura “Al-Baqarah,” or “The Cow” of the Holy Qur’an (2.253):
“Those Messengers we endowed with gifts, some above others: to some of them Allah spoke; others He raised to degrees (of honour).”
Thus, different gifts and different modes of procedure were given to Allah’s messengers through the different ages, and perhaps their degrees are also different. According to the supreme plan of the Lord, different personalities appear in different parts of the world to deliver the eternal message of God to the nations.
In the Tafsire Kassaf(Jild 3, Chapter 60) 4th Khalifoi Islam, son-in-law of the Holy Prophet Muhammad, Hazrat Ali said:
“Allah-Taala sent one black coloured nabi (one who delivers the message of God) whose name is not mentioned in the Qur’an.” (Tafsire Madarek, Juj 2, Egypt, p. 65)
In the sura “Al-Baqarah,” or ‘The Cow” of the Holy Qur’an (2.136), we find the following verse:
“Say you: ‘We believe in Allah, and the revelation given to us, to Abraham, Ismail, Isaac, Jacob, to the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) the Prophets from their Lord: we make no difference between one and another of them: and we submit to Allah.'”
Here we have the creed of Islam — to believe in:
1) the one universal God
2) the message that has come to us through the Holy Prophet Muhammad and the signs (ayats) interpreted by him
3) the messages delivered by other prophets in the past. These are mentioned in three groups:
(1) Abraham, Ismail, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes; of these Abraham apparently had a scripture
(2) Moses and Jesus, who each left a scripture
(3) other scriptures, prophets, or messengers of God, not specifically mentioned in the Holy Qur’an. Their message in essence was one, and that is the basis of Islam.
In the Tarikhe Hatndan, Chapter Babul Kaf, the Holy Prophet Muhammad mentioned one divine personality who descended in India. He described his colour and gave his name. These are the words of the Holy Prophet Muhammad:
“In India one black coloured nabi advented and his name was Kahan.”
In the opinion of the prominent Muslim scholar Alhaz Ahmad Tofic, the person mentioned by the Holy Prophet Muhammad in the Tarikhe Hatndan is Krishna, who appeared in India 5,000 years ago, whose colour was blackish and who delivered to mankind the message of God, famously known as the Bhagavad-gita.
Another interesting piece of evidence was given by one of the close associates of the Holy Prophet Muhammad, namely Ab’uhurairah. According to Ab’uhurairah, the Holy Prophet of Islam said:
“Certainly God will send to my sect at the end of every hundred years, a person who will renew my religion.” (Mishcat-ul-Masabih, Calcutta, 1809, p. 62)
One example of such renewal is recorded in a very exciting conversation about the Holy Qur’an between Chaitanya Mahaprabhu and Abdullah Pathana about 500 years ago. In this conversation the Hidden Treasure of Al-Qur’an was again revealed to mankind. (Anyone interested can read The Hidden Treasure of Al-Qur’an by Dr. Ravanari Das)
Another incident involving Chaitanya Mahaprabhu took place when the Muslim King of Bengal, Ala’ uddin Saiyad Hussain Shah (1498-1511), heard of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu’s influence in attracting innumerable people. He said: “Such a person, who is followed by so many people without giving them charity, must be a prophet. I can surely understand this fact.”
Then Hussain Shah ordered the magistrate: “Do not disturb this prophet out of jealousy. Let him do as he wills wherever he likes.”
Later, in private, the King inquired from his minister, Dabir Khas, about this personality, Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. Dabir Khas replied: “This prophet always desires your good fortune. By his grace, all your business is successful. By his blessings, you will attain victory everywhere. Why are you questioning me? Better that you question your own mind. Because you are the King of the people, you are the representative of the Supreme. Therefore you can understand this better than me.”
The King said: “I consider Chaitanya Mahaprabhu to be a divine personality. There is no doubt about it.” (Chaitanya-charitamrita, Madhya-Lila, Chapter 1, Texts 168-180)
4. Parampara — Disciplic succession
Srila Prabhupada: If Muhammad is the servant of God and Jesus Christ is the son of God, then where is the break of the disciplic succession. After all the disciplic succession is beginning from God, so how do you find that there is no disciplic succession? If the original tree has branches, twigs and leaves and they are in touch with the original tree, it is all right. The test is whether the line is in touch with the Supreme — that is all.
Although Muhammad and Jesus Christ appeared in the Kali Yuga (the present age of quarrel and hypocrisy) their instruction is as it is because the persons to whom they had to speak could not understand any more and they find it difficult to understand even that much. (Letter 19/07/70)
Here Srila Prabhupada explains the very important con-ception of parampara from the Vedic literatures. Parampara means disciplic succession, or chain of self-realised souls who convey spiritual knowledge without adulteration. The absolute knowledge descends through generations of spiritual masters and disciples. The topmost disciples become preceptors and pass on the teachings to their disciples. Parampara, or disciplic succession begins from God. The Holy Prophet Muhammad received knowledge of God through the archangel Gabriel; therefore he is in the line of disciplic succession.
According to tradition, it was the practice of the Holy Prophet Muhammad to retire from his family to a desert cave for meditation for one month every year. His place of retreat was Hira, a desert hill not far from Mecca, and his chosen month was Ramazan (December), the month of heat. It was there, one night towards the end of his stay, that the first revelation came to him when he was forty years old. This happened on the seventeenth day of Ramazan month (22nd of December, 610). That date is since named Al-Gadir, “Night of Power”.
Hazrat Muhammad was asleep when he heard a voice calling him. When he opened his eyes, he saw a bright dazzling light and fell unconscious. When he regained consciousness, he saw an angel in the likeness of a man, carrying a written document enveloped in precious silk. The angel said, “Read!” He replied, “I cannot read.” Indeed he was illiterate.
The angel placed the document on his chest. Hazrat Muhammad felt as if a mountain had fallen upon him and thought that he would die of suffocation. Then the angel lifted the document and repeated, “Read!” He replied, “I cannot read” but again the angel pressed him even stronger than before. A third time the angel commanded in a more terrible voice, “Read!”
“What have I to read?’
The angel said:
“Read: In the name of your Lord Who created,
Created man from a clot.
Read: Your Lord is Most Bountiful,
Who taught by the pen,
Taught man that which he knew not.”
( The Qur’an 96.1-5 )
Hazrat Muhammad submissively repeated the words, and they remained “as if inscribed in his heart.” He went out of the cave, onto the hillside, and heard the same awe-inspiring voice say, “O Muhammad! You are Allah’s messenger, and I am Gabriel.” Then he raised his eyes and saw the angel standing in the sky above the horizon and again the dreadful voice said, “O Muhammad! You are Allah’s messenger, and I am Gabriel.” Hazrat Muhammad stood still. Due to the brightness of the light, he turned his face away, but in whichever direction he would turn his face, the angel always stood there confronting him. He remained standing there for a long time until the angel vanished. Thus the Holy Prophet Muhammad received the first revelation of the Holy Qur’an and was appointed as a messenger of God. (Marmaduke Pickthall. The Holy Qur’an. New Delhi, 1990, p. 5)
Srila Prabhupada gave the example of the tree: is given that if the branches, twigs and leaves are in touch with the original tree, then nourishment is there. The test is whether the line is in touch with the Supreme Lord. That is all. In this way, because the Holy Prophet Muhammad is in touch with God through the archangel Gabriel, he is a bona fide spiritual master.
The next point Srila Prabhupada made is that although Hazrat Muhammad appeared in the modem age called Kali Yuga (Iron Age), or age of quarrel and hypocrisy, his instruction is as it is. Because the persons to whom he had to speak could not understand the whole truth and they even found it difficult to understand parts of that truth, he had to speak according to the level of their intellectual capacities.
Therefore once, the Holy Prophet Muhammad said, “Speak to people according to the level of their intellectual capacities. For if you speak all things to all men, some cannot understand you, and so fall into errors.” (Abdullah al-Mamun al-Suhrawardy. The Sayings of Muhammad, London, 1905, p. 31)
In this connection, the prominent Muslim scholar Abdullah Yusuf Ali writes :
“While the basic principles of Allah’s Law remain the same; its form, expression and application have varied from time to time, e. g., from Moses to Jesus, and from Jesus to Muhammad.” (The Holy Qur-an. The Presidency of Islamic Researchers, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah, 1410 H., p. 1939)
Nava-yauvana : In Islam they say that God cannot come to this earth.
Atreya Rishi : God would not come to this earth.
Srila Prabhupada : God cannot speak? God cannot come. A very big man, he can come, but He (God) cannot speak?
Atreya Rishi : They agree. He can speak and He can send representatives.
Srila Prabhupada : Because He has spoken to Muhammad, and Muhammad has come, he is speaking the same thing. There is no need of God’s coming. If
Muhammad is speaking on behalf of God, then that is all right. There is no need of God’s coming. This is parampara.
(Morning walk. Tehran, 12/08/76)
Again Srila Prabhupada mentions in his morning walk in Tehran that because God has spoken to Hazrat Muhammad, and the Holy Prophet Muhammad is simply repeating the same message on behalf of God, this is parampara, disciplic succession, or chain of teachers.
Srila Prabhupada : The revealed scripture of the Muslims is the Qur’an. (Chaitanya-charitamrita. Madhya-lila, 18.190)
Srila Prabhupada : Just like in your country there is the Bible or any other scripture. We have got the Vedas. The Muslims, they have got the Qur’an. These scriptures can help also because they are also authority. But you will find that one scripture is differing from other scriptures in some details. Of course, on average there is no difference. (Lecture, 25/04/69)
Srila Prabhupada : The Muslims accept the Qur’an. What is the purpose for all these books of knowledge? They are to train us to understand our position as pure soul. Their purpose is to restrict bodily activities by certain rules and regulations, and these rules and regulations are known as codes of morality. (Beyond Birth and Death. Ch. 1)
Srila Prabhupada : According to the climate, according to the population, according to the country, there are different books of knowledge. Just like in India the books of knowledge are accepted as the Vedas, Vedic knowledge. In your European, American countries the accepted books of knowledge are the Old Testament and the New Testament. Similarly, the book of knowledge amongst the Muslims, (which) they have accepted is the Qur’an. Actually, they are all books of knowledge; undoubtedly. There is no doubt about it. But what are these books of knowledge? Religious scriptures! Religious scriptures are meant for training you to (understand) the conception of life that you are a pure soul, nothing more. They restrict your bodily activities under certain conditions. That is called morality. (Lecture on Bhagavad-gita, 25/03/66)
Srila Prabhupada : This message (of God) may also be found in the Bhagavad-gita and other Vedic literatures, in the Bible and the Qur’an — in any bona fide scripture — or it may be heard from a realised soul. (On the Way to Krishna, Ch. 3)
Srila Prabhupada : According to the Vedic scriptures, if one can support his stand by quoting from the Vedas, his argument is perfect. Similarly, when the Muslims support their stand with quotations from the Qur’an, their arguments are also authorised. (Chaitanya-charitamrita. Adi-lila, 7.155p)
Srila Prabhupada : If you purchase the Bhagavad-gita, if you purchase the Bible, if you purchase the Qur’an, or… There are so many literatures. They are also authorised. (Lecture on Bhagavad-gita, 16/12/66)
Srila Prabhupada : So in the Qur’an there is God-consciousness, in the Bible there is God-consciousness, in the Vedas there is God-consciousness. (Lecture on Chaitanya-charitamrita, 24/02/71)
Srila Prabhupada : Vedas means the books of transcendental knowledge. Not only the Bhagavad-gita, even the Bible or the Qur’an, they are also (books of transcendental knowledge). (Lecture, 29/07/68)
Srila Prabhupada : If you find that by following some religious principles you are developing your love of God, then it is perfect. It doesn’t matter whether it is the Bible or the Qur’an or the Bhagavad-gita; it doesn’t matter. (Lecture, 18/10/68)
In the above statements, Srila Prabhupada, first of all, stresses that the holy Qur’an is a revealed scripture or a book of transcendental knowledge. Then Srila Prabhupada explains that according to the climate, population, and country there are different books of knowledge, like the Vedas, the Torah, the Bible, and the Qur’an. Although one scripture is differing from other scriptures in some details, on the whole the essence is the same. Throughout the world all the bona fide scriptures explain the same Absolute Truth in different languages and from different angles of view. The purpose of all these scriptures or books of knowledge is to give us understanding about our position as a pure soul. Their purpose is to restrict the bodily activities by certain rules and regulations, and these rules and regulations are known as codes of morality. In all these books, the message of God may be found. All of them are teaching God-consciousness, awareness of God.
Finally, Srila Prabhupada said that if one finds that by following that particular religious process he is developing love of God, then it is perfect. It doesn’t matter where this religious process is described, whether in the Bible or in the Qur’an or in the Bhagavad-gita. This means that the main goal of human life is to develop love of God, not just blindly following some religious principles or scripture and fanatically advertising them without being conscious (aware) of the goal. The goal is love of God, not just following religious principles or scriptures and forgetting the goal. Everyone must understand this essential knowledge.
The Hidden Treasure of Al-Qur’an
The Most Beautiful (99) Names of Allah
With obeisances to the readers; A pure Muslim and a pure Vaishnava are certainly not the same. Only the devotee of Radha Krishna goes to Goloka Vrndavana. So far as the practical application of what passes for Islam in our world, the sentence for converting a Muslim to a devotee of Mahaprabhu is still death in Islamic countries, also for witches, magicians, etc. Neither is it allowed to practice any other faith than Islam in the more conservative regimes, so harinam sankirtana will still get you whipped or killed. That is what happened to Srila Haridasa Thakura. If one reads the history, in his time Prophet Muhammad engaged in wholesale slaughter of innocents. Considering these things, was Srila Prabhupada not merely preaching nicely to the Muslim fanatics and the rest of the world, and thus as a technique to make them swallow the medecine, sugar-coating the truth for their consumption? Was he not speaking of ideals and not actual realities?
pamho agtacbsp may be it were vaisnavism the muslim religion but now got very degraded i’m living in a area mix with hindu and muslim in east london so i know them very well of course not all of them are corrupt but most of them are really nasty people i heard that muhammad got really mad at the end of his life i don’t know if is a speculation or reality that he die with lust desire anyway doesn’t matter what they said the point is that they are becoming a serious problem to the society and hg madhusevita prabhu told me when i were devotee full time in italy that there is a prophecy on the muslim religion that when a drop of water of the ganges fell on the black stone that they worship in la mecca all the muslim religion with all his followers will be destroy will disappear from the surface of the planet they know that that’s why is not allowed to go in the place of their worship with dress few years ago the police closed a mosque in north london and arrested the so called muslim guru for spreading terrorist philosophy through out the country they got more degraded of the christian religion that’s why they will be punish because they think they got the monopoly of the real religion without knowing that is still material for uncivilized people as they are anyway is not a question of criticze that’s the truth unfortunately ys seva das
It makes sense what Tamohara das said : ”Was he not speaking of ideals and not actual realities? ”
Indeed, what more proof do we need about the Islam and the Muslin, they are evil. Hope the profecy is real and will happen soon. The Christian are also degraded, but they give freedoom for someone to choose what to believe or beleve in nothing and many Christians are Vegan.
The Muslin attacked even Lord Gouranga and His associeates e followers. He destroy Indian by war, bombing, rape, by reproducing like rats and thus created Pakistan – what more patethic is for a Vaishnava, for a devote or for a Hindu and actually, for any inteligent person be friend with these people?
It seems odd to me that Mataji criticizes me for speaking my honest understanding of what Srila Prabhupada taught us, saying my understanding is mere speculation and interpretation and therefore offensive, but her limited or slanted or speculative opinion is the pure absolute truth?
Anyway, I am not interested in opinions so much.
However, here is a quote for you to ponder; ” Our Movement is a declaration of war against MAYA. that you can understand very well, so we have to recruit many fighting soldiers-so do it vigorously! ” Srila Prabhupada
Srila Prabhupada; There is two mission: not only to give protection to the devotees, but also to kill the demons. To kill the demons, that is one side. So the devotees of Krishna should be trained up both ways: not only to give protection to the devotees, to give them encouragement, but if need be, they should be prepared to kill the demons. That is Vaisnavism. It is not cowardism. It is not cowardism. When need be. [Bhagavad-Gita Lecture 1.7 July 11 1973]
” Abandon all varieties of religion and dharma and simply surrender unto Me. I shall protect you, do not fear !” Lord Sri Krsna.
How will Srila Prabhupada accept those who do not take Krsna’s direct instructions and surrender to Him ? Did not Mahaprabhu specify Krsna? So, simply, anything less is a degree of deviation for us, we are not relativistic moralizers, but adherents of the Absolute truth, and that is Radha Krsna, of course. If we follow the new-age course incorrectly, in the name of secularism, we will lose our identity.
My obeisances. HK
Note: this is an interesting conversation:
740609RC.PAR conversations
Prabhupada: That’s all right. So if you have no name, then why don’t you take this name, “Krsna”?
Jyotirmayi: (French)
Prabhupada: What is the objection?
Man: (French)
Prabhupada: Caitanya Mahaprabhu says…Caitanya Mahaprabhu says, namnam akari bahudha nija-sarva-saktis.
namnam akari bahudha nija-sarva-saktis
tatrarpita niyamitah smarane na kalah
etadrsi tava krpa bhagavan mamapi
durdaivam idrsam ihajani nanuragah
Bahudha: God has many names. If you are missing, so you can take one of the name. Krsna is one of the names, so what is the objection? And Caitanya Mahaprabhu said, “In this name, all the potencies of God is there.” Namnam akari bahudha nija-sarva-sakti tatrarpita. That name is as powerful as God Himself. There is no difference between the name and God, because He is absolute. Here in the material world there is the difference between name and the person or the thing. If I am thirsty, if I simply chant “water, water, water,” that will not appease my thirstiness. But the spiritual world, absolute, the name and the person is the same. Abhinnatvan nama-naminoh. Under the circumstances, if you are missing some name, so take this name. Why it should not be taken?
Jyotirmayi: (French)
Priest: Yeah, but you can take “Rama,” you can take “Parasurama,” you can take (indistinct).
Prabhupada: Yes, yes, any name, any name.
Priest: Krsna has no special…
Prabhupada: No. Special there is. In this way, it is recommended in the sastra, recommended in the sastra: harer nama. Harer means of God. Harer nama harer nama harer namaiva kevalam [Adi 17.21]. So this is the…We have to chant the name of God. This is the prescription. This is Vaisnava.
Priest: Does it matter…
Prabhupada: Now, there are thousands and thousands of names, that we also admitted. At least we have got sahasra-nama, visnu sahasra. But in another place it is said, other Upanisad, Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare Hare/ Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama…This name is recommended. Just like Agni Purana and Kalisantarana Upanisad, in this Vedic literature, this…
Priest: Yeah, but each Upanisad will recommend its own specific Deity, you know. Rama, as you say, Hare Rama. Or Siva.
Prabhupada: Yes, Rama is all right. Rama we chant. Hare Rama we chant. Hare Krsna and Hare Rama. Rama also we chant.
Priest: Or Siva. I mean, you see, in the Svetasvatara Upanisad.
Devotee: (Sanskrit)
Priest: I mean, what devotees? You have got bhakti also in the Saivite , all the others.
Pusta Krsna: The argument, if you say that it is not special, then you will say that you can chant any name.
Priest: Yes.
Pusta Krsna: We say that God’s name is special, whatever name it is. Not that we eliminate God, saying He’s not special. He is special. Whether you call Him by this authorized name or that authorized name, His name is special because it’s nondifferent from Him. So not that we should just overlook the name of God because we’re overlooking God. We do that, so we have to…
Prabhupada: Harer nama [Adi 17.21]. Harer nama means God’s name.
Priest: You see, for instance, in Christianity for a long time there was a bhakti, and this bhakti was devoted to the name of Jesus. So for a very long time you had that Jesus bhakti. And in your country, in America today, like you have got the Hare Krsna, you have got also the Jesus devotees. Now, this is also present in many places. And the name does not matter. There is no name who has got the…Because then you find again what…
Prabhupada: No. If Jesus is the name of God, then you can chant. If Jesus is the name of God. But Jesus, Lord Jesus Christ, says that he is son of God. Of course, there is no difference between son and the father. That is another thing. But still, if I want the father, how by calling the name of son I can get the father? That is also another thing.
Priest: Yeah, but I mean, this is another point.
Prabhupada: But if you have got the father’s name, why should you call Him by the son’s name?
Priest: Yeah, but this is another discussion (indistinct). What we mean by father and son, you know, we don’t mean it…
Prabhupada: That everyone’s father and son is the same. If father says something and the son says…Just like in a big family, if the son orders something, it is as good as the father’s order. That is our experience. But still, if you want to call the father, you will not get the father’s response by calling the name of the son.
Priest: Jesus told us, “If you see me, you see the Father, because the Father cannot be seen.” It was a common name. Yoshua was a common Jewish name.
Prabhupada: Yes. Hare Krsna. Now, one thing is that if we are interested in chanting the name of God, if it is available, then why should I chant the name of the son?
Priest: No, it is not that question. The question is…
Devotee: Excuse me for interrupting, but one thing was that you suggested that the name of Krsna is a very common name…
Priest: Yeah.
Devotee: …in the sense that many people may be called Krsna. But the Supreme God is also called Krsna. So if you chant His name, you derive the benefit even if you’re not thinking of Him as the Supreme.
Priest: Yeah, but for the Christian the same. Jesus is a very common name.
Devotee: That’s all right. We’re saying chant. Our spiritual master is teaching “You chant the name of God.” That’s the important thing.
Prabhupada: If you think that Jesus Christ’s name is also, you can chant, we have no objection. We say that you chant the holy name of God, whatever you have got. That’s all right.
Priest: And for a Muslim you mean to chant Allah.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Priest: Name Krsna, Allah, Jesus, (indistinct), what is the…
Prabhupada: ALLAH IS NOT NAME. THAT IS…IT IS NOT THE NAME. IT IS JUST LIKE THE IDEA OF GOD.
Priest: Yeah.
Prabhupada: ALLAH MEANS GOD, ISVARA.
Priest: Allah means also (indistinct).
Prabhupada: BUT THAT IS NOT THE NAME. THAT IS…JUST LIKE THE PRESIDENT AND MR. NIXON. THE PRESIDENT MAY BE ANOTHER PERSON. NOT ONLY NIXON, BUT ANOTHER PERSON ALSO MAY BE. SO PRESIDENT IS THE GENERAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE POST. BUT STILL, ONE WHO OCCUPIES THE POST, HE HAS GOT A NAME.
Priest: Do you know the Sufi?
Prabhupada: Huh?
Priest: Do you know the Sufis are Muslims (indistinct).
Prabhupada: No.
Priest: They are the great mystics of Islam, and they always address God as Allah. As we say…
Prabhupada: Allah means God.
Priest: Yes. It is the name of God for them. “Allah the all-knowing is great.” Anybody who knows Islam knows that.
Prabhupada: ANYWAY, IF ONE CHANTS ALLAH OR JESUS CHRIST, WE HAVE NO OBJECTION. WE DON’T SAY THAT YOU STOP IT. WE SAY THAT YOU CHANT THE HOLY NAME OF GOD. IF THAT NAME IS OF GOD, YOU CHANT.
Yogesvara: Yesterday, Srila Prabhupada, you gave the story, I think you said it was from the Padma Purana, about a Muslim who was attacked by a wild boar.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Yogesvara: He was attacked by a wild boar, and the boars for the Muslims are untouchable. So he was saying haram, haram, which means untouchable. And he was killed by that boar, but it was taken by higher authority that he was chanting “ha rama,” which means “where is Lord Rama,” so he derived liberation. Even unconsciously he was chanting and derived liberation.
Prabhupada: Although he did not mean Rama, he condemned the boar as haram, condemned. But the…
Priest: Same story is said in the bhakti tradition of Maharastra of the hunter.
Prabhupada: Yes, may be the same story.
Priest: Untouchable hunter who was chased by a boar and went to a tree, and then…It is a common story.
Prabhupada: Anyway, we are recommending “Chant the holy name of God.” (end)
Under the spell of the Quality of the THREE Gunas, the Living entities particularly in the Human form of life develops LOVE OF GOD proportionately to the believe and understanding under the control of the Quality level of ones’ own GOD consciousness according to the time, place and circumstances as we can read and understand from the 740609RC.PAR conversations quoted by Mahesh Raja’s comments.
OM TAT SAT.
Hare Krishna. All Glories to Srila Prabhupada.
Adi 17.169 The Pastimes of Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu in His Youth
THE SASTRAS OF THE YAVANAS, OR MEAT-EATERS, ARE NOT ETERNAL SCRIPTURES. THEY HAVE BEEN FASHIONED RECENTLY, AND SOMETIMES THEY CONTRADICT ONE ANOTHER. THE SCRIPTURES OF THE YAVANAS ARE THREE: THE OLD TESTAMENT, THE NEW TESTAMENT AND THE KORAN. THEIR COMPILATION HAS A HISTORY; THEY ARE NOT ETERNAL LIKE THE VEDIC KNOWLEDGE. THEREFORE ALTHOUGH THEY HAVE THEIR ARGUMENTS AND REASONINGS, THEY ARE NOT VERY SOUND AND TRANSCENDENTAL. As such, modern people advanced in science and philosophy deem these scriptures unacceptable.
Sometimes Christian priests come to us inquiring, “Why are our followers neglecting our scriptures and accepting yours?” But when we ask them, “Your Bible says, ‘Do not kill.’ Why then are you killing so many animals daily?” they cannot answer. Some of them imperfectly answer that the animals have no souls. But then we ask them, “How do you know that animals have no souls? Animals and children are of the same nature. Does this mean that the children of human society also have no souls?” According to the Vedic scriptures, within the body is the owner of the body, the soul. In the Bhagavad-gita (2.13) it is said:
dehino ‘smin yatha dehe
kaumaram yauvanam jara
tatha dehantara-praptir
dhiras tatra na muhyati
“As the embodied soul continuously passes, in this body, from boyhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly passes into another body at death. The self-realized soul is not bewildered by such a change.”
Because the soul is within the body, the body changes through so many forms. There is a soul within the body of every living entity, whether animal, tree, bird or human being, and the soul is transmigrating from one type of body to another. WHEN THE SCRIPTURES OF THE YAVANAS–NAMELY, THE OLD TESTAMENT, NEW TESTAMENT AND KORAN–CANNOT PROPERLY ANSWER INQUISITIVE FOLLOWERS, NATURALLY THOSE ADVANCED IN SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND PHILOSOPHY LOSE FAITH IN SUCH SCRIPTURES. The Kazi admitted this while talking with Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu. The Kazi was a very intelligent person. He had full knowledge of his position, as stated in the following verse.
Excellent analysis Mahesh Raja Prabhu.
There is no doubt that the worship of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu is the most transcendental process and also the most intense. Generally those who are attracted to The Brahma Madhva Gaudiya sampradaya do so because their natural predisposition (swarup) to the most intense rasa of conjugal love of Sri Radha and Sri Krishna. Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu is the transcendental embodiment of both of which such great intensity is manifested in His wonderful pastimes. Murari Gupta however, who was an associate of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu was a Rama Bhakta, and there are some very interesting pastimes concerning both his devotion to Rama and Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu (as to their ‘different’ rasa’s) so this is a generalization only. Similarly those Tattva Vadis in South India have a greater natural disposition to the ‘less intense’ rasa of Sakya or Dasya (servitorship, awe and reverence) as they worship The Lord in the form of Laxmi Narayana which is not as intense. (These things of course are beyond our ability to quantify and are practically inconceivable).
Whatever the ‘intensity’ (or Rasa) however, this process is completely transcendental and perfectly complete, and frees the devotee of The Lord from the material energy, whereas the Sastras of the Yavanas may only promote one to the heavenly realm, which means that you have to return to the process of birth and death.
Yhs
Sudarsana