IRM: Does BTP vilify Sadhus?

Jan 03, 2011 — UNITED KINGDOM (IRM) — As usual the article below has been first published in the IRMs official magazine Back To Prabhupada. BTP is being distributed for free to ISKCON devotees and people interested in Srila Prabhupadas teachings worldwide. If you would like to receive BTP as well, simply send us your full name and street address via yahoo or the following email address: irm@iskconirm.com.

Also, we welcome all correspondence, so if you have any questions, comments or criticisms, please write to us via one of the two methods mentioned above.

Thank you & Hare Krishna.

spacer

Does BTP vilify sadhus?

In a course given at the Mayapur Institute for Higher Education, ISKCON GBC voted-in guru, His Holiness Jayadvaita Swami, (“JS”) launched a blistering attack on Back To Prabhupada (BTP) magazine for allegedly offending sadhus (all quotes in the tinted panels are taken from a lecture he gave in January 2007):

“WE DON’T DO IT IN PRINT! IT’S THE LAST THING YOU DO! TO PUBLISH VILIFICATION OF A SADHU? ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND? YOU DON’T DO THAT. EVER. And the Internet is worse. To publish it on the Internet for the whole world? Sadhu-ninda? And I don’t care who does it. Those Back To Prabhupada guys. Where’re they going back to? Prabhupada would be so happy that instead of publishing Back To Godhead we publish sadhu-ninda!”

This continues the usual tactic of attacking us for supposedly making “offences” because what we actually say cannot be refuted. Always note that no one is claiming that what we state is not truthful. Rather, we are criticised for the fact that such truths should not be spoken since they will offend our great sadhus. One wonders what would be the case if we actually wrote lies!

What is sadhu-ninda?

Srila Prabhupada explains the term sadhu-ninda as follows:
“A Vaisnava accepts anything favorable for executing his mission. But foolish persons, not knowing the purpose of such exalted Vaisnavas, indulge in criticizing them. That is forbidden. Since no one can understand what a Vaisnava does for the purpose of executing his mission, to criticize such a Vaisnava is the offense called sadhu-ninda.”
(Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Adi-lila, 15:22)

Clearly the mission of ISKCON, as given by Srila Prabhupada, is not to remove Srila Prabhupada and usurp his position, claiming that since he is “dead” he can no longer initiate. Such a claim would actually be sadhu-ninda, and defending Srila Prabhupada against such claims clearly is not.

Nor is pointing out that perpetrating a guru hoax in the name of Srila Prabhupada is destroying Srila Prabhupada’s mission, not executing it. Thus by the definition of sadhu-ninda given above, BTP is clearly not guilty, since we are not criticising the execution of Srila Prabhupada’s mission, but the thwarting of it via the Great Guru Hoax.

Double Standard

If, however, for the sake of argument we accept JS’s bogus definition that sadhu-ninda is stating the truth about anyone who is engaged in thwarting Srila Prabhupada’s mission, especially in print, a prominent candidate immediately comes to mind, who stated the following in print:

“32. By allowing, advocating, taking part in, perpetuating, and defending these and other forms of contamination and decay, the members of the GBC have brought the ultimate managing authority of the entire International Society for Krishna Consciousness to a state of disrepute and pollution.” (“32 Grievances against the GBC”, Jayadvaita Swami, March 5th, 1987)
[Note the above is just a sample – there are 31 other attacks against the members of the GBC!]

“FACT: ISKCON gurus have had illicit sexual intercourse with both women and men, and possibly children as well.” (Where the Ritvik People are Right, Jayadvaita Swami, January 1996)

“Remember the days of the “11 pure devotees”? And the pure devotees who came next? Remember the Rolexes and the silver plated and the swanky cars and the knock-`em-dead lunches and the closets full of kashmir sweaters? Remember how our authorized pure devotees derailed Srila Prabhupada’s society, luxuriated in its resources, lorded it over their godbrothers and godsisters, and drove so many sincere people out?

Some of these pure devotees are still with us, right on the GBC. […] Some of our North American GBC leaders now putting on the pressure for tests and investigations and justice are the same men who not long ago were playing “Krishna and the gopis” with their female disciples.” (Letter to Prithu Das, Summer 1997, Jayadvaita Swami)

As we can see JS is more than happy to criticise ISKCON gurus and GBC members in print with no less vigour than BTP!

GBC also guilty

JS’s hypocritical self-righteousness knows no bounds, for he states that even the GBC funded website, dandavats.com, should not be read:

“I’m not going to say anything about dandavats.com except that I don’t go there and I forbid my disciples to go there.”

Presumably it is because much of the information which we simply repeat in BTP is taken from official GBC sources published in places such as the above website. The falldowns of Satsvarupa and Balabhadra Das (Bhakti Ballabh Puri Goswami) are just two recent examples. As JS says, stuff published on the internet is much worse:

“And the Internet is worse. To publish it on the Internet for the whole world? Sadhu-ninda?”

Therefore, if we are filling our magazine with information about how ISKCON’s “sadhus” have thwarted Srila Prabhupada’s mission, which is repeated verbatim from the GBC, then according to JS the destination of the GBC and the IRM is the same, for as he says:

“And I don’t care who does it. Those Back To Prabhupada guys. Where’re they going back to?”

Yet JS is more than happy to accept the perks of following such persons who, according to him, must also be committing sadhu-ninda, because he was only able to become an ISKCON guru by lining up to get voted in by the same GBC he strongly criticizes, and he participates fully in ISKCON today under the same GBC’s authority.

Conclusion

a) According to the actual definition of sadhu-ninda, BTP is not guilty of committing this, but the guru hoax program is.
b) According to JS’s bogus definition of sadhu-ninda, he himself is a prime culprit.
c) According to JS, the GBC are also prime culprits in committing sadhu-ninda, but hypocritically he is still happy to loyally follow them.

So again we see the usual display of mass hypocrisy from the guru hoaxers, which is only to be expected since this is Kali-yuga, the age of hypocrisy:
“This is the age, Kali. It is called Kali. Hypocrisy, simply hypocrisy. Kali means full of hypocrisy.” (Srila Prabhupada Lecture, November 26th, 1966)

Comments

  1. Mahasana dasa says:

    Perfect article by the IRM and up to their usual standard of correctness and professionalism. This article perfectly exposes the hypocrisy of the ISKCON bogus guru structure. They are demons in the dress of sadhus and when this is pointed out, not only by the IRM but even by they themselves (i.e. JS before he sold out), then they get their kaupins all balled up in a wad.

    They are as tangled up, in their multi-layers of hypocrisy, as the conditioned souls are tangled up, in their multi layers of karma.

  2. Thanks IRM, what a great and truthful article! How Jayadvaita can be teaching such pollution in a course beggars belief! Was it simply a matter of convenience that he over looked the (so called) sadhu ninda that he himself has put into print over the years and which your great article has raised, or is his simply using the medium of a course to threaten participants and re-enforce quazi bogus guru propaganda?

Speak Your Mind

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.