Bhakti Charu implicated in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning

6. July 2020 by Prabhupada News 18 Comments

Bhakti Charu implicated in Srila Prabhupadas poisoning

BHAKTI-CHARU.pdf
BHAKTI-CHARU.docx
BHAKTI-CHARU.html

Bhakticharu Swami is a prime suspect in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning: he was there when it happened, and he is contradicting his own recorded statements from 1977. That constitutes lying. Why is he lying? Thus he brings great suspicion upon himself. Bhakticharu has implicated himself in the poisoning by his dishonest, tricky statements. Any intelligent person can see he has something to hide.
Why was it in 1977 that he took seriously Srila Prabhupada’s talking of being poisoned, but did nothing about it, and now, decades later, he pretends that in 1977 he did not take Srila Prabhupada seriously? And in 2001 say it was alarming to think the food he was giving Srila Prabhupada was poisoned? Too many contradictions… Flip-flopping stories. Any crime investigator would zero in on Bhakticharu as top priority for intense interrogations.

CHAPTER 73:
BHAKTICHARU SWAMI

INTRODUCTION

“One day an unusual, young Bengali man came to Mayapur. Named Kishore Bhattacharya, he was a Vaishnava from birth and obviously intelligent. He spoke impeccable English and was also fluent in German because he was a [chemistry] student in a German university. With simply a little coaxing, he surrendered to Srila Prabhupada and quickly got initiated, receiving the name Ksira-cora-gopinatha dasa. On several occasions he kindly translated conversations between Pisima and me. Months later, Srila Prabhupada awarded this cultured young man sannyasa, changing his name to Bhakticharu Swami.” (Mahamaya dasi, Prabhupada Is Coming!)

BHAKTICHARU WAS VERY CLOSE TO TAMAL AND BHAVANANDA

From the time he joined ISKCON in early 1977, Bhakticharu was closely associated with Tamal and Bhavananda, who were both major influences on him. His first years in ISKCON were under the direct tutelage of both Tamal and Bhavananda. He took over Bhavananda’s room in the Lotus Building after Bhavananda left in 1987. He would sometimes visit with Tamal in Dallas. During Srila Prabhupada’s last nine months, Tamal was Srila Prabhupada’s personal secretary, and Bhakticharu was Tamal’s assistant for the last eight months, always present by bringing meals, drinks, medicines, and so on. Bhakticharu translated the Bengali and Hindi conversations of the day for Tamal, and acted as a nurse, caretaker, servant.

So, knowing the nature of Tamal and Bhavananda, we would begin to wonder why would Bhakticharu maintain lifelong friendship these kinds of people? Birds of a feather flock together…

Bhakticharu Swami was trained and nurtured by Tamal as a little brother, as a protégé, as a confidant and assistant. There is no doubt Tamal had Bhakticharu, a fresh new recruit, completely in his control and had an overwhelming influence on him. From Bhakticharu’s 2016 book Ocean Of Mercy, pgs. 89, 101, 126, and 153:

“One morning I saw a bright-looking personality walking with Bhavananda Maharaja. There was something striking about this devotee; I just could not keep my eyes off him. Tirthapada, who was standing next to me, said that it was Tamal Krsna Goswami. ‘He is one of the most prominent leaders of our movement.’ I had heard about Tamal Krsna Maharaja; he was a hero of ISKCON. He had joined in San Francisco when the movement was in its infancy and almost right away assumed a leadership role. Since then, Srila Prabhupada had called on him to lead his most important projects… Just the sight of Tamal Krsna Maharaja filled me with awe and reverence. I offered my obeisances from a distance. In the afternoon, when I was with Srila Prabhupada in his room, Maharaja walked in, and Prabhupada’s face lit up with a bright smile. Right away, they began to talk intimately.”

“It was quite an experience to be so close to [TKG]. Although we were sharing a room, I still held him in great reverence. In fact, he commanded this kind of respect from practically everyone in ISKCON… I would bow down to him, and he would embrace me. He had been my hero even before I had met him, and his closeness was like a dream- one that I had never imagined would come true… Rooming with Maharaja was one of my most memorable experiences… He always treated me lovingly… In his presence I was constantly learning new and important things… Bhavananda commented with a smile, ‘You are fortunate. Tamal is known for his temper. That’s why he is called Hot Tamale. Anyway, I can see that he has accepted you as his man… you are one of those fortunate souls who has won his favor.”

“…but [Tamal Krishna] Maharaja insisted that I stay with him, and I was delighted… to follow his wish.” “Tamal Krsna Maharaja asked Srila Prabhupada many questions- some about management and some on spiritual topics. I was amazed at how he would ask them, and I didn’t think I would ever be able to question Prabhupada in such a manner. One day I was sitting in Maharaja’s office chanting while he was editing letters that he’d typed on Prabhupada’s behalf. When he finished, he looked up and saw that I had been watching him, and he just smiled. I was already feeling deep appreciation for him, and when he smiled at me I couldn’t contain myself. ‘You are so brilliant,’ I said. ‘Whatever you do is so perfect.’”

Bhakticharu and Tamal were together in all things. Bhakticharu is Tamal’s “made man.” When Tamal passed away in Mayapura in 2002, and as was witnessed by many devotees including Prahladananda Swami, Bhakticharu Swami was sobbing and cried again and again, “It’s all over now… It’s all over now.”

When Srila Prabhupada returned to Bombay from London, Tamal immediately called for Bhakticharu to come from Vrindaban to help him as one of the “trusted caretakers.” Tamal wanted those to help him that he trusted, and that was Bhakticharu. Since we have found Tamal guilty of poisoning Srila Prabhupada beyond a reasonable doubt, it is incriminating for Bhakticharu that he was recalled by Tamal on October 3, ’77.

ONE: SARVABHAVANA CONFIRMS BHAKTICHARU SPOKE OF THE POISONING

In 1970 Bhakticharu was a student at a university in Hamburg, Germany, studying chemistry. One of his Indian friends at this Hamburg university joined the movement before he did and was initiated as Sarvabhavana das. Bhakticharu went to the ISKCON Hamburg temple for some time. Years later Bhakticharu joined at Mayapur at the invitation of Sarvabhavana das, and they have been close friends through the years. In 2002 Sarvabhavana das was privately recorded by Sakshi Gopal das stating the following:

“He’s been telling me for the last 24 years that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned. He even told me he suspected Srila Prabhupada was being poisoned before he left this world. Now he is denying. What is my gain or loss to say this? Bhakticharu Maharaja may remember that I introduced him to Krishna Consciousness and to the lotus feet of Srila Prabhupada. Why is he saying lies? Why is he denying like this?”

This is the first person claiming that Bhakticharu Swami knew about Srila Prabhupada being poisoned. Whether Sarvabhavana das will confirm this again is dubious, as he has much at stake with definite repercussions from ISKCON leadership if he were to publicly make such a statement. But this is what he reluctantly told a former member of the private investigation committee in India around 2003.

TWO: BHAKTICHARU SWAMI TOLD PURI MAHARAJA SR THAT HE KNEW?

In 2003 an ISKCON devotee from Holland reported that a close friend, initiated by the elder Puri Maharaja, had been told by the new head of that matha (organization) that some years earlier Bhakticharu Swami had approached Puri Maharaja confidentially. Supposedly Bhakticharu Swami sought counsel in distress- he knew of Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning and was unsure of what to do, now that it had become a public issue. This report is unsubstantiated and is technically “hearsay,” just a rumor. However, we find there is so much hearsay or indirect evidence that it all adds up to a lot of smoke, and where there’s smoke, there’s often fire, so further verification and investigation is warranted.

THREE: IN 1977 & 2001 BHAKTICHARU SWAMI ADMITS
SRILA PRABHUPADA SPOKE OF POISONING,

BUT IN 2000 BHAKTICHARU SWAMI DECLARES
POISONING ALLEGATIONS TO BE ABSURD

Then, from Bhakticharu himself, a statement was made in Europe around 2001: “It’s just natural when you get such shocking complaints from Srila Prabhupada, who is very dear to you and he just happened to be the person you thought you were serving lovingly, then suddenly, the food you gave him might have been poisoned!” Here Bhakticharu Swami is acknowledging his understanding in 1977 that Srila Prabhupada was speaking to him about being poisoned, and he thought it would be through the very food that he was giving to Srila Prabhupada. He did not say it was due to bad medicine as he and the ISKCON leaders now claim.

Also, on Nov.10, 1977, when Srila Prabhupada again said that someone had poisoned him, Bhakticharu exclaimed aloud to the others in the small room: “Someone gave him poison here!” And when Tamal asked him, “Prabhupada was thinking that someone had poisoned him?” and Bhakticharu replied, “Yes.”

However, in 2000 Bhakticharu had decided much differently about Srila Prabhupada’s 1977 statements.“When I first heard about this allegation (poisoning) I considered it to be so absurd that I did not think it deserved any response. I could not even imagine that anyone with a rational mind would give any credence to such an allegation.” Would Srila Prabhupada’s 1977 allegations of poisoning be also considered absurd by Bhakticharu Swami?

Also in 1999, Bhakticharu Swami told Nityananda das that he did not take srila Prabhupada’s statements about poisoning seriously because he though those who were poisoned turned blue…!

RECAP: 1977: poisoning acknowledged. 1999: did not take Srila Prabhupada seriously as he did not turn blue. 2000:poisoning idea is absurd. 2001: the food he gave to Srila Prabhupada may have been poisoned.

COMMENTS ON BHAKTICHARU ONLINE STATEMENT OCTOBER 4, 1999

Below we will comment piece by piece the statement made in the GBC denial, cover-up book (2000):

“Recently one of our god-brothers, Nityananda das, wrote a book, “Someone has Poisoned Me” and alleged that the cause of Srila Prabhupada’s disappearance from this planet is arsenic poisoning, and the ones who were serving His Divine Grace at that time administered him that poison. Since I was one of Srila Prabhupada’s personal servants at that time, taking care of his food and medicines, according to that book, I am naturally a suspect.

COMMENT: Now, years later, we know that the primary poison administered was actually cadmium, and that the arsenic was somehow secondary. The cadmium levels are extremely high, much more so than the arsenic. We see that right at the start of his statement that he is more concerned about the supposed accusations against the senior men, of which he is one, than he is about whether Srila Prabhupada was really poisoned, or what Srila Prabhupada meant when he himself several times spoke of being poisoned. And, yes, anyone with half a head would naturally suspect those who were serving Srila Prabhupada. Or should we start by looking in the Himalayas or Africa first? Obviously the servants had a strong motive as they stood to inherit the society and guruhood as soon as Srila Prabhupada departed. Further, it is not a book that threw suspicions upon Srila Prabhupada’s servants, it was the evidence that was contained in the book.

“When I first heard about this allegation I considered it to be so absurd that I did not think it deserved any response. I could not even imagine that anyone with a rational mind would give any credence to such an allegation. However, yesterday I received a com message from Hari Sauri, one of Srila Prabhupada’s personal servants and the author of The Transcendental Diary, saying, ‘The (poison) issue must be dealt with directly… That must include direct statements from yourself (Tamal Krsna Goswami), Bhakti Caru, Bhavananda, Jayapataka et al. When the persons that were there present their experiences collectively it makes a very powerful statement. I want to repeat, it MUST be done.’ Therefore, I felt somewhat compelled to write this statement.

COMMENT: But in 1977 no one thought the issue that Srila Prabhupada himself had raised about how he thought he was being poisoned was absurd. Why in 2000 does Bhakticharu think it has become absurd? Why did Tamal ask Srila Prabhupada, “So who is it that has poisoned?” rather than saying, “Srila Prabhupada, you are being absurd with these statements of being poisoned!” Bhakticharu asked in 1977 with these words: “Who said, Srila Prabhupada?” He did not think the matter absurd then. How is it that Bhakticaru cried out on tape on Nov. 11, 1977, “Someone has poisoned him!” and then became silent until Hari-Sauri’s call-to-action 23 years later? Does he deny that he confessed his concerns about Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning to Sarvabhavana Prabhu?

“Just in case you do not know me and wondering why Hari Sauri is asking me to address this issue, I will give a brief introduction about myself- I am one of the last disciples of Srila Prabhupada. I met His Divine Grace in Jan. ‘77. In March, in Mayapur, he gave me first and second initiations. He personally appointed me as his secretary for Indian affairs. […] in May, he gave me sannyas […] I had the good fortune to serve His Divine Grace’s transcendental body until his disappearance pastime from this planet.

“From Srila Prabhupada we learnt that a Vaishnava does not defend himself. Therefore I will not try to defend myself, however it is my solemn duty to defend those who are innocent, with my honest testimony. The author is accusing TKG as the main suspect. […] how well Nityananda dasa knows TKG and how closely he associated with him, but I had the opportunity to associate with him very closely and lived with him for about 7 months. During those days I saw what a deep love and respect he had for Srila Prabhupada, and I also saw what a deep confidence His Divine Grace had in him.

COMMENT: Rather than discussing the value of Srila Prabhupada’s statements about being poisoned, where the heavy metals came from that were in Srila Prabhupada’s hair, or the whispers about poisoning while he is feeding Srila Prabhupada milk, and which have been forensically verified by numerous forensic analysts to be about homicidal poisoning, Bhakticharu tries to divert us to an emotional appeal about how Tamal loved Srila Prabhupada. When Bhakticharu heard the kaviraja in late 1977 say, “Some demon has given him poison,” did he protest, “No, this is impossible because everyone loves Srila Prabhupada”? Also there are questions about the “deep love” for Srila Prabhupada: “ati bhakti corera lakshana:” (CC Madhya: 17.15) Too much devotion is the sign of a thief. As far as defending oneself, we see that Tamal had organized many devotees to defend himself so he wouldn’t need to.

“Tamal has a very heavy side but one should not judge him only from that point of view. He has a very soft side as well. Anyone who knows him knows well how aggressive and demanding he can be and to live with him was not always easy for me. Yet I have seen his other side also and I have many sweet memories of my days with him. I have received elder brotherly affection from him that created a deep bond between us. Although we experienced our differences, our relationship remained intact. I have seen many a times some devotees carry an inaccurate image of other devotees that obscure their perception.”

COMMENT: Bhakticharu thinks that the evidence that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned should be analyzed and evaluated starting with a discussion about how Tamal was really a very devoted disciple? Naturally Bhakticharu wants to defend Tamal, because if Tamal is guilty, then the assistant is likely also guilty. As said in Judge For Yourself: “a seven month time-span for the’elder brother’ to mentally exert, psychologically subjugate, plan, execute, justify, and brainwash his subordinate sibling with promises of a higher life and eventual gurudom.” Bhakticharu became an ISKCON initiating guru in 1987 as the eighth addition to the original eleven GBC-guru power elite after he had been a devotee only for 10 years. Many believe that he had been promised this position early on by his mentor Tamal. It is no wonder that he goes on record defending the big brothers who brought him into such an exalted, prestigious club. In his essay “Spiritual Connections” Bhakticaru confesses: “Tamal Krishna Maharaja was one of my most prominent spiritual connections to Srila Prabhupada. Under his guidance I served His Divine Grace during his final pastimes.” What this tells us is that he was simply following Tamal’s instructions. Also how “very heavy, demanding, and aggressive” was Tamal? Enough to be a poisoner behind the façade of “deep love”?

“It is quite interesting to note that although Nityananda das wrote one whole book based on some whispers and an incorrect and dubious analysis of some hairs, he was nowhere near Srila Prabhupada in those days in Vrindavan. If he was, he would have seen how absurd his suspicion and accusation is.

COMMENT: At least Nityananda das is eliminated as a suspect since he was not there in those last months. The belittling of the evidence as “some whispers” and a”dubious analysis of some hairs” at least admits more than Bir Krishna Swami did in Slovenia, saying, “There’s no evidence that Prabhupada was poisoned.” Actually the evidence is very substantial, if anyone has the time to actually look at it.

If he was present then he would have seen, what to speak of poisoning Srila Prabhupada, the devotees around Srila Prabhupada were praying to Krishna to let Srila Prabhupada stay on this planet in exchange of their lives. It is extremely unfortunate that Nityananda das is so obsessed with some whispers, but he is not listening to the exchanges that are so loud and clear. If he was present there…

COMMENT: “praying to Krishna to let Srila Prabhupada stay on the planet in exchange of their lives.” Yes, and Srila Prabhupada also said at that time the exact opposite: “You are all here praying for me to live and ‘they’ are in the next room praying for me to die.” (spoken to Panchadravida, Upendra, and Srutakirti, all as separate confirmations)

…then he would have seen that just a couple of days before Srila Prabhupada left this planet he told his very intimate god-brother, Srila Krsnadasa Babaji Maharaja, with tears rolling down from his eyes, “See, how much they love me! If he (Nityananda das) was attending Srila Prabhupada in the early hours in Vrindavan, he would have heard Srila Prabhupada as soon as his Divine Grace woke up, “Where is Tamal? Ask him to come to me.” And then he would have seen a very sweet loving exchange between them. Srila Prabhupada talking to him about the affairs of the movement, his various concerns about the future of this movement and what should be done to protect this movement.

COMMENT: The first thing Bhakticharu should have done to protect Srila Prabhupada and the movement was to call the police after Srila Prabhupada told him he was being poisoned. Where was Tamal’s “deep love” then? Does “See how much they love me” change the fact Srila Prabhupada said “Someone has poisoned me”?

“If Nityananda das was present there then he would have also seen that there were hundreds of devotees whose hearts were so full with their love for Srila Prabhupada that they were prepared to do anything for him. There were personalities like Gurukripa, who used to attend Srila Prabhupada everyday from 12 midnight to 2 in the morning. If Srila Prabhupada really suspected that someone had poisoned him, then all he had to do is just tell Gurukripa. Anyone who knows Gurukripa knows what would have happened then. And it is not only Gurukripa, Srila Prabhupada had to just tell any one of the few hundred devotees that were there and one can only imagine what the reaction would have been like.

COMMENT: All the evidence is dismissed because Srila Prabhupada was pleased with his loving disciples? Nityananda das, along with most of the rest of the devotees at that time, was not told about Srila Prabhupada’s request that all his disciples come to see him. This was due to concealment of the Acharya’s wishes by top men including Tamal and Hari Sauri. Besides, there is no doubt Srila Prabhupada was surrounded by loving disciples, but does that mean a poisoning could not take place? Or that amongst all those loving disciples there could not be someone who was a poisoner? Whoever did it, that comes second to understanding that the crime actually occurred, a crime now proven beyond doubt, and a crime that was not prevented by all the loving disciples being present. Also, why does Bhakticharu mention what Gurukripa would do if Srila Prabhupada told him he was being poisoned, something that Srila Prabhupada told Bhakticharu, Tamal, Bhavananda, and others, all who did nothing?

“Those who are suspecting that Srila Prabhupada has been poisoned by some of his disciples, I will request them to go deep within their hearts and ask whether it is at all possible for a Vaishnava, who does not even kill an ant, to murder his spiritual master. One evening I was with Tamal in our room. A mosquito was sucking his blood sitting on his leg. It had become quite… [Suddenly] Tamal aware of that mosquito. His hand rose in a natural reflex to strike that little creature, but stopped all of a sudden, then it came down slowly and flicked the mosquito away from his leg. The person who would not even kill the mosquito that was sucking his blood, how can anyone think that he gave poison to his spiritual master?

COMMENT: The issue is not about Tamal’s mosquito attitude; it is about the evidence presented in 700 pages of this book. Bhakticharu cannot answer that evidence, so he talks about mosquitoes instead!

“Srila Prabhupada went to Vrindavan in May from Hrisikesa to leave his body. Everyone present there was aware of that. The conspiracy to eliminate him was not the reality, rather the reality was intense prayer to Krishna not to let Srila Prabhupada go away from their midst. I personally learnt a wonderful lesson from this allegation. I must have developed some pride due to my good fortune in serving Srila Prabhupada those days. Now Krishna, the destroyer of pride, is mercifully taking care of that. While I, due to my false ego, was feeling proud that I served Krsna’s pure devotee, the world is seeing me as the one who gave him poison. It is indeed Krishna’s causeless mercy. “I used to feel very impressed by one statement of Srila Prabodhananda Saraswati, a very intimate associate of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, ‘If the whole world glorifies me but Krishna does not recognise me then what is the use of that glorification. If the whole world spits at me but Krishna recognises me then who cares about that spitting.’ Very mercifully Krishna is giving me the opportunity to apply this wonderful instruction in my own life. This allegation is making me aware about the futility of mundane adoration and importance of Krishna’s recognition. No matter what the world thinks, Krishna knows everything. Therefore what is the use of worrying about my image in this world? After all, sitting in my heart Krishna knows about all that I think and do. The conditioned souls of this material world may make mistakes in their judgement, but Krishna will never make any mistake. I have taken shelter of Him and surrendered myself unto Him, now let Him decide what I deserve.

COMMENT: OK, let’s get out the wailing violins; the heartstrings are really being pulled here. From the evidence that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned with heavy metals, Bhakticharu only extracts a “let’s feel sorry for the good guys who are being unfairly accused” storyline. Only dummies fall for this. This is a favorite device of illogic used by deceivers: defend something which is not the subject at hand.

“To this world I will declare clear and loudly, ‘It is an absolutely absurd allegation that Srila Prabhupada has been poisoned by his disciples. If anyone intentionally poisoned Srila Prabhupada, then it must be me because those days I was the only one who used to give prasad and medicine to His Divine Grace. Whatever he ate and drank went through my hand.’ If someone wants to take me to the mundane court also, he can do so. There also I will give the same testimony, ‘It is an absolutely absurd allegation that Srila Prabhupada has been poisoned by his disciples. If anyone intentionally poisoned Srila Prabhupada, then it must be me because those days I was the only one who used to give prasad and medicine to His Divine Grace. Whatever he ate and drank went through my hand.’

COMMENT: Would it be absurd to determine that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned? The hair tests confirm that he was. Now who did it? A witch on a broom who rode in from the clouds? Well, by Bhakticharu’s logic and admission, it must be him. Srila Prabhupada was poisoned, so therefore he did it, by his own reasoning. Instead of looking at the evidence that Srila Prabhupada was indeed poisoned, Bhakticharu would rather approach the issue this way: Since Srila Prabhupada was surrounded by loving disciples, it is impossible that he could have been poisoned. Bhakticharu should not apply to enter detective school because his logic is not suited to solve anything. The hair tests show a definite malicious poisoning, so not all that surrounded Srila Prabhupada were totally full of love. The devious will always try to divert the discussion to emotional secondary issues such as how unfair it is to suspect those who loved Srila Prabhupada. Bhakticharu only states that he and his friends did not do it, but does not argue against the poisoning itself. Emotions aside, let us look at the poisoning evidence to understand that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned. Then we can ask who do it.

“Let the omniscient, omnipotent Supreme Personality of Godhead judge me. If I committed such a heinous crime towards the most dear devotee of the Lord, to whom I owe everything, including my very existence, then let me suffer eternally in the darkest region of the hell. If any of Srila Prabhupada’s disciples, whose heart is steeped with his love for Srila Prabhupada, wants to take the law in his hand and judge me, I will welcome that also. I give him full freedom to judge and do whatever he wants to do with me. I can assure him that I will accept that judgement without any protest. Waiting to receive your judgement and aspiring to remain a servant of the Vaishnavas. Bhakti Caru Swami.”

COMMENT: This is a bluff. Even though asked questions many times by our private investigators, he has not been forthcoming. These empty, blustery words are only a show to impress gullible people. He will not agree to polygraph or voice stress tests, interviews, questions, nothing. The whispers, the obstinate and slippery denials, the hair tests, the motive for the crime, the history of the insane zonal acaryas, the “mercy-killing” interview, the concealments, the character of some senior men, Srila Prabhupada’s own statements about being poisoned… this is what needs to be recognized as valid evidence which implicates Tamal, Jayapataka, Bhavananda, and Bhakticharu. For all of the false humility and denials, we come away with six key facts that will haunt Bhakticharu and company beyond their deaths: (1). Even after acknowledging that Srila Prabhupada had been poisoned, Bhakticharu never reported it to the authorities. (2). He backed Tamal in their secret meeting where it was decided, despite what Srila Prabhupada had said about being poisoned, that there was no poisoning. (3). He was part of the conspiracy to keep the Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning revelations secret until its discovery two decades later. (4). He still (on and off) denies that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned, even though he acknowledged that Srila Prabhupada said he was poisoned. (5). He has done nothing more than hide behind the GBC produced book (NTIAP) of which his worthless statement above is a part. (6). He has done nothing to assist an investigation or prove his innocence, and as a suspect, he paid to publish the GBC book which was a white-wash cover-up.

Bhakticharu Swami’s statement that ”If anyone intentionally poisoned Srila Prabhupada, then it must be me.” For many homicide detectives, they would consider that to be the start of a confession, at least opening the door for continued interrogation. We believe you. Now, tell us more…

BHAKTICHARU SWAMI MAKES ANOTHER STATEMENT LATER

Some time later, Bhakticharu Swami made another statement, this time shifting from emotions to some new and weird reasons why he did not take Srila Prabhupada’s speaking of being poisoned seriously. This is the big problem- not taking Srila Prabhupada seriously (see Ch. 57).

“During Srila Prabhupada’s last days he mentioned about poison soon after Makaradhvaja was given to him. That was about three weeks before his disappearance pastimes. At that time, I felt that the effect of that medicine may have been detrimental to his condition and therefore he spoke in that way. The next time he spoke about poison was a few days before his disappearance.

COMMENT: We have already discussed in Ch. 18 that Srila Prabhupada was NOT referring to bad medicine when he spoke of being poisoned on Nov. 10-11, 1977. He had discontinued the makaradhvaja after perhaps three doses around October 27. For over 10 days there was no more talk of makharadhvaja, and then we are led to believe that the Nov 10-11 “poison discussions” (see Ch. 12) were about the makharadhvaja being bad medicine? Then why did Srila Prabhupada not mention the makharadhvaja or medicines when speaking of being poisoned? Thus Bhakticharu, above, diverts attention to bad medicine to mislead people with a totally deceitful hoax of an excuse.

At that time according to the instruction of the Kaviraja from Calcutta, I was just giving Srila Prabhupada milk diluted with water and sweetened with sugar candy. The Ayurvedic doctor was gradually increasing the quantity of milk. He informed us that the milk intake would cure Srila Prabhupada. Personally I did not notice any unusual bodily symptoms in Srila Prabhupada. He used to lie on the bed all the time. Sometimes he used to express some discomfort from lying on his back all the time. Therefore, he used to ask us to turn him on his side. At that time his body had become so delicate that we had to help him to turn to his side very carefully. If we were not extremely careful he would feel pain. Two or 3 days before his disappearance, His Divine Grace mentioned a pain in his left thigh and he also mentioned about poison again.

The day he left his body sometime during late morning or early afternoon it seemed that the pain in his left thigh became so acute that he started to writhe. By that time he had stopped speaking. The last time he spoke was the night before, at about 12 o’clock, and he told the Ayurvedic doctor from Calcutta about some discomfort he was feeling. When Prabhupada started writhing in pain, making some faint moaning sound, Bhavananda Maharaja, who was sitting on the bed next to him held him tightly and from that time onwards Srila Prabhupada became very still and practically did not move at all. From time to time he only opened his mouth and I poured some Yamuna water, which he drank with great relish. Although his body became totally still, yet his tongue was constantly vibrating. Srila Krishnadasa Babaji Maharaja, a god-brother of His Divine Grace, pointed out that Srila Prabhupada was chanting the holy name incessantly. Besides this, his body did not display any unusual symptoms.

Although His Divine Grace spoke about poison, I could not take it seriously for two reasons:

1. The Ayurvedic doctor was present, and as Prabhupada displayed quite a lot of confidence in him, I felt if Srila Prabhupada was really poisoned then this doctor would have detected it.

2. I was under the impression that when someone is given poison then his body becomes blue.

COMMENT: OK, here we have more subterfuge and twisting of things as a clear act of deception. He could not take Srila Prabhupada’s speaking of being poisoned seriously because the doctor did not detect it? This means putting more faith in what the doctor missed than what Srila Prabhupada, the pure devotee who knows past, present, and future, is actually saying? This sounds like a really lame excuse. Further, in the actual conversations we find that the doctor/kaviraja DID believe Srila Prabhupada, and spoke of a rakshasa or demon who had poisoned Srila Prabhupada. Yet Bhakticharu seems to have forgotten all this? No, he has not forgotten, but he is counting on us to not read the 1977 conversations so he can say nonsense. Also, whoever the poisoners were, they had chosen cadmium, a highly undetectable poison, so it is rather strange for Bhakticharu to say because the doctor did not detect it, he was unconcerned (even after Srila Prabhupada himself had detected or ascertained his poisoning.) Does Bhakticharu think poisoning is so easily detected even by doctors? No, poisonings are very hard to detect. Bhakticharu’s idea about the body turning blue is something a 7 year old would believe, not the chemistry major from a German university that he is. Who could come up with such a daffy defense? Is he playing dumb with us? So because Srila Prabhupada did not turn blue, then Bhakticharu concluded that Srila Prabhupada’s statements about being poisoned are… what? Senility?

However, at that time Srila Prabhupada’s body became very shiny, almost golden, and he did not display any sign of pain or unusual discomfort. Apart from his usual unhealthy condition, Srila Prabhupada was quite normal. All the time he used to quietly lie on the bed very calm and composed. Sometimes he used to give advice to the senior leaders about how to manage the society; form different trusts and what to do with the funds. His consciousness was so clear that it was obvious that he was transcendentally situated. Even though he was only a few days away from leaving his body, his voice was very strong and resonant. Those of us who were present around him at that time were convinced that he was a completely spiritual personality and he was just displaying his disappearance pastime.

COMMENT: Bhakticharu saw Srila Prabhupada as a completely spiritual personality who said someone was poisoning him, a statement he could not take seriously? So why did Srila Prabhupada say that? Bhakticharu makes no sense, and that’s how a liar is trapped, by his own contradictions. The more they talk the better, as they eventually tie themselves up in their own web of lies and contradictions. Also, what does “quite normal,” “apart from his usual unhealthy condition” mean? This is bewildering.

One day, after checking his pulse, the Ayurvedic doctor, Damodara Prasad Shastri, told Prabhupada that he was completely surprised while treating him. At one moment his pulse was so weak that it seemed as if he was about to leave his body, and the next moment it was strong and healthy as that of a young man. He also told Prabhupada that he was only displaying his pastimes. From another point of view, we also saw that he was having difficulties with his kidneys. As a result of that, his legs and the back of his palms were swelling up. When the medicine started to work the swelling went down. He obviously had some kidney problems and the doctors gave medicines accordingly.

[Also there] was a mistake on our part, yet we could not really do anything about it. One night […] in Hrsikesa, he told me that the time had come for him to leave his body and he wanted us to make arrangements to take him to Vrindavana. I ran downstairs and woke up Tamal […] When Tamal came to His Divine Grace he repeated the same words […]the following morning we took His Divine Grace to Vrindavana. […] after he settled down in his quarters, he told me not to cook for him anymore, or force him to eat anything. I felt [he] was preparing to leave his body […] without eating and drinking anything.

[…] many leaders came to Vrindavana. When they requested him, with tears in their eyes, to continue to stay, His Divine Grace agreed. Once again I started to cook for him and he started to eat. One day he asked me to fetch an Ayurvedic doctor called Vanamali Kaviraja from Gopinath Bazaar. As a result of the treatment by that doctor, Srila Prabhupada’s condition started to improve. However, when his health improved, His Divine Grace wanted to go to the West to preach. When Vanamali Kaviraja got to know […] he requested me not to let him go. He told me that his medicine was working and Srila Prabhupada’s condition was improving. He said Srila Prabhupada’s condition was not completely healthy yet. He was planning to give Srila Prabhupada Makaradhvaja, during winter, which would rejuvenate him completely. He mentioned that Srila Prabhupada’s condition was not strong enough to absorb Makaradhvaja because it was a very strong medicine. He planned to give it to him in winter, by that time Srila Prabhupada’s health would become strong enough to absorb it, and the cold weather would help.

I was just a new devotee at the time and when I saw that Srila Prabhupada was so determined to go to the West I could not really make a strong enough endeavor to stop him from going. However, in London his condition deteriorated so much that he had to come back after about a week-long stay. Vanamali Kaviraja resumed his treatment but Srila Prabhupada’s condition had deteriorated so much that his medicine did not work and he stopped the treatment. Vanamali Kaviraja did not want to give Makaradhvaja when Srila Prabhupada’s health was so much better before he went to the West. However, it was administered to him only about three weeks before his disappearance when his condition was much worse than that time. Also, it was administered by a doctor from Delhi who never even saw him. Soon after that Srila Prabhupada started to speak about poison. Therefore it seemed to me that he was speaking about the adverse effect of Makaradhvaja. After Srila Prabhupada’s disappearance I often used to lament internally – why didn’t I stop him from going to the West? Why I didn’t I tell the GBC members and senior devotees present in Vrindavana at that time what Vanamali Kaviraja told me? Why didn’t I stop them from giving Srila Prabhupada Makaradhvaja that was brought from Delhi and given by a doctor who did not even see him? Now I cannot do anything about it besides lamenting about my uselessness.” (END)

Comment: Again, Bhakticharu refers to the October makharadhvaja as the poison that Srila Prabhupada was speaking of. See Ch. 18. One who reads the conversations from Nov. 10-11 when Srila Prabhupada was speaking repeatedly about being poisoned, it is clear that he is NOT referring to any medicine. And we would think Bhakticharu, out of all others, would be most familiar with these talks since he was there! His long-winded, self-serving lamentation is but a dishonest defense, for what? What is it that he cannot be honest about? It is just so obvious that he is hiding something, that he will not speak truthfully. Also his historical event sequence is jumbled and inaccurate; Bhakticharu needs to refresh by reading the conversations. And as far as the Delhi kaviraja prescribing medicine without even seeing Srila Prabhupada, that is the least of it. The real concern should be that this medicine was personally arranged by the notorious Chandra Swami (Ch. 75).

SUMMARY ON BHAKTICHARU SWAMI’S ABOVE TESTIMONY

After 22+ years, finally Bhakticharu was compelled to make some statements regarding why he and other caretakers did NOTHING when Srila Prabhupada spoke repeatedly about being poisoned on Nov 10-11, 1977. Better late than never. Hopefully Maharaja will answer the many questions that will be put to him and others as this investigation proceeds, but we are not expecting he will. There are 7 points regarding this second statement from him:

(1). That Maharaja did not see any unusual health symptoms or that Srila Prabhupada did not turn blue, and therefore there was no poisoning, means nothing: heavy metal poisoning symptoms are practically unrecognizable even to trained doctors. Of course there were kidney problems: that is what heavy metals directly exacerbate. Maharaja should consult with his toxicologist disciple in New York.

(2). Srila Prabhupada said three times that he was being poisoned, and the kaviraja said that if Srila Prabhupada said it, there must be truth to it. Why did Maharaja not take it seriously?

(3). Srila Prabhupada’s voice was definitely not strong and resonant during his last months with us. Listen to the tapes, read the health history: it was hoarse, raspy, weak. These are signs of heavy metal poisoning.

(4). Why does he not mention anything of the sudden and drastic attack of illness Srila Prabhupada experienced in Hrishikesh, which was what made Srila Prabhupada think he was about to die?

(5). That Maharaja says he thinks Srila Prabhupada’s statements about being poisoned referred to the makharadhvaja is a dishonesty and a tired, old strategy to confuse his listeners.

(6). Contrary to Bhakticharu himself, the kaviraja took Srila Prabhupada’s statements that he was being poisoned very seriously, and said it must be true. Bhakticharu’s claims are contradictory.

(7). Rather than lamenting about giving makharadhvaja when maybe it wasn’t the best idea, Bhakticharu should lament about not taking (even today!) Srila Prabhupada’s statements seriously.

(8). That Srila Prabhupada appeared “quite normal” to Bhakticharu only means that the slow poisoning was chronic, not apparent. Did he ever wonder about all the different diagnoses from the parade of doctors, and why no medicine or care program seemed to be effective?

PHONE INTERVIEW WITH BHAKTICHARU SWAMI IN 1998

From Nityananda das: “In early 1998 Bhakticharu Swami made a statement on VNN.org that Srila Prabhupada could not have been poisoned because he did not turn blue. Yet when I interviewed him by phone in North Carolina in late 1998, he said that after Srila Prabhupada said he was poisoned, no one followed up on it, although he thinks the matter should have been looked into. This reveals three contradictory positions when compared to his other testimonies.

One, that Srila Prabhupada was not poisoned (even though he said he was being poisoned) because he did not turn blue.

Two, that when Srila Prabhupada said he was being poisoned, they should have looked into it.

Three, that everything was ok after all because Srila Prabhupada said, ‘Not that I am poisoned,’ even though the next day he again said he was being poisoned.

“Does it make any sense? Actually, when we study what Bhakticharu has said and done in relation to the poison issue, we find a necklace comprised of the jewels of suspicion, complicity, contradiction, dishonesty, and duplicity. This is all being noted down and organized for judgement day.”

INSINCERE ABOUT THE POISON ISSUE

Naveen Krishna das had resigned from the GBC body in March 2000 after seeing the GBC response to the poison issue in the form of their book Not That I Am Poisoned. A few months later, Bhakticharu came alone to visit Naveen at his home in Alachua. The conversation followed these lines:

BCHARU: Why did you resign? Why don’t you come back? You have left very important services…

NAVEEN: I left because I lost all trust in the GBC. The book they produced on the poison issue is full of lies, fraud, deception, and my conscience won’t allow me to work in an organization that refuses to recognize the serious evidence that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned. You yourself admitted in 1977 that Srila Prabhupada thought he was poisoned.

BCHARU: Well, Srila Prabhupada thought some of the medicines were acting like poison.

NAVEEN: Maharaja, that explanation does not conform to the actual conversations involving yourself, Srila Prabhupada, Tamal, the last kaviraja, and others in late 1977. For example…

(From memory, Naveen listed many of the discussions in Srila Prabhupada’s last days and how all the participants, including Bhakticharu Swami, acknowledged that Srila Prabhupada thought he had been poisoned. Tamal asked Srila Prabhupada who had done it. These transcripts are in Part Two.)

NAVEEN: So, Maharaja, you and I both know that Srila Prabhupada thought he was being poisoned. The GBC has done a great wrong by neglecting to honestly investigate this issue and the new evidence.

BCHARU: Well, do you suggest that we should re-open the investigation?

NAVEEN: Yes, definitely. A number of senior devotees believe this also, and we are prepared to form an impartial commission for that purpose. Will you please agree to be on the commission?

BCHARU: We need people like Ambarisha, Sesa, yourself, and then I could be part of it.

NAVEEN: OK, you please think it over and be sure. Let me know in a few days so we can get started.

BCHARU: Yes, I’ll let you know soon.

Naveen never heard back from Bhakticharu Swami again. This proves Bhakticharu’s insincerity about the poison issue. He is inconsistent, sometimes saying there was a poisoning (1977), and then sometimes saying it is a ludicrous idea (2000). He makes dishonest statements like, “the medicine was the poison” and “I thought someone who is poisoned would turn blue.”

Bhakticharu Swami is a prime suspect in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning: he was there when it happened, and he is contradicting his own recorded statements from 1977. That constitutes lying. Why is he lying? Thus he brings great suspicion upon himself. Bhakticharu has implicated himself in the poisoning by his dishonest, tricky statements. Any intelligent person can see he has something to hide.
Why was it in 1977 that he took seriously Srila Prabhupada’s talking of being poisoned, but did nothing about it, and now, decades later, he pretends that in 1977 he did not take Srila Prabhupada seriously? And in 2001 say it was alarming to think the food he was giving Srila Prabhupada was poisoned? Too many contradictions… Flip-flopping stories. Any crime investigator would zero in on Bhakticharu as top priority for intense interrogations.

ABHINANDA DAS REMEMBERS FROM 1977

Abhinanda das remembers that on the morning on November 15, 1977, in Vrindaban, while he was working hard by digging the Samadhi pit for Srila Prabhupada, that “Bhakticharu Swami came to him in a panicky mood, crying and weeping heavily,” and asked, “Where is the kaviraja? Where is he?.” Abhinanda immediately got a very bad feeling about what was taking place. Abhinanda’s claim is contained in a letter to Naveen Krishna das on Dec. 18, 1999, shown below, wherein he also discusses the investigative efforts at that time. In 2017 Abhinanda das again confirmed this account, and he was not sure why Bhakticharu was frantically looking for the kaviraja, who had already departed back to Calcutta.

AN OPEN ANONYMOUS LETTER TO BHAKICHARU WITH SPECIFIC QUESTIONS

In a recent letter dated July 23, ’03, you said: “I am not denying that Srila Prabhupada spoke about poison.” Maharaja, allow me to draw your attention to the actualities:- What Srila Prabhupada said was that he had heard “All these friends” discussing his poisoning. You were in the room. Not a single person there, not even you, refuted the allegation. To the contrary, we hear you say very distinctly, “Someone gave him poison here!” And then, when Tamal Krishna Swami asked you if Prabhupada was thinking that someone had poisoned him, you said “Yes.” Now you say you are “not denying that Srila Prabhupada spoke ABOUT poison?” He said he thought that someone had poisoned him, and you clearly understood the fact, yet now you say he simply spoke ABOUT poison.

Why are you blatantly mitigating documented evidence?

In that same letter (July 23), and in the same paragraph, you admit: “As a matter of fact, when we heard His Divine Grace speaking in that way, we became extremely worried”. So why did “WE” become extremely worried if Srila Prabhupada was simply speaking ABOUT poison? It does not make sense. Who are the WE you refer to? Are they the same “friends” in the room, whom His Divine Grace heard discussing his poisoning? If you (all) were extremely worried, as you say, why didn’t you alert the authorities or law enforcement to a possible homicide in progress, or after the fact? You, and who else?

You then attempt (in the same letter) to push forward the lie that Srila Prabhupada said “Not that I am poisoned” as a statement in itself, even after he had openly stated, and you, along with the others admitted, that he thought he was being poisoned.

(1). Bhakticharu: Someone gave him poison here!

(2). Tamal: Srila Prabhupada, Shastriji says that there must be some truth to it if you say that. So who is it that has poisoned? (No answer)

(3). Tamal: Prabhupada was thinking that someone had poisoned him. Bhakticharu: Yes.

(4). Bhakticharu: He said that when Srila Prabhupada was saying that [He was being poisoned] there must be some truth behind it.

In spite of the transcription above, you are now (25 years later) attempting to circumvent documented evidence by telling us that Srila Prabhupada said he was ‘not poisoned’. This is what you wrote in your letter:

“Tamal asked Srila Prabhupada about it and Srila Prabhupada replied, ‘NO. These kind of symptoms are seen when a man is poisoned. He said like that, not that I am poisoned.’”

By neglecting to include what Tamal said, you have excluded the fact that His Divine Grace was informed that he was poisoned. Here it is:

Tamal: Srila Prabhupada? You said before that you…that it is said that you were poisoned?

So this tells us that Tamal knew and admits to an informant and his question tells us that Srila Prabhupada raised the matter of his poisoning (on tape). How would he have known unless Srila Prahupada told him (and you?). Which prompts the question- if Srila Prabhupada raised the subject, why would he do so only to say that he was not poisoned? Again, it doesn’t make any sense? So now we will look at Srila Prabhupada’s answer, which you claim “relieved us.”

Prabhupada: No. These kind of symptoms are seen when a man is poisoned. He said like that, not that I am poisoned.

The above statement tells us Srila Prabhupada was informed he had the symptoms, but his informant had not said directly that he was poisoned. Nonetheless, His Divine Grace did believe he had been poisoned. This is how we read it, and this is how YOU, Tamal Krishna, the Kaviraja, and everyone in the room understood it. The proof is there for all to hear, and is attested to through the following statements made by Tamal, Damodara Prasad Shastri and YOURSELF. Here are the statements made AFTER the so called “not that I am poisoned” statement, which you claim (in your letter) “relieved us,” but proves that you are lying because, in fact, none of you were “relieved,” ergo you should have informed the authorities and not covered up a possible homicide in progress.

Prabhupada: No these kind of symptoms are seen when a man is poisoned. He said like that, not that I am poisoned.

Tamal: Did anyone tell you that or you know it from before (know what from before…that he was not poisoned?) Prabhupada: I read something (Read what…that he was NOT POISONED?)

Tamal: Ah, I see. That’s why actually we cannot allow anyone to cook for you. (Why would Tamal want to stop “anyone” from cooking for Srila Prabhupada, is it because he said he was NOT POISONED?)

Directly after Srila Prabhupada was supposed to have admitted (according to your letter) that he was not being poisoned, here’s what the kaviraja had to say:

Kaviraja: (translated) Look, this is the thing, that maybe some rakshasa gave him poison.

(Why didn’t the kaviraja believe Srila Prabhupada when he said “Not that I am poisoned”?)

Kaviraja: (translated) If he says [he’s been poisoned] there must be some truth to it. There’s no doubt.

So if no one present at the time believed that Srila Prabhupada had said “Not that I am poisoned” as a statement in itself, how can you, Maharaja, ask us to believe you now? Just to jog your memory, we’ll throw in your “disbelief,” spoken AFTER the not that I am poisoned quote, that you say, gave you (all) relief:

Bhakticharu: He’s saying that someone gave him poison. (And you say you were ‘relieved’?)

Tamal: Prabhupada was thinking that someone had poisoned him?

Bhakticharu: Yes. Tamal: That was the mental distress?

Bhakticharu: Yes. (And you say you were relieved because he said that he was not poisoned?)

It becomes clear from your letter that you have some apprehension about what took place in 1977. You have written: “It is still a mystery to me why Srila Prabhuapda spoke that way.” We are offering you a chance to solve the mystery and exonerate yourself in the process. If it is a mystery to which you are an innocent party, why have you not strived to clear it up already? Instead, you secretly financed the book Not That I Am Poisoned to further shroud the mystery with smoke and mirrors. We have shown in our report (Judge for Yourself) how Tamal worked behind the scenes to create a diversion from the truth (his followers even named the book- Not That I am Poisoned after his suggestion), and now we have proof that you financed that book, and since there is no mention of you in the book’s credits, we must assume that you requested your participation in its publication to be kept quiet. It appears that you quite enjoy the element of mystery and deception, just as we are sworn to exposing it.

Further you have written: “I cannot even imagine in my remotest dream that any of Srila Prabhupada’s disciples could have given him poison. That is why I do not believe that there is a cover up.” Firstly, we must ask you what experience you have in dealing with poisoners? Do you believe that devils wear horns and poison turns one blue? After all this time you cannot even tell a bhogi from a yogi, and you are in the guru business. How then can you identify a poisoner? The truth is, even state-of-the-art forensics must use highly specified toxic screens to identify the poison. Ergo, a full scale investigation is necessary to identify a poisoner. Nevertheless, the only possibility of temporary escape for a poisoner once discovered, is for associates to give sanctuary by muddying the facts, as is the case here. Secondly, you say “That is why I do not believe that there is a cover up.” Maharaja, may we remind you that the matter was covered up for two decades. The “poison issue” was NEVER revealed by you or any of your confederacy. It came to light in the last five years, and only after the tapes had been spirited away from Tamal’s control in 1977 and someone discovered their contents much later. Your letters show that you are still trying to cover up the facts, in spite of our efforts to uncover them. Yoy say: “I will be happy if you can successfully conduct an investigation to settle this issue once and for all. Please let me know how you want to go about that.” We seriously doubt your sincerity in this.

Bhakticharu: He said that when Srila Prabhupada was saying that [he is poisoned] there must be something truth behind it.

So why didn’t Bhakticharu tell the kaviraja he was thinking irrationally? with absurdity? Why didn’t he tell Srila Prabhupada that? Why did Bhakticharu himself say, “Someone gave him poison here.” Not only did Bhakticharu, Tamala, Jayapataka, and Bhavananda fail to address this greviance, they also cohorted to exclude any investigation or pathological analysis to check into it.

CHANGING STORIES IS THE HALLMARK OF A MAN WITH SOMETHING TO HIDE

So, we have a remarkable series of varying statements from Bhakticharu Swami, or what amounts to “changing stories” and contradictory statements, as one would typically get from someone who is groping at straws to deny the facts, with… well, deceit and lies. This is the hallmark of a person who has something to hide and is always a signal to investigators that such a person is (1). Not telling everything, and (2). He is making up stuff. Why is he doing this? Does he know something he is afraid to tell us? Look at his suspicious series of changing stories; does it look like he is being honest?

(1). “It’s just natural when you get such shocking complaints from Srila Prabhupada, who is very dear to you and he just happened to be the person you thought you were serving lovingly, then suddenly, the food you gave him might have been poisoned!” (BCS, Europe, 2001) but then in 2000 he says in the GBC book that Srila Prabhupada said that he was NOT poisoned. Which is it?

(2). Srila Prabhupada again said that someone had poisoned him, and Bhakticharu exclaimed aloud to the others in the small room: “Someone gave him poison here!” And when Tamal asked him, “Prabhupada was thinking that someone had poisoned him?” Bhakticharu replied, “Yes.” (Nov.10, 1977)

(3). “When I first heard about this allegation (poisoning) I considered it to be so absurd that I did not think it deserved any response. I could not even imagine that anyone with a rational mind would give any credence to such an allegation.” (BCS, Not That I Am Poisoned book, 2000)

(4). He says Srila Prabhupada just had to tell any one of the devotees there about the poisoning and one can imagine what the reaction would have been like. BUT Srila Prabhupada DID tell Bhakticharu and others in 1977 that he was being poisoned, and he and Tamal did nothing!

(5). Studying chemistry in a German university where one understands how poisons work, but then his silly statement in 1998 that he thought poisoning turns the body blue? Was he really that uneducated? No, he is playing dumb. This is very suspect!

(6). He said Srila Prabhupada spoke of bad medicine being “like poison” on one occasion, and on another he said “the food you gave him might have been poisoned!” These are contradicting each other. Which is it?

(7). In 1977 he acknowledged Srila Prabhupada said he was being poisoned but in 1998 he said it should have been looked into, but he did not, and also in 1999 said the idea was absurd. Triple contradiction here!

(8). He first heard about poisoning allegations in 1997? But Srila Prabhupada told him this in 1977.

(9). He never took the matter to any authority, inside or outside ISKCON yet he has been telling Sarvabhavana das since 1977 that he suspected Srila Prabhupada was poisoned.

(10). On July 23, 2003 Bhakticharu said: “It is still a mystery to me why Srila Prabhuapda spoke that way.” And he also said: “As a matter of fact, when we heard His Divine Grace speaking in that way, we became extremely worried.” This again contradicts what he has previously stated.

Are we dizzy yet with this whirlwind of contradictory statements and positions? Bhakticharu’s words are a maze of bewildering contradictions to the point that we don’t know what he thinks from one day to the next day. Changing stories are the hallmark of a liar and a guilty man.

BHAKTICHARU FINANCES THE GBC BOOK OF LIES AND DENIAL

While Tamal surreptiously engaged his notorious Australian disciple Tirtharaj das to organize with an Australian Jayapataka Swami disciple named Gaura Deva Hari das the formation and compiling of the book titled Not That I Am Poisoned, Bhakticharu paid US$3000 for the publishing costs and covered all the expenses of Deva Gaura Hari. This was confirmed to Jitarati das by Tirtharaja das.Thus we see that Bhakticharu is an active participant in the fraudulent cover-up and blind denials of Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning. He has colluded with the other primary suspects, namely Tamal and Jayapataka, to distribute a book of lies, fraudulent claims, false propaganda… why? Because they are innocent or because they have something to hide? Any simpleton can see that something is fishy there.

Is it any wonder why Bhakticharu is considered a suspect in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning?

ANOTHER VRINDABAN POISONING ALLEGATION AGAINST BHAKTICHARU SWAMI

An account from a Srila Prabhupada disciple, former ISKCON member HH Krishna Balarama Swami of Vrindaban (born in a mahant family):

“For example, one time in the early eighties His Holiness Bhakticharu Swami and Sarvabhavana Das had surprisingly fed us alone and sumptuously, along with sweet rasagullas in their apartment in Calcutta, India. A few hours after eating, we felt like knives were moving around inside our stomach. We were in Calcutta to catch our flight to California. In that condition we reached Berkeley, California where we were admitted in the hospital. When we were in the hospital, even after many months and after many tests, the doctors could not find anything wrong in our body. Seeing our situation, the GBC Guru of the Berkeley temple at that time, HH Hansadutta Swami, sent us to the Manila temple in the Philippines where Chakravarti das and his wife (Dinasarana dd) were living. We were very sick. Chakravarti and his wife took us to Dr. Baskara and secretly told him to put us to sleep forever. Dr. Baskara, while injecting the lethal drug in us, told us to think about beautiful ocean waves and nice dancing girls on the beach, etc. Chakravarti das and his wife were both present next to our hospital bed in Dr. Baskara’s hospital in Manila and were chanting the Hare Krishna Mahamantra loudly. We cannot remember what happened next. But Hansadutta Swami was in California and he phoned HH Svarupa Damodara Swami, another GBC Guru for ISKCON, and told him that Krishna Balarama Swami was dead. Later, when HH Svarupa Damodara Swami met us in Calcutta, India, he was shocked upon seeing that we were alive. He said, “Hansadutta told me that you were dead.”

http://archived.Krishna.org/MyMission/mymission11-3.php
https://www.prabhupadanugas.eu/news/?p=43289

OCEAN OF MERCY IS ACTUALLY AN OCEAN OF SUSPICIONS

In 2016 Bhakticharu Swami (BCS) released his book called Ocean of Mercy recalling his time in 1977 as one of Srila Prabhupada’s caretakers and as assistant to Tamal, who was Srila Prabhupada’s personal secretary. Upon review, we find that it definitely portrays BCS as a very intimate caretaker of Srila Prabhupada and he shares his spiritual emotions of that time very effectively and movingly. However, it has numerous historical errors and chronological problems, that, when compared with actual tape recordings and other accounts of the time, show clearly that BCS’s version of many key 1977 incidences are either wrong or twisted. Maybe BCS simply relied upon a faded memory of things 40 years ago without fact-checking against the other existing historical accounts, and that explains the divergences. There are accounts from Hari Sauri, Tamal, Satsvarupa, the actual tape recordings, and others; but BCS’s version stands out as a very different story that conflicts with real history. Why is this?

Also we find a pattern of re-characterization of key events in two areas of history, namely the poisoning of Srila Prabhupada and Srila Prabhupada’s directions for future initiations and gurus in ISKCON. This amounts to an attempt to rewrite history, especially those parts dealing with Srila Prabhupada’s speaking of being poisoned. This is very suspicious. Why would BCS present an account dramatically conflicting with the actual tape recordings of those days, as well as with other written portrayals? Is he trying to cast events in a particular way for some reason? What reason? To us, it appears BCS has made an attempt to deflect suspicions about Srila Prabhupada’s being poisoned and the events of late 1977 that he finds difficulty explaining today. We will quote from BCS’s book in Books Two and Three to comment on what we think he has tried to do with his historical rewrite. In summary, we cannot recommend his book to anyone because it is an historical rewrite, laden with deceit, fallacy, fiction, and detraction, designed to remove the existing suspicions about Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning and Bhakticharu Swami’s possible role in it.

Rather than deal honestly with the actual documented history of events and provide rational explanations for them, BCS has changed what happened so it all looks fine to readers and disciples. But this course of dishonesty actually increases suspicions of what happened in 1977, and draws more distrust of himself upon himself. It is clear he wants to deflect attention away from himself as a prime suspect in the now proven cadmium poisoning of Srila Prabhupada. He also tries to resolve the question of succession to Srila Prabhupada by claiming something that is unsubstantiated by any other real evidence. Altogether, the book is an ocean of questions and suspicions. He is trying to hide history with his doctored so-called recollections. His book is thus fraud and cheating by his deceitful changing of what really happened, as shown below.

CHANGES TO HISTORICAL EVENTS REGARDING THE GURU ISSUE

From BCS’s book Ocean of Mercy, we extract the following questionable sections and comment.

(1). “[Srila Prabhupada said] ‘Now that you have become a sannyasi, you are a guru. You can initiate. But as long as the spiritual master is present on the planet, one does not give initiation. That is the formality.’” (p 184)

COMMENTS: We do not believe that Srila Prabhupada said this, or anything close to it. We do not find anywhere else in Srila Prabhupada’s teachings that upon taking sannyas that one is allowed to initiate when his guru “disappears.” We think this is inserted by BCS simply to try to give further credence to his being an initiating guru, to bolster his so-called authority received from the ISKCON GBC. Amazing.

(2). “It was clear, however, that Prabhupada would not be able to stay with us forever, and there was some speculation about whom he would appoint as his successor acharya. Some thought it would be Kirtanananda Swami, others thought it would be Satsvarupa Maharaja, and others thought it would be Tamal Krishna Maharaja. When Srila Prabhupada was approached with the question, his initial treaction was, “my Guru Maharaja did not appoint any successor acharya, so how can I?”

COMMENTS: Finally someone admits how the leaders were thinking, that one of them would be named as the successor acharya. Again, amazing. And Srila Prabhupada clearly disappointed the aspiring “acharyas.” Instead, eleven ritviks or priests were named instead, and although Srila Prabhupada did not say this anywhere, the leaders then claimed after Srila Prabhupada had left that the ritviks were meant to become full gurus. But where is that evidence?

(3). “Soon thereafter he named ten leading devotees to give initiation on his behalf in different parts of the world while he was still present on this planet, and he said that they could initiate their own disciples after his departure. Hamsaduta’s name was not on that list, but when Srila Prabhupada heard about his successful preaching in Sri Lanka, he asked Tamal Krsna Maharaja to add him….” (pg. 200)

COMMENTS: Actually Srila Prabhupada named NINE ritvik representatives on July 7, not ten. Tamal said that on July 9, when he was ready to type up the July 9th letter, he asked Srila Prabhupada if there were any more names to add, and Srila Prabhupada then added Bhavananda and Hansadutta. Also, the GBC already apologized to the ISKCON society in 1990 about the false claims made by the GBC in 1978 that Srila Prabhupada had appointed eleven successor gurus. So Bhakticharu’s claim is contradictory to the present GBC body’s official position that there never was any appointment of gurus. Therefore, Bhakticharu’s statement: “that they could initiate their own disciples after his departure” is totally contradictory to the ISKCON GBC minutes and resolutions which state the opposite, that Srila Prabhupada only named ritviks for while he was still present. The GBC now claim no arrangement was made for after his departure, thus necessitating their making a solution by creating a vote-approved system for new initiating gurus. This erroneous claim by Bhakticharu shows either tremendous deceit or total confusion of history, or both.

(4). On p. 206, BCS describes that in late August 1977: “When it was finally time for him to go, we all watched him stride through the gate and disappear around the corner.”

COMMENTS: But Srila Prabhupada could not walk at that time. Another account describes: “…the caravan reached the Delhi airport, where Srila Prabhupada remained lying on the bed in his car with the doors open. Srila Prabhupada was finally moved by wheelchair to the plane.” (ISKCON in the 1970’s, Satsvarupa, p.308) So why the inaccuracy in BCS’s account? Stride through the gate? This gives us more doubts about his book.

(5). Conspicuously, BCS has mentioned absolutely nothing about the instructions that Srila Prabhupada gave on May 28 nor does he mention the July 9 Order. He was present for both of these very important events, so why has he chosen to simply ignore them? This omission is convenient for his concocted explanations on guru succession and future initiations.

CHANGES TO HISTORICAL EVENTS REGARDING THE POISON ISSUE

From BCS’s book Ocean of Mercy, we extract the following questionable sections and comment.

(1). “Abhiram Prabhu found an ayurvedic doctor in Delhi who prepared makharadhvaja. So he purchased it and brought it to Vrindaban.” (p. 221)

COMMENT: More serious historical errors here, which leave us wondering further about the veracity of BCS’s other claims in his book. Abhiram das left Vrindaban and Srila Prabhupada’s service at least a week earlier on October 16; it was actually Satadhanya das who brought the medicine from Delhi to Vrindaban, and it was purchased by Chandra Swami and then donated to Srila Prabhupada. BCS has the facts all mixed up. Abhiram had nothing to do with the makharadhvaja at all. What else in his book is wrong?

(2). “That evening, a Bengali devotee from another matha in Vrndavana came to ask Srila Prabhupada for a donation for a temple […]

COMMENT: Here is another big error. Srila Prabhupada discontinued the makhardhvaja on October 27 after three doses because it had caused diarrhea. Balaram Misra, who maintained the Chaitanya Mahaprabhu temple, for which he asked for a donations for renovations, came to see Srila Prabhupada on November 9. There are 13 days separation between these two events, yet BCS says “Prabhupada started to feel so bad that he decided not to take any more. That evening, a Bengali devotee…” and thus implies these two events were on the same day, although 13 days apart. Why does he do this? The answer is that he wants to explain Srila Prabhupada’s talk of being poisoned on Nov. 9 with some moderate but temporary ill effects of medicine last taken on Oct. 27. The Bengali Balaram Misra did NOT come that sameday, but 13 days later!.

(3). “Speaking in Bengali, Srila Prabhupada then said that he had been feeling terrible- as if he had been given poison.

COMMENT: This is afraudulent misrepresentation of facts. The reason why BCS has put these two events together on the same day is because he wants us to believe that when Srila Prabhupada announced to Balaram Misra that he thought he was being poisoned, he was talking about the ill effects of the makharadhvaja. Many ISKCON leaders have tried to explain away Srila Prabhupada’s statements about being poisoned with this makharadhvaja theory. (see Ch. 18) BCS has joined the others in a deceitful explanation which is easily exposed and is their attempt to assign Srila Prabhupada’s statements to bad medicine rather than actual poisoning. But on November 10 when Srila Prabhupada last spoke of being poisoned, BCS and the other caretakers all engaged in a frenzied discussion which clearly acknowledged actual homicidal, malicious poisoning. (see Ch. 19) Even 13 days earlier when Srila Prabhupada had taken the last of the “bad” medicine (makharadhvaja), he never spoke, as BCS asserts, “as if he had been given poison.” This is concocted by BCS to make us believe there was no poisoning. However, the hair tests with cadmium prove otherwise.

(4). “Although many devotees were standing around, I was the only one who could understand the conversation. I was shocked to hear what Prabhupada had said, and told Tamal Krsna Maharaja, who shared my reaction […] After the Bengali devotee left, the devotees got together and I told them in detail what Prabhupada had said. Tamal Krsna Maharaja, followed by several senior devotees, went right to him and asked, ‘Srila Prabhupada, do you feel that you have been given poison?’ ‘No’, Srila Prabhupada replied, ‘not that I have been poisoned. I am just speaking like that.’ He had simply been trying to express how bad he had been feeling.” (pg. 222)

COMMENT: Where to start? How does Bhakticharu think he can get away with this surgery of actual events? He is digging a grave for himself the more he speaks on this issue. Silence would have been far better for his defence. These conversations were tape recorded, and this is just not the way they went, not even close. See Ch. 12 for the transcript of these talks. Bhakticharu Swami has now conspicuously projected more suspicion upon himself by proposing a history that could not have happened, according to the tapes and other accounts. BCS is in clear discord with actual history by trying to make up his own history. The tapes do not lie, and BCS has it all wrong. “As if” he was given poison? “I am just speaking like that”? These statements are nowhere in the actual conversations. Read them and see. Bhakticharu is trying to convince us that Srila Prabhupada was not speaking of actual poisoning, just that he felt as if poisoned. By these statements, he is creating more and more reason to suspect him as involved in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning.

The hair tests prove there was a real poisoning, not just some “feeling” about bad medicine. This is why BCS is a prime suspect in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning, due to repeated dishonesties. The guilty always do this in their attempt to hide what was really done.

Srila Prabhupada told Balaram Misra on Nov. 9, and Tamal asked Srila Prabhupada on the next day, Nov. 10, “So who is it that has poisoned?”… NOT… ”Do you feel that you have been given poison.” And the day before, on Nov. 9, Tamal asked Srila Prabhupada: “You said before that you… that it is said that you were poisoned?” And Srila Prabhupada replied, “No. These kind of symptoms are seen when a man is poisoned. He said like that, not that I am poisoned.” The “he” is the one who said there were poisoning symptoms, but “he” did not say there was poisoning. Srila Prabhupada himself said he thought he was being poisoned. In this way BCS and other ISKCON misleaders jumble the conversations to make their own versions, trying to fool people with the way things did not happen. What an outrage! Does BCS think we do not have the taped conversations as they are and that he can just rewrite them as he likes and no one will notice?

(5). “I told Damodar Prasad about what Srila Prabhupada had said about feeling like he had been poisoned, but he brushed that aside. ‘When someone feels pain or discomfort,’ he said, ‘he may say something like, “I have been poisoned.” Don’t worry about that. Srila Prabhupada is a pure devotee of Krsna…..These are all his pastimes.’ […] Damodar Prasad thought for a minute and then said, ‘Makaradhvaja is like nectar, but it is very strong. It is a tonic. Therefore, the body must be able to absorb it. To give the medicine without even seeing the patient’s condition was not right. Whoever gave it like that made a mistake. Besides that, it Is prepared from mercury, so if the mercury is not cured properly its effect can be quite harmful.’ I began to see what a big mistake had been made. ‘What can be done now?’ I asked. Although Damodar Prasad tried to console me, a terrible weight remained in my heart. I told Tamal Krsna Maharaja about the conversation […] but Tamal Krsna Maharaja reminded me that it was Srila Prabhupada, after his dream, who had wanted to take it.” (pg. 225-6)

COMMENT: Actually Damodar Sastri believed that Srila Prabhupada WAS poisoned, according to his own son, Dr. Ramesh K Sharma. See Ch. 82. Further, nowhere in the tape recordings do we see that Satriji believed anything other than that Srila Prabhupada’s speaking of poisoning must be true, that it was due to a rakshasa, and questioning why anyone would want to do this, etc. Review the tape transcriptions. (Ch. 12) And we have already addressed the bogus suggestion that Srila Prabhupada was talking of poison as reference to ill effects of medicines like the makharadhvaja. (See Ch. 18) Makharadhvaja was only taken thrice Oct. 26-27, then discontinued. So how does “Someone has poisoned me” on Nov. 10 have anything to do with something that had not been spoken of for 2 weeks? Bhakticharu is trying to mislead us that the reason he did nothing when Srila Prabhupada spoke of being poisoned is that he was only “feeling as if poisoned,” brushing aside Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning complaint as due to discomfort. Now we are convinced Bhakticharu is purposefully obscuring what really happened, and the only reason someone does that is because they actually ARE guilty of what they are being suspected of. BCS also contradicts his earlier versions of the events as listed above.

BCS BOOK OCEAN OF MERCY RE: HEALTH EXCERPTS

In reviewing Bhakticharu Swami’s book Ocean of Mercy, what was striking was the lack of any specific descriptions about Srila Prabhupada’s severe decline of health in 1977. Bhakticharu was with Srila Prabhupada’s party as early as January 10 at the Kumbha Mela, and then again in Mayapur from mid-February and on. He says nothing about the sudden and drastic health attack of February 26 which was well-known amongst all the devotees there at that time- prayers for srila Prabhupada’s health were advised by management and Srila Prabhupada lay bedridden for days, koaning in pain, and unable to give the morning class as usual. Why does Bhakticharu miss this major event in his book? Further, he hardly mentions Srila Prabhupada’s health while Srila Prabhupada could not eat or go on walks. On p.105 is the first mention of health, and he describes: “Srila Prabhupada’s health had been bad for months, since he had returned to India, and now it was deteriorating rapidly.”

However, the facts are that Srila Prabhupada was still able to take his daily walks, give classes, meet visitors, etc until February 26 when there was a horrible and immediate episode just days after Tamal had arrived from America. Bhakticharu makes it sound like it all started much earlier, and was a gradual decline of health. Everyone in Mayapur, including all the visiting foreign devotees who came for the annual Mayapur festival, was fully awate of Srila Prabhupada’s sudden health problems. How does Bhakticharu miss this?

The liited health descriptions:

(1). Pg. 116: “…despite his ill health…” (late March 1977)

(2). Pg. 119: “His health was not good and he was physically weak…” (Cross Maidan)

(3). Pg. 134: “Due to his poor health…” (April)

(4). Pg. 160: “Prabhupada told him [Tamal] the same thing. ‘Please take me to Vrindaban. The time has come for me to leave my body. I weant to leave my body in Vrindaban.’ Srila Prabhupada’s health had been poor, but none of us had imagined that his illness was so serious that he could leave his bnody. We all thought it was a temporary setback and that he would soon get better… We were all stunned by this turn of events.”

On May 8, Srila Prabhupada arrived in Hrishikesh and he ate kicharis and jalebis heartily, with daily public darshans, increasing his translation work, and even teaching the cooking of many preparations. On May 11, Tamal wrote to Radhaballabha that Srila Prabhupada’s health is slightly improving. Srila Prabhupada wrote Giriraj that “Yes, my health is improving a very little.” But late on May 15, after midnight, there was a sudden turn for the worse, as described by Satsavrupa: “…and with the storm came a drastic turn in Srila Prabhupada’s health. He said the end was near, and he asked to go immediately to Vrindaban.”

Arriving in Vrindaban on May 17, Srila Prabhupada could no longer walk and began preparations for his departure including the drafting a final will. Yet the only descriptions we get from Bhakticharu up to this point is the three ultra-brief mentions above of poor health, with no detail. If his book is supposed to be about Srila Prabhupada’s last year, why has he avoided anything about Srila Prabhupada’s health condition? He makes it sound like a vague gradual deterioration that no one understood or saw unfolding.

Actually, there were two very dramatic attacks on Srila Prabhupada’s health, February 26 and May 16, and Bhakticharu fails to describe anything about them in his book. It is as though he wants us to believe that Srila Prabhupada quietly faded away due to some unknown cause. Of course, today we know it was due to lethal cadmium poisoning, the levels of which produced very obvious and outstanding health symptoms, of which his omission is a very suspicious. He doesn’t want to talk about Srila Prabhupada’s health failure and deteriorating symptoms except in the vaguest way possible?

Then he claims Srila Prabhupada told him to stop cooking for him: “he was going to stop eating and drinking in order to give up his body…” to which Tamal replied: “What can we do when Srila Prabhupada makes such a decision and gives us such an order?” Rather, what else could Srila Prabhupada do, being poisoned? Bhakticharu then says: “And nobody could have imagined that his condition would deteriorate so quickly.” (pg. 211) No one, that is, except the poisoners who were somehow giving the cadmium to Srila Prabhupada.

And that pretty much is all the detail that Bhakticharu has in his book about Srila Prabhupada’s health conditions and health decline during all of 1977. Nothing about diagnoses, diabetes, kidneys, causes of illness, very little about all the doctors that came and went, or about medicines other than the makharadhvaja.

Bhakticharu Swami has evaded the health issue almost entirely. As the living caretaker who was giving Srila Prabhupada all the medicines and applying all the treatments prescribed by dozens of doctors and kavirajas throughout 1977, why has he not mentioned but 2% of this history? It was his specific service at the time, in conjunction with Tamal. This information is very conspicuous by its ABSENCE, and it simply casts another cloud of suspicion upon him. Altogether, there a lot of clouds of suspicion about Bhakticharu Swami and his knowledge of or involvement in Srila Prabhupada’s catstrophic cadmium poisoning.

Bhakticharu is also one who would have knowledge of poisoning with cadmium and its doses because he was a chemistry major in a German university. We would not mention this otherwise, but since he is so suspiciously implicated by his various conflicting “stories,” we do so. For example, on July 12, 1977 in our Health Chronicles in Someone Has Poisoned Me, it is described that Bhakticharu was taught by Bonamali kaviraja to prepare a herbal potion daily which included two salts, one being sodium nitrate. The entire story was told by Bhakticharu to Nityananda das in November 1998. It was clear that he was quite knowledgeable with chemicals, compounds, and their uses.

http://killgurubecomeguru.org/books/
—
– Nityananda das –
srigovinda@gmail.com

Filed Under: prabhupadanugas · Tagged With: arsenic, balavanta, Bhakti Caru Swami, Bhavananda, bif, Charu, investigation, killed, killing, mercury, naveen, nityananda, poison, poisoning, prabhupada, Srila Prabhupada’s Poisoning, tamal

Comments

Sudarsana Das Vanacari says:

19. October 2017 at 5:06 am

His “last” garland should be made of hemp as he stands quivering on a ”raised platform” (befitting his position!). His “soon to be, ‘cold feet’ anticipating the inevitable disengagement of the trap door he stands upon! Will he be crying more “crocodile tears” for Srila Prabhupada, as he awaits the hangman’s final duty?

What kind of hell awaits such a demon? Is there any crime worse than this? Yes! the noose is getting tighter and tighter? His internal fear, terror and paranoia must be increasing by the day!

Yhs
Sudarsana

Reply
Hasti says:

19. October 2017 at 11:20 am

Not enough. Indictment is what we are looking for. All this is just the front cover of a book long delayed.

INDICT HIM FOR GOD’S SAKE!!

Ys Hasti

————
PS: You also can try a lie detector test. (L. Kary-Rana)
————

INDICTMENT

A written accusation charging that an individual named therein has committed an act or omitted to do something that is punishable by law.

An indictment is found and presented by a Grand Jury legally convened and sworn. It originates with a prosecutor and is issued by the grand jury against an individual who is charged with a crime. Before such individual may be convicted, the charge must be proved at trial Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.

The purpose of an indictment is to inform an accused individual of the charge against him or her so that the person will be able to prepare a defense.

————-

Bill Of Indictment against Tamal Krishna Goswami

http://gurupoison.tripod.com/

Reply
abhaya carana seva das says:

19. October 2017 at 2:14 pm

pamho aagtacbsp,
dipa wali ki jai,

its true this ordinary man got many things to hide to us but he cant hide that to the supreme personality of godhead sri krsna bhagavat,he got very strong subtly enemies as krodha kama lobha etc…

but blind and stupid small donkey still support this nasty poisoner of our pukka guru hdg acbsp,our main problem at the moment is to establish a pukka ksatriya and brahmana varna because if these two varna were complete they could not have even the chance to kill our beloved gurudeva hdg acbsp,

bcs kbs etc.. are still alive because the sanatana dharma is not perfect yet but it will be soon after armaghedon they profhecy for next year are very bad unless sri caitanya mahaprabhu change it there is not hope to survive to all the bad profhecies stored for next year we just keep chanting hare krsna maha mantra then rakhe krsna mara ke mara krsna rakhe ke we depend always on krsna for life or for death

agtsp
ys haribol

Reply
- Tamohara dasa says:
  
  21. April 2018 at 11:52 pm
  
  jaya!
  http://killgurubecomeguru.org/books/
  —
  – Nityananda das –
  srigovinda@gmail.com
  Related posts:
  
  NEW VIDEO: POISONING OBJECTIONS ANSWERED
  POISONING SRILA PRABHUPADA’S BODY – The institutional cover-up by senior leaders in ISKCON
  JAYAPATAKA ENDORSES SRILA PRABHUPADA’S POISONING
  Hansadutta and the poisoning of Srila Prabhupada
  NEW FILM: CRIME OF THE MILLENIUM – SRILA PRABHUPADA’S POISONING
  TAMAL’S MERCY KILLING – Poisoning Srila Prabhupada’s Body
  Srila Prabhupada’s Poisoning: – ANYBODY CAN THROW TOGETHER SOME DOUBTS
  Srila Prabhupada poisoning issue and evidence
  
  Spiritnet members are requested to post these videos wherever possible hare krsna
  
  Reply
abhaya carana seva das says:

20. October 2017 at 12:32 pm

pamho
agtacbsp,

bcs did the demon course in the ancient land of the daitya sthan germany it used to be the land of demons many ages kalpa ago, to study chemical and demoniac transformation through chemicals drugs but he failed to do so because he used all his demoniac knowledge to kill the best uttama adhikari devotee as hdg acbsp,

agtacbsp
ys haribol

Reply
- Pariksit das says:
  
  20. October 2017 at 2:21 pm
  
  Germany is known as “Deutschland” (the Land of the Deutsch)
  
  Deutschland comes from the Sanskrit “Daityasthan” (the land of the demons)
  
  Daityas are demons. “The demons are technically known as Daityas because they proceeded from the womb of Diti.” (SB 6.18.10)
  
  So Germany or Deutschland is the land of the demons.
  
  Bhakti Charu was born in Bengal in 1945 and spent most of his early life in the city of Calcutta. In 1970, he left India to study chemistry in Germany, where he later on meets the German devotees who preached to him to become a devotee of Krishna.
  
  In 1976 he returned to India to Mayapur, to join ISKCON and become officially initiated by Srila Prabhupada who gave him Sannyasa in 1977.
  
  Reply
  - Sudarsana Das Vanacari says:
    
    21. October 2017 at 7:16 am
    
    The Bavarian Illuminati (founded by Adam Weishaupt) is depicted on the United Nations symbol as the acacia leaves (13 leaves) which surround the Earth globe symbol. The acacia leaves on the other side represent the York Illuminati (also 13 degrees). The acacia also means Apollo which means the Devil.
    The Queen of “England” is the female head of the 33 Degree Scottish Rite Illuminati (depicted as the Earth globe on the same (blue) UN symbol, (which has 33 sections) symbolizes the worldwide demonic power and control of the Illuminati. The Queens real name is Saxe Coburg Gotha (not Windsor) and it was the Coburg Gotha family that funded the Bavarian Illuminati, which was “founded” in 1776 (the same date as The American “Independence” Day)…coincidence? I think not!
    
    The Queen is descended from Clovis (the King before Charlemagne) and Clovis is said to be of the Merovingian bloodline. George Bush is also of the Merovingian bloodline and his mother is the daughter of Aleister Crowley (the founder of the Satanic Golden Dawn). The USA has always been controlled by the British and European Illuminati as every US president is related by blood (except Van Buren) even Obama. The first thing that Bush did when he was ”elected” was go to Britain and bow down before the Queen to pay homage. When Gough Whitlam (former Australian PM) got a little over ambitious and wanted to get rid of US tracking stations such as Pine Gap, the Queens representative (John Kerr) simply SACKED HIM!
    
    The whole banking system of the World is controlled by the Rothschilds who are Ashknazi German Jews (like Tamal), with only a few exceptions, Iran, Syria, North Korea, and Libya (that is the only reason that these countries are being targeted by The UN). The US Federal Reserve owners Rockerfeller, Warburg and JP Morgan are all agents of Rothschilds. The Queen sits on her throne and underneath is the ‘Stone of Scune’ (Scone), but this ancient stone is only a copy. The real one lies in the Rothschilds vaults as it is they who are in control, not only of the Queen but also the USA, The World Bank, The Bank of England, The United Nations (who are just a bunch of Satanic parasites and murderers) and the World.
    
    The Round Table (which includes the UN) is the administrative arm of the Illuminati and Europe (and London, Switzerland etc) are the Banking Arm of The Illuminati. The USA is the military Arm of The Illuminati and has ALWAYS BEEN CONTROLLED BY EUROPE. As the saying goes “Europe loads the weapons and America fires the guns!” Everything you hear on TV is ALL CONTROLLED BY THE ILLUMINATI AS IS ALL!, I REPEAT, ALL!, I REPEAT AGAIN, ALL TOTAL BULLSHIT!!!!!!
    
    The whole world is controlled by Demons, and it has been this way for centuries if not thousands of years. Genuine Vaisnavas understand this as they will never submit to Demonic forces, but will fight them from cradle to grave. This is why they murdered Srila Prabhupada as these Demons are agents of those same dark forces that control the masses of stupid, brainwashed slaves that inhabit this World. ISKCON (the Inane Sacrilege for Kike CONcoction), are the playthings of these Demons as they cavort and embrace bankers, corporations, bogus politicians, mundane religions (also under the control of the Illuminati), The UN, corrupt government ”officials and dignitaries”, phony ”awards” presentations and patronizing self promotion. They also deny Srila Prabhupada’s instructions by preaching bogus ”pseudo-science” such as the Rothschild inspired “CO2 Global “Warming” myth”, congratulate Zionist bogus ”religions” such as Bah’hai Faith, ”Interfaith” (a bogus UN manifestation of centralized control) and various other mundane ”charitable” foundations and ”causes”.
    
    The FISKCON ”leaders” are simply an extension of the cancerous, demonic parasites that control the World and have the same disproportionate, Satanic, Zionist, Ashkenazi Jew-controlling, centralized power configuration as The Round Table. They are simply pathological lying parasites and leeches with only one goal, and that is to exploit, corrupt, enslave and suck the blood of as many unfortunate, hapless fools as possible, who will willingly follow them to hell!
    
    Daso Smi
    Sudarsana
    
    Reply
    - Mohini says:
      
      10. July 2020 at 5:42 pm
      
      https://www.zdf.de/dokumentation/zdfinfo-doku/fahrenheit-11-9-von-michael-moore–100.html
      
      The whole film for free ,maybe a few more days available,most of it is in english .
      
      You are right again Sudarshana Prabhu!
      
      Reply
Urdhvaga das says:

20. October 2017 at 3:04 pm

Bhakti Caru was supposedly crying big crocodile tears outside Srila Prabhupada’s room, saying he was greatly upset that Srila Prabhupada complained of being poisoned. Evidently, everyone in the room agreed that Srila Prabhupada was complaining of being poisoned, including the Kaviraj.

It is very strange and suspicious that later on Bhakti Charu, completely contradicts himself, saying the exact opposite, namely that Srila Prabhupada was not poisoned. What a demon.

Bhakti Charu: I was under the impression that when someone is given poison then his body becomes blue.

WOW – unbelievable, that is really an idiotic answer and denial of the poisoning from someone who studied chemistry.

It is very clear and evident that Bhakti Charu is trying very hard to cover-up Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning by protecting the poisoners (Tamal, Bhavananda, Jayapatka, etc) so he can be the ‘big’ guru in Isk’Con.

Bhakti Charu’s history says ist all:
http://www.harekrsna.org/Bhakti-Charu-hist.htm

Reply
Amar Puri says:

21. October 2017 at 12:14 am

In 2002 Sarvabhavana das was privately recorded by Sakshi Gopal das stating the following:

“He’s been telling me for the last 24 years that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned. He even told me he suspected Srila Prabhupada was being poisoned before he left this world. Now he is denying. What is my gain or loss to say this? Bhakticharu Maharaja may remember that I introduced him to Krishna Consciousness and to the lotus feet of Srila Prabhupada. Why is he saying lies? Why is he denying like this?”

This is the first person claiming that Bhakticharu Swami knew about Srila Prabhupada being poisoned. Whether Sarvabhavana das will confirm this again is dubious, as he has much at stake with definite repercussions from ISKCON leadership if he were to publicly make such a statement. But this is what he reluctantly told a former member of the private investigation committee in India around 2003. ”

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

Dear Learned Readers,

Does the above mentioned message on tap recorded from the devotee Sarvabhavana das in 2002 by Sakshi Gopal das , who is a friend of Bhakti Caru Swami, still available ?

Does Sakshi Gopal das has the recorded message of Sarvabhavana das in 2002 ?

Does any type of proof of the devotee Sarvabhavana das gave to the private investigation committee in India around 2003 still available ?

Well, I do sincerely hope that some member concerned in the Truth Committee can find some witnesses from the sources cited above who may come forward and help to bring these all types of present Iskcon’s gurus involved in the poison issue of Srila Prabhupada in the court of law in this material world.

Hare Krishna. All Glories to Srila Prabhupada.

OM TAT SAT.

N.B. : HOPE SAKSHI GOPAL AND / OR SOME BODY FROM THE PRIVATE INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE 2003 MAY SHED SOME MORE LIGHT ON THE TOPICS QUESTIONED ABOVE IN THIS WRITING.

THANKS.

HARE KRISHNA.

Reply
Mahesh Raja says:

21. October 2017 at 3:01 am

Urdhvaga das: Bhakti Caru was supposedly crying big crocodile tears outside Srila Prabhupada’s room, saying he was greatly upset that Srila Prabhupada complained of being poisoned.

Mahesh: In Krsna book, we find that Kamsa was also having tears – BUT the demon was a BIG killer. So let us not be fooled. Tears from Bhakti Caru can mean PLAY ACT to convince OTHERS who are GULLIBLE.

SB 1.7.42 The Son of Drona Punished
The specific words used in this sloka are vama-svabhava, “mild and gentle by nature.” A good man or woman accepts anything very easily, but a man of average intelligence does not do so. BUT, ANYWAY, WE SHOULD NOT GIVE UP OUR REASON AND DISCRIMINATORY POWER JUST TO BE GENTLE. ONE MUST HAVE GOOD DISCRIMINATORY POWER TO JUDGE A THING ON ITS MERIT. We should not follow the mild nature of a woman and thereby accept that which is not genuine. Asvatthama may be respected by a good-natured woman, but that does not mean that he is as good as a genuine brahmana.

Urdhvaga das: It is very clear and evident that Bhakti Charu is trying very hard to cover-up Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning by protecting the poisoners (Tamal, Bhavananda, Jayapatka, etc) so he can be the ‘big’ guru in Isk’Con.

Mahesh: My understanding is—– Bhakti Caru is JUST AS MUCH INVOLVED WITH THEM in giving poison to Srila Prabhupada.

The PRIME suspects according to my understanding are:

1) Tamal Krsna(TKG)

2) Jayapataka

3) Bhavananda

4) Bhakti Caru

5) Jayadvaita

6) Hamsadutta? —- this one is a VERY interesting case —– maybe???????

We DO give credit for his good devotional service in Original Srila Prabhupada’s books—- BUT—— consider—– THIS——- HOW?????? —– can—– someone be in the SAME ROOM SOOOOOO CLOSE—— and—— not have heard these whispers, giggling,gloating going on? Also—– he is DENYING poisoning took place. He is actually DENYING the TAPES evidence . THIS IS: LIVING IN DENIAL.
And—–he is ALSO trying to put Ritvik System (July 9th 1977) as a TEMPORARY measure. THIS means that there IS VESTED INTEREST for exploiting. These people wanted POWER grab. The THIEVES wanted to STEAL Srila Prabhupada’s disciples for THEMSELVES. They wanted WORSHIP, ADORATION, FREE SLAVES(disciples)PROPERTIES,MONEY. That was the MOTIVE. There HAS to be a MOTIVE for getting rid of Srila Prabhupada. And—- what we DO KNOW is there—– WAS——- VESTED INTEREST involved.

Srila Prabhupada poisoned:
The following sites has whispers of the poison givers:
To hear the whole CD of the Nov 10 1977 Conversations from beginning to end, please click
http://www.mediafire.com/?ppvh77orok1r7vh

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Srila Prabhupada Given Poison:

http://www.prabhupadanugas.eu/news/?p=42549#comment-29598

http://www.prabhupadanugas.eu/news/?p=43821

http://www.prabhupadanugas.eu/news/?p=42564#more-42564

http://www.prabhupadanugas.eu/news/?p=46843#more-46843

http://www.iskcon-truth.com/poison/poison-whispers.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIBqNBMbPvY&t=316s

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hamsadutta on his version of Ritvik:

http://www.iskconirm.com/docs/webpages/Ham100208.htm

Reply
Amar Puri says:

21. October 2017 at 5:24 pm

Mahesh Raja says:

6) Hamsadutta? —- this one is a VERY interesting case —– maybe???????

We DO give credit for his good devotional service in Original Srila Prabhupada’s books—-

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

Yes, VERY interesting case, indeed. Think about it for a while. A person Hamsadutta was a TRUSTEE of the BBT for LIFE legally to protect and promote Srila Prabhupada’s Books and His Legacy.

How come he was thrown out of the BBT TRUSTEE position ?

What it tells the READERS is that he is one of the crooked person himself with full of Prathistha.

What kind of a credit does he deserve ?

Whatever type of a service he rendered in the mission of Srila Prabhupada, all of his merits were awarded by the arrangement of Ma Durga according to his personal motivation of the position being a guru, having a prestige and so on. As soon as his merits got exhausted he went back to his natural position where he is, what he is and how he lives his life further determines his fate. That is all.

Is he going to accept the TRUTH as it is ?

Not in this life time as it appears.

Hare Krishna. All Glories to Srila Prabhupada.

Reply
Acsd says:

22. April 2018 at 9:12 am

Pamho
agtacbsp.
Janu saptami ki jay.

im surprise to see all these shameless donkey still to hold srila prabhupada transcendental position with authority.they must step down from their cheating position because they born without blessing in pulinda candala yavana mleccha etc..families.they must be torture very badly for killing srila prabhupada and if is not here it will be in the hellish planets which is weating for all these demons to be punish.

their nasty mental concoction is not a excuse they have to pay all the bad karma that they are still making by keeping to betray srila prabhupada mayavadi maha aparadhi they are the greatest offenders
agtsp
ys haribol

Reply
Mahesh says:

18. June 2020 at 2:17 pm

Bhakticaru(MOST likely who said this): Visha pya bichari Visha= poison…. pya=drank….bichari= poor fellow

http://www.iskcon-truth.com/poison/mp3-poison-files/soundbyte.mp3

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Yamadutas coming:

http://krishna1008.blogspot.com/2020/06/please-pray-for-bhakti-charu-swami-in.html

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://www.prabhupadanugas.eu/news/?p=43821

Sakshi says:
30. August 2015 at 12:24 am

Aksayapyabhicari
Should read:- Visha pya bichari
Visha= poison…. pya=drank….bichari= poor fellow.

Download MP3
Put poison in the milk

have a good ear phones
Used Splayer. Download free from internet
when you go to 00.05 PRESS with mouse cursor on the GREEN line FEW times until it comes to 00.06 This so YOU can HEAR the NAME it will give the NAME “Aksayapychari” CLEARLY it will continue “Aksayapybhicari poison is put on milk” Sentence ends at 00.09
Press on 00.40 Green line FEW times until you come to 00.47
“Tamal saying Put Poison in milk” then reply Uuh! (seems like Bhavananda deep voice Uuh!)
Tamal gloating says “Poison is going down” 00.48 then giggles from someone up to 00.59

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Indian man (2): But what if they die in coma? What if they die in deep unconsciousness?
Prabhupāda: That is not very good. Coma is not good. That is the sign of sinful life. He must be conscious. That is good.

Link to this page: https://prabhupadabooks.com/classes/bg/7/4/nairobi/october/31/1975

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Sometimes, when a person is dying, he falls into a coma and lies unconscious. We do not know what kind of fearful test this person is undergoing. He may be dreaming so many things, or he may be crying. He cannot express what is going on. Those who are very sinful especially die in that way.

Link to this page: https://prabhupadabooks.com/tlk/17/tlk_vs_41

Reply
Mahesh Raja says:

4. July 2020 at 2:26 pm

Note: latest new INSIDE information just in: Bhakti Caru is not going to make it – he still in COMA – and – on his last hours:

Prabhupāda: This example is given. Suppose we are walking. This step, when I assure that “This is all right, it is not, it will not go down,” then I take up this. Then again this. This example is given. Similarly, change of body like that. As soon as it is settled up what kind of body he is going to accept or which is being offered to him, daiva-netreṇa, by higher authority, then this man leaves this body and again enters in the womb of the body which he is destined to get. This is the process of death.
Yadubara: Is that immediate, Śrīla Prabhupāda?
Prabhupāda: Immediate. Just like immediate I am walking. When it is fixed up, then I take up. Then when it is fixed up, then I take up, like this. Immediately.
Yaśomatīnandana: What about hell? How does the jīva soul go to hell?
Prabhupāda: Yes. They go. Those who are going to hell, that is fixed up very quickly. It doesn’t take much time. Hell means he is getting the next body, hellish body. That’s all. Suppose he is going to get the hellish body to become the worm of stool, so in that way he enters the worm, mother worm, to get the body and enjoy the hell. That’s all.
Satsvarūpa: Don’t they sometimes have to go to Yamarāja first for practice?
Prabhupāda: Yes. That is daiva-netreṇa. These things are finished very quickly. And if it takes little time, then this man who is dying, he remains in coma and does not die. Because the judgement is going on, the decision waiting, coma. You have seen sometimes a man is in coma for seven days, eight days? Yes. That means his judgement is going on, that… Such kind of death means very sinful death. Not yet settled up, very complicated case. Therefore it takes time.
Yadubara: What about persons who die in their sleep? Is that a sinful death?
Prabhupāda: Yes. Dream or awakened, everything is dream, gross dream and subtle dream. That’s all. This is also dream. What do you mean by dream? Dream means existent for a little period. That’s all. So night dream is for two hours and this dream is for twenty-four hours.
Yaśomatīnandana: So in other words when it says that one goes to hell, any lower species is also like hell. If one is going to assume a dog’s body, then does he go to hell before he assumes a dog’s body?
Prabhupāda: There is statement like that, that one is put into the hellish condition for practicing little, and then he is put into the womb of such mother.
Yaśomatīnandana: Is that a long duration of practice or just…, very short?
Prabhupāda: No, very short. Short mean their short. It may take little more time.
Girirāja: Now they have machines that when the person is in coma, the machines artificially keep the heart beating and the other processes…
Prabhupāda: Then heart beating will go on, either you apply machine or no machine. Heart beating. But when the heart stops, no machine can revive it. So what is the use of machine? But by nature’s way when the heart beating will stop, no machine can help. That is not possible.
Girirāja: So the doctors face a dilemma, that they keep the heart going by the machine, but they don’t know whether the patient is actually living or dead. So they are afraid to stop the machine. They don’t know how to decide when to stop the machine.
Prabhupāda: But when they stop it…?
Girirāja: Then the patient is dead. (laughter)
Yaśomatīnandana: That is the modern science, so imperfect. They don’t even know whether a person is live or dead.
Prabhupāda: What do they know? They know something, but everyone knows. Even the birds and beasts, they also know something.
Girirāja: “In this way, one after another the body changes and the soul transmigrates. See how the plant worms change from one twig to another so carefully. Similarly the living entity changes his body as soon as the higher authorities decide on his next body.” [break]
Prabhupāda: …the modern civlization is that they have no knowledge about the change of body. Almost 99 percent people, they do not know.
Yaśomatīnandana: Even the so-called religions, the religions even don’t teach.
Prabhupāda: They do not know.
Girirāja: “This body is exactly like one of the bodies which we always see in dreams. During our dream of sleep we create so many bodies according to mental creation.” [break]
Prabhupāda: …the psychologically whatever mental condition we prepare throughout this life, that means you are preparing next life, and in the Bhagavad-gītā it is said, yaṁ yaṁ vāpi smaran bhāvam tyajanty ante kalevaram [Bg. 8.6]. The situation of the mind at the time of death will carry you to the similar body. Just like one who likes to eat some special foodstuff, so… Suppose the meat-eaters… So the mentality is “How to eat meat, how to eat meat.” So they are given next life the canine teeth to give facility for eating meat. Canine teeth means dogs, cats, tigers, like that.

Link to this page: https://prabhupadabooks.com/conversations/1974/apr/morning_walk/bombay/april/07/1974

Reply
Mahesh Raja says:

4. July 2020 at 5:52 pm

Latest info: Yamadutas got Bhakti Charu now: present status: he is in the custody of Yamaraja:

http://krishna1008.blogspot.com/2020/07/bhakti-charu-swami-departs.html

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Note: the question is what sort of body awaits him next: for occupying/usurping Srila Prabhupada’s Diksa Guru position, stealing disciples meant for Srila Prabhupada as per Ritvik Order July 9th 1977:

KB 64 The Story of King Nrga
At this time, Lord Krsna was present among His relatives who were members of the ksatriya class. To teach them through the exemplary character of King Nrga, He said: “Even though a ksatriya king may be as powerful as fire, it is not possible for him to usurp the property of a brahmana and utilize it for his own purpose. If this is so, how can ordinary kings, who falsely think of themselves the most powerful beings within the material world, usurp a brahmana’s property? I do not think that taking poison is as dangerous as taking a brahmana’s property. For ordinary poison there is treatment–one can be relieved from its effects; BUT IF ONE DRINKS THE POISON OF TAKING A BRAHMANA’S PROPERTY, THERE IS NO REMEDY FOR THE MISTAKE. The perfect example was King Nrga. He was very powerful and very pious, but due to the small mistake of unknowingly usurping a brahmana’s cow, he was condemned to the abominable life of a lizard. Ordinary poison affects only those who drink it, and ordinary fire can be extinguished simply by pouring water on it; but the arani fire ignited by the spiritual potency of a brahmana can burn to ashes the whole family of a person who provokes such a brahmana.” (Formerly, the brahmanas used to ignite the fire of sacrifice not with matches or any other external fire but with their powerful mantras, called arani.) “IF SOMEONE EVEN TOUCHES A BRAHMANA’S PROPERTY, HE IS RUINED FOR THREE GENERATIONS. HOWEVER, IF A BRAHMANA’S PROPERTY IS FORCIBLY TAKEN AWAY, THE TAKER’S FAMILY FOR TEN GENERATIONS BEFORE HIM AND FOR TEN GENERATIONS AFTER HIM WILL BE SUBJECT TO RUINATION. On the other hand, if someone becomes a Vaisnava or devotee of the Lord, ten generations of his family before his birth and ten generations after will become liberated.”
Lord Krsna continued: “IF SOME FOOLISH KING WHO IS PUFFED UP BY HIS WEALTH, PRESTIGE AND POWER WANTS TO USURP A BRAHMANA’S PROPERTY, IT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD THAT SUCH A KING IS CLEARING HIS PATH TO HELL; HE DOES NOT KNOW HOW MUCH HE HAS TO SUFFER FOR SUCH UNWISE ACTION. IF SOMEONE TAKES AWAY THE PROPERTY OF A VERY LIBERAL BRAHMANA WHO IS ENCUMBERED BY A LARGE DEPENDENT FAMILY, THEN SUCH A USURPER IS PUT INTO THE HELL KNOWN AS KUMBHIPAKA; NOT ONLY IS HE PUT INTO THIS HELL, BUT HIS FAMILY MEMBERS ALSO HAVE TO ACCEPT SUCH A MISERABLE CONDITION OF LIFE. A PERSON WHO TAKES AWAY PROPERTY WHICH HAS EITHER BEEN AWARDED TO A BRAHMANA OR GIVEN AWAY BY HIM IS CONDEMNED TO LIVE FOR AT LEAST 60,000 YEARS AS MISERABLY AS AN INSECT IN STOOL. THEREFORE I INSTRUCT YOU, ALL MY BOYS AND RELATIVES PRESENT HERE, DO NOT, EVEN BY MISTAKE, TAKE THE POSSESSION OF A BRAHMANA AND THEREBY POLLUTE YOUR WHOLE FAMILY. IF SOMEONE EVEN WISHES TO POSSESS SUCH PROPERTY, LET ALONE ATTEMPTS TO TAKE IT AWAY BY FORCE, THE DURATION OF HIS LIFE WILL BE REDUCED. HE WILL BE DEFEATED BY HIS ENEMIES, AND AFTER BEING BEREFT OF HIS ROYAL POSITION, WHEN HE GIVES UP HIS BODY HE WILL BECOME A SERPENT. A serpant gives trouble to all other living entities. My dear boys and relatives, I therefore advise you that even if a brahmana becomes angry with you and calls you by ill names or cuts you, still you should not retaliate. On the contrary, you should smile, tolerate him and offer your respects to the brahmana. You know very well that even I Myself offer My obeisances to the brahmanas with great respect three times daily. You should therefore follow My instruction and example. I shall not forgive anyone who does not follow them, and I shall punish him. You should learn from the example of King Nrga that even if someone unknowingly usurps the property of a brahmana, he is put into a miserable condition of life.”
Thus Lord Krsna, who is always engaged in purifying the conditioned living entities, gave instruction not only to His family members and the inhabitants of Dvaraka, but to all the members of human society.

Reply
Acsd says:

6. July 2020 at 10:03 am

Pamho agtacbsp, first month of caturmasya ki jay, we all got the tendency to forget that the karma is not free and it act in the same way I mean BCS got so many disciples but I die in helpless situation because this virus kill the most sinfu and unfortunate souls who forgot that the karma is not free to be implacate in intricate situation is part of the ugram karma we hope to be free from this ugram karma by keeping following hdg acbsp ki jay ys haribol

Reply
Mahesh Raja says:

16. July 2020 at 1:53 am

http://krishna1008.blogspot.com/2020/07/bhakti-charu-swami-in-mayapur.html

Just see! They take his COVID CONTAMINATED carcass to Mayapur for worship – just like they did with TKG( one of the main known poison giver) and Kirtanananda(pedophile). Decorate the carcass call it “samadhi” and they worship: Mode of Ignorance:

Now, it is clearly described here that those who are in the mode of passion worship and create such gods, and those who are in the mode of ignorance, in darkness, worship dead spirits. Sometimes people worship at the tomb of some dead man.

Link to this page: https://prabhupadabooks.com/bg/17/4

Reply

Speak Your Mind Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Bhakti Charu implicated in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning

Comments

Speak Your Mind Cancel reply

Hare Kṛṣṇa Mantra with Prabhupāda

PRABHUPADA'S ORIGINAL BOOKS

Recent Comments

Links

Archives

Bhakti Charu implicated in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning

Related posts:

Comments

Speak Your Mind Cancel reply

Hare Kṛṣṇa Mantra with Prabhupāda

PRABHUPADA'S ORIGINAL BOOKS

Recent Comments

Links

Archives