Vivekananda was also not even intelligent man …

VIVEKANANDA WAS ALSO NOT EVEN INTELLIGENT MAN BECAUSE HE ACCEPTED RAMAKRSNA AS INCARNATION OF GOD.

Note: There are many Hindus even among educated circles who tend to glorify Vivekananda and Ramakrishna but Srila Prabhupada exposes their bogus philosophy.

68-02-25. Letter: Satsvarupa
Please accept my blessings. I am in receipt of a copy of your last Istagosthi dated Jan. 27, and I am very much satisfied with your replies on the questions made in the Istagosthi. The meeting is called “Istagosthi” and not “Istagosthi”. YOU MAY KNOW ALSO THAT RAMAKRISHNA’S WORSHIP OF KALI MAKES HIM A THIRD CLASS MAN. In the Bhagavad-gita it is stated that one who worships the demigods just like Brahma, Siva, Indra, Candra or demigoddesses like Kali, Durga, Sarasvati, etc., are described as persons who have lost their intelligence. One person who has lost his intelligence, how he can become an incarnation of God? A person who has lost his intelligence, is not even counted amongst the higher section of society. So, the Ramakrishna is a bogus man according to the statement of Bhagavad-gita. VIVEKANANDA WAS ALSO NOT EVEN INTELLIGENT MAN BECAUSE HE ACCEPTED RAMAKRSNA AS INCARNATION OF GOD. THIS RAMAKRSNA, WHO IS ACTUALLY GADADHARA CHATTERJEE, DECLARED HIMSELF AS THE SAME RAMA AND KRSNA. IF HE IS ACCEPTED AS SUCH BY SOME PERSON, IS HE VERY INTELLIGENT MAN? Suppose a man comes before somebody and says he is Pres. Johnson. and the foolish man accepts the pretender as Pres. Johnson, is that man to be accepted as very intelligent man? VIVEKANANDA WAS NOT EVEN AN INTELLIGENT MAN BECAUSE HE ACCEPTED GADHADHARA CHATTERJEE AS INCARNATION OF GOD WITHOUT ANY CREDENTIALS. We accept Krsna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead on the evidence of Vedic literature. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE IN THE VEDIC LITERATURES THAT A COMMON UNINTELLIGENT PERSON BY WORSHIPPING A DEMIGODDESS KALI CAN BECOME AN INCARNATION OF GODHEAD. THE GODDESS KALI IS DIVINE MOTHER FOR THE CONDITIONED SOULS, NOT FOR THE LIBERATED SOULS. THERE IS NO DIRECTION IN THE VEDIC LITERATURES THAT ONE CAN BECOME LIBERATED EVEN BY WORSHIPPING THE GODDESS KALI. SHE IS SUPERINTENDENT OF THE PRISON HOUSE KNOWN AS MATERIAL WORLD. ONE CAN DERIVE SOME MATERIAL FACILITIES BY WORSHIPPING KALI OR DURGA, BUT NOBODY CAN BECOME LIBERATED BY WORSHIPPING SUCH DEMIGODDESSES, SO WHAT TO SPEAK OF BECOMING INCARNATION OF GODHEAD. SO THE PROPAGANDA THAT RAMAKRSNA BECAME INCARNATION OF GOD BY WORSHIPPING KALI IS NOT ACCEPTED BY ANY AUTHORIZED ACHARYA AND THEREFORE IT IS A BOGUS PROPAGANDA. ONE WHO FOLLOWS THEREFORE, SUCH BOGUS PROPAGANDA IS ALSO MISLED AS FAR AS HIS SPIRITUAL ADVANCEMENT IS CONCERNED.
You have to meet many opposing elements in the matter of preaching work therefore you should always be careful to follow the principles of Bhagavad-gita as it is. You will be glad to know that our arrangements with MacMillan for publishing Bhagavad-gita As It Is is already completed, and the manuscript is handed over to them. We should preach clearly that our Krsna Consciousness movement is surely on the basis of Bhagavad-gita as it is. Any other movement which does not tally with the principles of Bhagavad-gita as it is, is considered by us as unauthorized. All these so-called yogic or other spiritualist movements in this country imported from India are all against the principles of Bhagavad-gita. It is our movement only which strictly follows the principles of the Bhagavad-gita, under the guidance of the authorities or acaryas in disciplic succession from Lord Caitanya who practically demonstrated in life and practice the principles of Bhagavad-gita. The last word in the Bhagavad-gita is to surrender unto Krsna and Lord Caitanya taught us to surrender unto Krsna. His transcendental movement of chanting the Holy name of Krsna and Rama is the sublime movement, not only at the present age, but for all the time past, present and future.

Hegel.SYA conversations
Prabhupada: Anything nonsense idea, that is not God. God has created you. You cannot create God. AND THEY ARE CREATING GOD. JUST LIKE VIVEKANANDA MISSION, YATA MATA TATA PATHA. AS MANY OPINION YOU HAVE GOT, YOU CAN HAVE YOUR RELIGIOUS WAY. YATA MATA, THIS IS THEIR MISSION, YATA MATA TATA PATHA, “WHATEVER YOU ARE THINKING, ALL RIGHT.” RAMAKRISHNA, HE WANTED TO REALIZE GOD FROM ANY WAY. AND LATER ON HE WANTED TO REALIZE GOD BY THE MOHAMMEDANS’ WAY AND HE ASKED THE PROPRIETOR OF THE TEMPLE TO ALLOW HIM TO TAKE MEAT, COW’S FLESH. SO WHEN HE ASKED, THE PROPRIETOR SAID, “PLEASE GO OUT. GET OUT.” Now don’t real…, I don’t want the (indistinct). This philosophy also you can realize God in any way, yata mata. Now he wanted to realize in the Mohammedan’s way, therefore he thought it wise that he must eat cow’s flesh. These things are there.

730813rc.par Conversations
Prabhupada: Yes. Yes. BECAUSE VIVEKANANDA SAID, “OH, WHAT IS THE HARM THERE, IN EATING? YOU CAN EAT WHATEVER YOU LIKE. IT DOESN’T MATTER IN RELIGION.” IT WAS THE FIRST. AND HE HIMSELF WAS EATING ANYTHING. SO ALL THE RAMAKRISHNA MISSION SANNYASIS STILL, THEY ARE EATING MEAT, EGG AND EVERYTHING, ESPECIALLY IN AMERICA. YES. FISH IS NO CONSIDERATION. THAT IS DAILY AFFAIR. And the turkey,… Yes. Instead of preaching here, they have taken the Western method. And Vivekananda’s preaching is like Western missionaries–open hospitals, school…
670224CC.SF Lectures
Oh, Caitanya Mahaprabhu regrets that such a great difference between God and the living entity, and Sankaracarya has described that we are God? That means he has diminished the opulence and value of God. Suppose if I call a third-class man “His Majesty,” then what is that? This word, “His Majesty,” is misused. JUST LIKE THEY ARE SAYING, DARIDRA-NARAYANA. THE FOOLISH RAMAKRISHNA MISSION HAS, I MEAN TO SAY, DISCOVERED A WORD, DARIDRA-NARAYANA, “POOR NARAYANA.” NARAYANA, WHO IS THE HUSBAND OF MANY THOUSANDS OF GODDESS OF FORTUNE, HE HAS BECOME POOR. JUST SEE THE THEORY. You can ask Nikhilananda what is the meaning of daridra-narayana. THEY HAVE DISCOVERED. VIVEKANANDA HAS DISCOVERED. NARAYANA HAS BECOME POOR. WHEN YOU ASK HIM, “WHY DO YOU CALL DARIDRA-NARAYANA?” THEY WILL EXPLAIN LIKE THAT, “BECAUSE NARAYANA IS THERE, THEREFORE NARAYANA HAS BECOME DARIDRA.” JUST SEE. SUPPOSE A RICH MAN COMES INTO THIS STORE, SO HE BECOMES POOR JUST LIKE US. BECAUSE HE HAS KINDLY COME HERE IN THIS STORE, SO BECAUSE WE ARE ALL POOR MEN, HE’LL ALSO BECOMES POOR MAN? THIS IS THE REASON. BUT THESE ARE ALL NONSENSE. NARAYANA NEVER BECOMES POOR. THE POOR, POVERTY-STRICKEN MAN, ALL THESE THINGS ARE FOR THE JIVAS, THE LIVING ENTITIES. NARAYANA IS NEVER POOR. NARAYANA IS NEVER UNDER IGNORANCE. NARAYANA NEVER BECOMES DOG. We become dog. We become cat. You should always… Caitanya Mahaprabhu therefore rejects, that “This sort of philosophy propounded by Sankara is a great mistake because he has minimized the value of the Supreme Lord. By making a dog a god, he has insulted God. Therefore this Mayavada philosophy is the most offensive activities of the living being.” So you should be very, very careful, very careful.
701219SB.SUR Lectures
There are two classes of men in this world. One is called daiva, and the other is called asura. Asura means rebelled against God: “Don’t care for God. I am God. You are God. Everyone is God. Why you are searching after God? There are so many Gods in the streets, lying on the footpath, daridra-narayana. You serve these Gods.” You see? This is illusion. Daridra-narayana, starving God. So many subscription are raised in America in the name of serving these daridra-narayanas in India. Now these Americans are questioning that “You take money for serving the daridra-narayana. Why we see…? When we go to India, why we see so many daridra-narayanas are lying on the footpath?” These questions are being made. One of the big Ramakrishna Mission swamis, Swami Nikhilananda, he told me. It is not my manufactured story. Actually, people are claiming welfare society, welfare activities. But what welfare they are doing actually? The welfare activities are increasing, and the candidates for receiving the welfare, they are increasing. You are trying to serve the daridra-narayana, but actually the number of daridra-narayanas are increasing daily. So that is the position. Here, practically, NARAYANA CANNOT BE DARIDRA. THAT IS ANOTHER ILLUSION. NARAYANA IS THE HUSBAND OF THE GODDESS OF FORTUNE, LAKSMI. HOW HE CAN BE DARIDRA? It is also manufactured word. Laksmi-sahasra-sata-sambhrama-sevyamanam govindam adi-purusam tam aham bhajami. Here we keep one Laksmi, but as soon as there is any little discrepancy, the Laksmi immediately becomes angry and there is divorce. Practically there is no respect from the side of Laksmi to the so-called daridra-narayana. But there, thousands and thousands of Laksmis are very respectfully serving the Lord. You’ll read in the story of Rukmini, the prime Laksmi of Lord Krsna. One day Krsna was a little joking, and she took it very seriously, and she immediately fainted. So much respect. “Oh, Krsna might be thinking of leaving me.” So she fainted immediately. So much sambhrama. Laksmi-sahasra-sata-sambhrama-sevyamanam. These are the statements of scripture. And when Krsna was actually present on the planet, He showed it, how much He is respectfully served by His sixteen thousand wives, and how much comfortably He kept all of them in different palaces, and expanding Himself into sixteen thousand forms. That is God. That is God. So everyone, even the Laksmi is servant, maidservant of Krsna, what to speak of others? Dasi. So how one can claim that “I am God”? God is not so cheap. Only persons who are illusioned, they claim that “I am God.” He is servant. Instead of becoming, voluntarily rendering service to God, because they claim to be God they are more put into illusion. Maya-grasta jivera sei dasa upajaya. It is said in the Vaisnava literature, pisaci paile yena mati-cchanna haya, maya-grasta jivera sei dasa upajaya: “Just like a person, when he is haunted by ghosts, he speaks all kinds of nonsense, similarly, when a living entity is engrossed by the illusory aspect of this material nature, he also talks all foolishly.” He also talks… One of the greatest foolish things is that he claims that “I am God.

SB 3.15.25 P Description of the Kingdom of God
Brahmaji confirms herewith that only persons who have developed the desirable qualities can enter into the kingdom of God. In the Caitanya-caritamrta, the devotee’s desirable qualities are described to be twenty-six in number. They are stated as follows: He is very kind; he does not quarrel with anyone; he accepts Krsna consciousness as the highest goal of life; he is equal to everyone; no one can find fault in his character; he is magnanimous, mild and always clean, internally and externally; he does not profess to possess anything in this material world; he is a benefactor to all living entities; he is peaceful and is a soul completely surrendered to Krsna; he has no material desire to fulfill; he is meek and humble, always steady, and has conquered the sensual activities; he does not eat more than required to maintain body and soul together; he is never mad after material identity; he is respectful to all others and does not demand respect for himself; he is very grave, very compassionate and very friendly; he is poetic; he is expert in all activities, and he is silent in nonsense. Similarly, in Srimad-Bhagavatam, Third Canto, Twenty-fifth Chapter, verse 21, the qualifications of a saintly person are mentioned. IT IS SAID THERE THAT A SAINTLY PERSON ELIGIBLE TO ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD IS VERY TOLERANT AND VERY KIND TO ALL LIVING ENTITIES. HE IS NOT PARTIAL; HE IS KIND BOTH TO HUMAN BEINGS AND TO ANIMALS. HE IS NOT SUCH A FOOL THAT HE WILL KILL A GOAT NARAYANA TO FEED A HUMAN NARAYANA, OR DARIDRA-NARAYANA. HE IS VERY KIND TO ALL LIVING ENTITIES; THEREFORE HE HAS NO ENEMY. HE IS VERY PEACEFUL. THESE ARE THE QUALITIES OF PERSONS WHO ARE ELIGIBLE TO ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD. That such a person gradually becomes liberated and enters the kingdom of God is confirmed in Srimad-Bhagavatam, Fifth Canto, Fifth Chapter, verse 2. The Srimad-Bhagavatam, Second Canto, Third Chapter, verse 24, also states that if a person does not cry or exhibit bodily changes after chanting the holy name of God without offense, it is to be understood that he is hardhearted and that therefore his heart does not change even after he chants the holy name of God, Hare Krsna. These bodily changes can take place due to ecstasy when we offenselessly chant the holy names of God: Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare Hare. Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare

730718BG.LON Lectures
NOT THIS RASCALDOM, DARIDRA-NARAYANA. JUST LIKE ONE RASCAL HAS MANUFACTURED THIS DARIDRA-NARAYANA. THE POOR MAN HAS BECOME NARAYANA, AND THE GOAT NARAYANA IS KILLED FOR THEIR FEEDING. NOT THIS KIND OF SADHU. SUHRDAM SARVA-BHUTANAM. A SADHU WILL NOT ALLOW ANY KIND OF KILLING. See in the Christian religion, it is first injunction is “Thou shalt not kill.” If you want to become religious… They are simply killing, and still, they are claiming “Christian.” What kind of Christian? Simply their business is killing. So it is very difficult to find out a Christian, although they are claiming, I am “Christian.” It is very difficult. Because their business is killing. And Lord Jesus Christ ordered, first order is, “Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt not covet.” Who is following?
So sadhu is suhrdam sarva-bhutanam. Why he should allow animal killing? They are also living entities, but for their benefit, the so-called sadhu says, “The animal has no soul.” What is this nonsense? Animal has no soul? Why? Why animal has… What is the difference between animal and man? What are the symptoms of possessing the soul? They are all equal. The man also eats, the animal also eats. The man also sleeps, the animal also sleeps, the man also have sex life, the animals also have sex life. The man also defends, the animals also defends. So where is the deficiency that you say that the animal has no soul?

741202SB.BOM Lectures
So how this can be possible? This suhrdah sarva-dehinam is possible when one has surrendered himself to the Supreme Being. On His account, because he has surrendered to the Supreme Being, he is friend to all living being. Artificially you cannot. Artificially you select some section, the poorer section, and worship him like Narayana, and you call him daridra-narayana. But a devotee, if he has got vision of Narayana, he will see the daridra-narayana, the rich Narayana, the chaga-narayana, and the every Narayana, panditah sama-darsinah. WHY A SECTION SHOULD BE CALLED NARAYANA? If you have got such broader vision, that you are seeing Narayana in everything, then what the rich man has done? He is also Narayana. And the goat has… He is also Narayana. The cow, he is also Narayana. Then you should… IF YOU HAVE SUCH BROADER VISION, THAT YOU SEE EVERYWHERE NARAYANA, THEN WHY SHOULD YOU SPECIFY A SECTION, DARIDRA-NARAYANA?

761025SB.VRN Lectures
So vimanyavah suhrdah sadhavah. Sadhavah. Sadhu. Generally sadhu means devotee. Otherwise not sadhu. Sadhavah sadhu-bhusanah. There is a description of sadhu also. That is suhrdah sarva-bhutanam ajata-satru sadhava sadhu-bhusanah titiksavah karunikam. THESE ARE THE SYMPTOMS OF SADHU. VERY TOLERANT AND KIND, TITIKSAVA-KARUNIKA. AND SUHRDAH SARVA-BHUTANAM: AND HE’S FRIEND OF ALL LIVING ENTITIES, NOT THAT DARIDRA-NARAYANA SEVA AND COW-NARAYANA KILLING. IF YOU HAVE GOT SUCH VISION THAT NARAYANA IS EVERYWHERE, WHY SHOULD YOU DISTINGUISH DARIDRA-NARAYANA, DHANI-NARAYANA, COW-NARAYANA, GOAT-NARAYANA? IT IS NOT THAT FOR THE HUMANKIND JUST LIKE IT IS GOING ON, NATIONALITY. WHAT IS THIS NONSENSE “NATIONALITY”? “NATIONALITY” MEANS ONE WHO IS BORN IN THAT COUNTRY. THIS IS THE GENERAL DEFINITION. SO WHY YOU ARE GIVING PROTECTION TO THE HUMAN BEING AND KILLING THE COWS AND GOATS? THEY ARE NOT NATIONAL? THIS MEANS SHORT-SIGHTED. BECAUSE THEY HAVEN’T GOT KRSNA CONSCIOUSNESS THEY ARE ALWAYS CRIPPLED. They do not know what is the meaning of nationalism, but they are pushing on nationalism. Rascalism.
Here is nationalism, that isavasyam idam sarvam: everything belongs to God. And Krsna says bhoktaram yajna-tapasam sarva-loka-mahesvaram. He’s the proprietor. He’s the proprietor; everyone is His subject. Everyone requires protection. That is nationalism. Not that crippled ideas: “I am good, my brother is good, and everyone is bad.” That is not nationalism. This is going on. My nation,

730126IN.CAL Lectures
Prabhupada: … and sat means om tat sat, the Absolute Truth. Sannyasa. (aside:) So stop that sound. So renouncement, simply giving up something, is not very good idea. You must have something better. Param drstva nivartate. If you get something better, then you give up something inferior. Our Vaisnava philosophy, renouncement means renouncement of sense gratification. THE MAYAVADA SANNYASA MEANS KARMA-TYAGA, SIMPLY READING VEDANTA PHILOSOPHY, SANKHYA PHILOSOPHY, AND EVERYTHING GIVEN UP. BUT OUR VAISNAVA PHILOSOPHY IS GIVING UP THE WRONG THING AND ACCEPTING THE RIGHT THING. SIDE BY SIDE. SIMPLY IF I GIVE UP, IT WILL NOT STAY VERY LONG TIME. IF I SIMPLY BY SENTIMENT GIVE UP, BRAHMA SATYAM JAGAN MITHYA, “THIS WORLD IS FALSE AND BRAHMAN IS THE REAL, REALITY,” SO THERE ARE SO MANY SANNYASIS, WE SEE, THEY GIVE UP THE SO-CALLED MITHYA WORLD AND COME TO THE BRAHMAN REALIZATION BY MEDITATION, BY MEDITATION, MEDITATION… THEN MEDITATION MEANS HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL. BECAUSE THERE IS NO BRAHMAN, THERE IS NO REALITY. SO AFTER MUCH MEDITATION, (HE) COMES TO THE CONCLUSION THAT “NOW I AM A SANNYASI. I MUST OPEN SCHOOLS, COLLEGE AND DARIDRA-NARAYANA SEVA AND GOAT-NARAYANA KILLING.” THIS KIND OF SANNYASA HAS NO MEANING. DARIDRA-NARAYANA SEVA. BY KILLING GOAT NARAYANA. GOAT IS NOT NARAYANA. SIMPLY DARIDRAS ARE NARAYANA. IF YOU ACCEPT ONE AS NARAYANA, WHY SHOULD YOU NOT ACCEPT THE OTHER AS NARAYANA?
SO THIS KIND OF FALSE SANNYASA IS NOT ACCEPTED BY THE VAISNAVAS. VAISNAVAS, THEY ACCEPT SANNYASA FOR BETTER ACTIVITIES. FOR BETTER ACTIVITIES MEANS DEDICATED LIFE FOR SATISFYING THE SUPREME LORD. MAM EKAM SARANAM VRAJA. ANYONE WHO HAS SACRIFICED HIS LIFE FOR KRSNA, HE’S SANNYASA. That is stated in the Bhagavad-gita: anasritah karma-phalam karyam karma karoti yah, sa sannyasi. Na niragnir na cakriyah. One who has given up… A sannyasi is not supposed to cook. Ni, niragnih. And na niragnir na yogi. But anasritah karma-phalam. Tyagi means karma-phala tyaga. This is tyaga, real tyaga. Suppose you are working. You are doing some business and getting lakhs of rupees’ profit. If you can give up that profit for Krsna, that is sannyasa. Otherwise, “I shall enjoy fully the profit and I have become a great devotee”? No. Sannyasa means, as it is stated, anasritah karma-phalam. Karma-phalam. There must be some karma-phala, whatever you do. There must be some result, bad or good. So anasritah, without taking shelter of the result of activities, karyam karma karo… “It is my duty.” Just like Arjuna did. Arjuna understood that Krsna wanted the fight. He took it, karyam, that “I, this, this, I must do. This I must do. Krsna wants it. Because my business is to satisfy Krsna. I cannot become nonviolent as I wanted to become falsely, ‘Krsna, I don’t want to fight with my cousin-brothers, my nephews, my grandfather.’ That was my sense gratification.” Krsna immediately said, “What kind of nonsense you are talking, that you won’t fight, won’t fight? This is not good.” Kutas tva kasmalam idam visame… “What kind of nonsense you are speaking? You have come to fight in the battlefield, and now you are talking that nonviolence. So don’t talk all this nonsense because you are My friend, My cousin-brother. It does not look well.” Anarya-justam asvargyam akirti-karam. “These things are done by the anaryas, not by a gentleman.” Anarya-justam akirti-karam. “You, this, this will be infamous for you. Don’t do like that.” Then He explained to him Bhagavad-gita. And when he understood, then he took sannyasa. What is that sannyasa? Karisye vacanam tava: “Yes, I’ll fight.” That’s all.

Conversations 710117rc.all

Room Conversation
—
January 17, 1971, Allahabad

Prabhupada: Vivekananda has influence here in higher class, among the educated class. They talk about Vivekananda and this and that, nonsense. In your country, fortunately, that opposition was not there. There was no influence of Vivekananda class men. Here amongst the educated class there is influence of all these rascals, Vivekananda, Aurobindo, and… That is one defect. But in the mass there is no influence. In the class, educated class. BECAUSE EDUCATED CLASS MEANS WINE, WOMEN, MEAT, AND VIVEKANANDA ALLOWS THIS. THAT IS THE POINT. VIVEKANANDA HAS NO DISTINCTION OF EATING. “EAT ANY… ALL BRAHMAN, ALL NARAYANA. YOU ARE NARAYANA. GOAT IS NARAYANA. SO NARAYANA IS GOING IN THE BELLY OF NARAYANA. WHAT IS THE WRONG? ONE NARAYANA IS GOING, BEING ABSORBED BY ANOTHER NARAYANA.” BUT HE IS NOT AGREEABLE TO BE EATEN BY A TIGER, ANOTHER TIGER NARAYANA.
Hamsaduta: They actually say that?
Prabhupada: Yes.
Hamsaduta: “One Narayana is being absorbed by another.”
Prabhupada: One respectable pleader in Allahabad, I said, “Why you are eating this?” We also find that he’s a very religious man. So I inquired. He was just like our father; still, I inquired. He said, “No, what is the wrong there? Narayana, Brahman. So one Brahman is going into the belly of another Brahman, Brahman being absorbed, brahmeti.” So they have got so dangerous theory. But still, we shall not hesitate to kick on their face but because they are making a propaganda, it should be peaceful. But I become very much agitated with this nonsense because I know they are creating havoc. Hare Krsna. Come on. (door closes) So many rascals. Hare Krsna Hare Krsna..

751220mw.bom Conversations
Dr. Patel: But sir, I want to ask a question. In Bhagavad-gita He says, “I am in them, and I am not in them also.” That means, sir, both His, all the beings are in the…

Prabhupada: No, “not in them” for the understanding of these rascals whose takes it that because Narayana is everyone, heart, then everyone is Narayana, daridra-narayana.

Dr. Patel: Not daridra.

Prabhupada: Or to warn these rascals, He says, “I am not there. I am not there.”

Dr. Patel: It is not like that, that He is there…

Prabhupada: Because he is a foolish man, if you say “Because Narayana is there, everyone is Narayana,” he will misunderstand. Therefore Krsna says, “No, I am not there.” Na caham tesv avasthitah. This is the…

Dr. Patel: Would it not be considered like this, sir, that He is in the Golok as well as here?

Prabhupada: Yes, Goloka, position of, goloka eva nivasaty akhilatma-bhuto, that is Krsna.

Dr. Patel: Akhilatma-bhuto.

Prabhupada: But don’t take that because akhilatma bhuto, Narayana is in the dog, therefore I have to worship dog. This is going on. Daridra-narayana. And why not dhani-narayana? What is the…. This foolishness is going on. And Narayana is everywhere. If you have such a, I mean to say, advanced vision, that Narayana is everywhere–that is also mentioned; therefore you should keep respect–then why do you make discrimination, that only daridra-narayana? Why not dhani-narayana?

Indian man: Last time you gave the example of the curd and the milk. That was very good example.

Prabhupada: Yes. Why the…, not dhani-narayana? Or the dog Narayana or the goat Narayana? Goat Narayana cut his throat; fish Narayana cut his throat…

Dr. Patel: Atmavat sarva-bhutesu, sir.

Prabhupada: These rascals are going on. Therefore Krsna says, “I am not there, naham tesv avasthitah,” to teach these rascals. Otherwise, they’ll misunder…

Dr. Patel: Does it not mean, sir, that naham tesv avasthitah, “I am staying in Goloka”?

Prabhupada: No, no. He says, maya tatam idam sarvam, “I am everywhere, but still I am not there.” Because these rascals will misunderstand.

Adi 7.103 Lord Caitanya in Five Features
MAYAVADI SANNYASIS ADDRESS EACH OTHER AS NARAYANA. Whenever they see another sannyasi, they offer him respect by calling om namo narayanaya (“I offer my respect unto you, Narayana”), although they know perfectly well what kind of Narayana he is. NARAYANA HAS FOUR HANDS, BUT ALTHOUGH THEY ARE PUFFED UP WITH THE IDEA OF BEING NARAYANA, THEY CANNOT EXHIBIT MORE THAN TWO. SINCE THEIR PHILOSOPHY DECLARES THAT NARAYANA AND AN ORDINARY HUMAN BEING ARE BOTH ON THE SAME LEVEL, THEY SOMETIMES USE THE TERM DARIDRA-NARAYANA (“POOR NARAYANA”), WHICH WAS INVENTED BY A SO-CALLED SVAMI WHO DID NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT VEDANTA PHILOSOPHY. Therefore although all these Mayavadi sannyasis who called themselves Narayana were actually unaware of the position of Narayana, due to their austerities Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu enabled them to understand Him to be Narayana Himself. Lord Caitanya is certainly the Supreme Personality of Godhead Narayana appearing as a devotee of Narayana, and thus the Mayavadi sannyasis, understanding that He was directly Narayana Himself whereas they were false, puffed-up Narayanas, spoke to Him as follows.