From Belgrade to BACK TO PRABHUPADA | DINA-VATSALA DAS

"It was mystical! I could also understand that Krishna was speaking through Srila Prabhupada, and that he must be the dearest servant of Lord Sri Krishna to be able to undertake and so magnificently accomplish his mission."

BY: DINA-VATSALA DAS (Nis, Serbia)
I first came into contact with Krishna consciousness in 1986 when a devotee came to my apartment to sell me some of Srila Prabhupada’s books. I purchased the first and second canto of Srimad-Bhagavatam, Bhagavad-gita, and Krsna Book.

They had been unpacked for some time and then after a while I tried to read them. But I could not understand them at all. Later on in 1990 again I met a devotee who wanted to sell me some books. I told her that I already had these books and I explained to her that I did not understand these books despite several attempts to read them.

She gave me The Science of Self-Realization, which I did not have, and told me to try reading that. I did, and that’s how everything started, for now I suddenly did understand the books!

During 1990 and 1991, I was reading 5-6 hours a day, and sometimes even more. I simply Could not stop reading these books and the more I read, the more my realization, respect and love for Srila Prabhupada developed simultaneously. I had read Srila Prabhupada stating that when a devotee’s divine consciousness begins to wake up by the mercy of Lord Krishna everything takes place so beautifully that the devotee does not even know how it is happening.

And I was practically finding that this was happening to me. It was mystical! I could also understand that Krishna was speaking through Srila Prabhupada, and that he must be the dearest servant of Lord Sri Krishna to be able to undertake and so magnificently accomplish his mission.

In this way I became totally convinced about the philosophy of Krishna consciousness just by reading the books, and also began to follow all the practices. My family (wife and 3 children) also followed suit.

I next wondered where I could find devotees or whether they existed at that time in Serbia, the country I lived in. After some time devotees came from the capital, Belgrade, to my city of Nis, to perform a music concert. Contact was made with them, and my family and I then began to visit the Belgrade temple whenever we could.

In 1993 I went to India with devotees and I was fascinated. Whilst there I bought many more of Srila Prabhupada’s books and read as much as I could. During this time I was running my own taxi business, and since I had a nice large vehicle, I was given the opportunity to pick up from the airport and take to the Betgrade temple the many ISKCON gurus who would visit Serbia, such as Rohini-Suta Prabhu, Krishna-Ksetra Prabhu, Bhakti-Vaibhava Swami and Bhakti-Vikash Swami.

This became a regular service and therefore I got to know the gurus better, and attended the programs and lectures that they were giving. In 1995 there were suddenly about 15 devotees in Nis. They started to visit our house, since we had a small altar with a picture of Panca-Tattva (Lord Chaitanya and His principal associates) where we offered food and performed arati (worship). In 1996 two of my younger children got initiated by Rohini-Suta, and three days later Gaura-Nitai deities graced our altar.

At the end of that year I also got initiated, by Harikesa Swami. Ironically, my wife and eldest son, though they fully accepted the process of Krishna consciousness, did not like any of the ISKCON gurus, and therefore resisted taking initiation from any of them!
At this time I also began running a regular “Nama hatta (congregational) program in my house.

After some time I slowly started noticing strange things. Even I knew most of the answers to the questions that devotees were asking after the lectures given by the ISKCON gurus. At that time audio players called “Walkmans” were used and all the devotees were listening to their gurus’ lectures, but I noticed that hardly any devotees were reading Srila Prabhupada’s books.

It was as if they were written only for their gurus to read and not for the devotees. Later I realised that even the ISKCON gurus did not read Srila Prabhupada’s books in the right way. Another thing I noticed was that these gurus did not come to mangala arati (early morning worship), and they did not eat prasadam (sanctified food) or chant japa (rosary) rounds with the devotees.

I began to wonder how a pure devotee of Lord Krishna could be sleeping during mangala arati! This behaviour was followed by some senior devotees and sometimes by most of the devotees, meaning that sometimes only 2-3 devotees out of 80-100 devotees attended mangala-arati. With time, the standards began to degrade even more, and mangala aratis began starting as late as 9 am in the ISKCON retreats held at Fruska Gora in Serbia.

The lectures the gurus gave seemed to me somehow incomplete, and while reading Srila Prabhupada’s books made us full of enthusiasm, the preaching of the gurus made devotees sleepy, with devotees openly sleeping throughout their lectures.

Finally the fall of Harikesa Swami in 1998 led to the movement in Serbia becoming severely weakened.
It became clear to me now that the ISKCON gurus and the GBC were not qualified to do what they were doing. I consoled the disappointed devotees by telling them that only Srila Prabhupada is our guru, and if we follow the instructions that he has given, as explained in his books, we can progress spiritually.

That Srila Prabhupada is the one who will take us back home, back to Godhead, and not the present “gurus”. I asked the devotees to support me, because this was the only way to maintain the Nama-hatta.

Devotees became separated into different groups, with some leaving and some staying. In this way we managed to continue with our daily programs. However at this time, in my mind I always had the same question: “How could Srila Prabhupada authorise unqualified devotees to become ‘gurus’?” But I could not find the answer.

Later the NATO bombardment of Serbia occurred and the Belgrade temple closed and devotees were scattered in all directions. During this time myself and another devotee, Megadutha Das, continued to perform daily arati.

Later on in Nis things settled down, and the ISKCON gurus once again began visiting my Nama-hatta program. Since I was strongly insisting on reading Srila Prabhupada’s books and strictly following the rules and regulations of sadhana bhakti (regulated devotional service) they accused me of “frying devotees”.

They of course also objected to my claiming that we can take shelter of only Srila Prabhupada as our guru. The National Council that was managing ISKCON in Serbia then attempted to try and close my Nama-hatta and ban me from being in ISKCON. But this remained just their unfulfilled dream. Rather, by 2003 I myself stopped inviting gurus from visiting the Nama-hatta I was running.

By Krishna’s arrangement shortly afterwards, my eldest son who had been visiting India, came across a Back To Prabhupada magazine there, and he brought it back for us. I had heard about the ‘ritviks” in the 1990s, but we had been misled regarding what they stood for. Now I was able to see for myself what they actually claimed, without the via medium of ISKCON distorting their message.

However, as I could not read English (this article has been translated by my son), I was very keen to read The Final Order (TFO) book when it was translated into Serbian, and so I waited patiently for this. As soon as I got The Final Order I read it very carefully.

And finally I saw an answer to the question which I mentioned I had had for many years, and which had also troubled many other devotees: “How could Srila Prabhupada aurhorise unqualified devotees to become ‘gurus’?”

TFO proved that actually Srila Prabhupada had not authorised anyone to succeed him as diksha-guru for ISKCON. I saw all the evidence for the establishment of the ritvik system and everything became so clear for me now. I saw that TFO was establishing with evidence that which I had felt for some time. My dilemmas about unqualified “gurus” were now clarified, and with the last spark of any doubt dissipated, I became very steady and calm in my spiritual life.

Also by coming to know about the work of the IRM, and how they are fearlessly enlightening devotees all over the world regarding Srila Prabhupada’s true teachings, I became very happy realising that there were a lot of devotees who know the truth. I began writing to TFO’s author and BTP editor Krishnakant Prabhu and promised not just verbal support but other kinds of support, and actually I was already doing that by sending Serbian language BTP magazines to devotees in Skopje (Macedonia) and Zagreb (Croatia).

I asked them to read it carefully. When I got BTP magazine Special Issue 1 & 2 and a few copies of TFO in the Serbian language, I had sent one Final Order book to the ISKCON devotees in Belgrade. As most ISKCON temples now have a special department to fight against the ritvik system, the Belgrade devotees also had one, even though there is no temple there. So they sent one devotee to Nis to try and combat me.

He did not have the courage to visit me, but he went instead to a young grihasta (householder) couple that occasionally came to our small Nama-hatta. He had occasion to touch BTP and TFO when he was with them, and he then went and washed his hands straight away to “purify” himself.

He advised the young couple not to read BTP magazine or The Final Order book because it is prohibited for ISKCON devotees, and that if they did, they would make a real serious offense to the “lotus feet” of ISKCON’s “gurus”. Such is the ignorance and fanaticism of those who oppose Srila Prabhupada.

In Serbia with its different gurus and their disciples, I have had first hand experience that the gurus consider their disciples their own personal property, and the disciples are loyal only to them and nothing else. In this way we have as many sampradayas (lineages) in ISKCON as we have “gurus.

How then can there be harmony? Even the Yamadutas (agents of Yamaraja, the lord of death) know that if there is more than one authority for the universe, things will not take place properly. There is one authority in ISKCON but they cannot see him, it is Srila Prabhupada.

Srila Prabhupada said that one who follows his instructions is his disciple, and one who does not follow is not his disciple. By this statement ISKCON leaders and their followers are not his disciples because they have rejected Srila Prabhupada’s instructions regarding who is the guru of ISKCON and so many other things.

And those who reject the guru’s instructions become useless. In this way ISKCON is managed by people who do not have knowledge and are not his disciples.

All IRM magazines and The Final Order repeat this point again and again, fully documented with a detailed explanation. “Gurus” foolishly and stubbornly remain persistent in their ignorance, and thus shame themselves and ISKCON and Srila Prabhupada by denying themselves and the devotees who follow them, Prabhupada’s and Krishna’s mercy.

I will continue to help the ISKCON Revival Movement (IRM) in every possible way to spread the truth about the guru hoax, distributing Back To Prabhupada magazines, helping with IRM translations for the IRM Serbian website, and by personal preaching. I am also still maintaining small regular gatherings for the devotees who are in Nis.

I am grateful to all IRM devotees and Krishnakant Prabhu for everything they are doing and I am offering my humble obeisances to them.

This story is not written in order to criticize or insult someone. It is written for those of pure heart as well as for those who are misled, as I was previously. Its purpose is to present the truth and motivate devotees to take shelter of Srila Prabhupada, just like the IRM is doing.
Hare Krishna! All glories to Srila Prabhupada!

Readers are cordially invited to follow Dina-vatsala Das’s example by sending us your story of just how you came ‘Back to Prabhupada’
email: irm@iskconirm.com

website: iskconirm.com

Comments

  1. Dina-Vatsala Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

    You said: “Srila Prabhupada said that one who follows his instructions is his disciple, and one who does not follow is not his disciple.”

    This does not ring true. Please give a VedaBase reference.

    Your servant, Pratyatosa Dasa

  2. july9th says:

    If one does not observe the discipline, then he is not disciple.”
    (S.B. Lecture, 21/1/74 )

    “…unless there is discipline, there is no question of disciple. Disciple means one who follows the discipline.”
    (Morning walk, 8/3/76, Mayapur)

    When one becomes disciple, he cannot disobey the order of the spiritual master.”
    (Bg. Lecture, 11/2/75, Mexico)

    Disciple means there is no argument. Whatever the guru will say, you have to accept. That is disciple. That is final. There is no argument.”
    (Srila Prabhupada conversation 28.6.76)

    “Disciple means one who is regulated by higher authority. He is disciple. The higher authority is called the spiritual master, and the person who voluntarily submits to him for being regulated, he is called disciple.”
    (Srila Prabhupada’s lecture, 25 February, 1975

    “A disciple means who voluntarily agrees to be disciplined by the spiritual master. When one becomes disciple, he cannot disobey the order of the spiritual master. Sisya. Sisya, this word, comes from the root sas-dhatu, means “I accept your ruling.”
    (Srila Prabhupada’s lecture, 11 February, 1975)

    A disciple means one who is always following the orders of the spiritual master. So I instruct my disciples to refrain from four prohibitions, namely no eating of meat, fish or eggs, no illicit sex life, no taking of intoxication, including tea, coffee, cigarettes, etc., and no gambling. Besides that my students must chant sixteen rounds of japa-mala of Hare Krishna mantra daily. So if you are able to follow these principles without fail, then you are as good as my disciple.”
    (Srila Prabhupada Letter, August 11th, 1972)

    “That is dharma, discipline, to abide by the state laws. There must be some discipline. Similarly, to make yourself advanced in spiritual life, you must have to observe the discipline, Without discipline, it is not possible. Adau gurvasrayam. Therefore Rupa Gosvami says in his Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu that discipline means, one who observes discipline, he is called disciple.
    Everyone knows it. Disciple means one who observes discipline. If one does not observe discipline, then he is not a disciple. And one who is not a disciple, his life is chaotic. He cannot be happy. Therefore Vedas say that “You must accept a bona-fide guru and become disciplined under his instruction.””
    (Srila Prabhupada Lecture, January 21st, 1974)

    “My advice is always chant 16 rounds minimum and follow the four regulative principles. All of my disciples must agree on this point otherwise they are not my disciples. Let one live anywhere, but stick to the principles. Disagreements will continue in this material world. So one may live in a suitable place, but one must follow these five principles. My disciples must follow these principles living either in heaven or hell.”
    (Srila Prabhupada letter, February 17th, 1976)

  3. “Actions speak louder than words.” For 7 years, while Srila Prabhupada was still physically present among us, the GBC refused to follow the voting provision of his 1970 Direction of Management directive. During this time, Srila Prabhupada never once said that the GBC was bogus or that the GBC men “are not my disciples” because of this blatant example of disobedience.

    Your servant, Pratyatosa Dasa

  4. july 9th says:

    @ Pratyatosa

    On Jun 26, 2010, 4:49 pm, you raised the same points on your forum site. I replied as follows:

    According to that pinacle of ISKCON literature (lol) “Monkey on a Stick”, Sulocana says that Srila Prabhupada gave indications that the GBC were bogus.
    ” “Prabhupada considered the GBC more of a problem than a solution!” Bryant exulted.” (A Messianic Mission – Monkey on a Stick)
    Though for what ever reason, he never made a major issue of it.
    Also there are lots of things Srila Prabhupada said and did which make little to no-sense to someone. However sometimes we are blessed with the power of understanding by Srila Prabhupada’s mercy and it all fits into place.

    “Lies! Lies! Lies!” Bryant shouted. “They’re bogus! Listen to what Prabhupada said about his ‘infallible’ successors:

    ‘I appointed GBC to give me relief from management, but on the contrary, complaints and counter-complaints are coming to me. How can my brain be peaceful?’
    It’s all in this letter he wrote to Jayatirtha in 1975.

    “And listen to this letter he wrote to Pusta Krsna. ‘This fighting spirit will destroy everything, but what can I do? You American and European boys are trained up in this fighting attitude. Now put it aside and simply work cooperatively for spreading this movement all over the world.’

    “Prabhupada considered the GBC more of a problem than a solution!” Bryant exulted. “He wrote Ramesvara in 1975 saying, ‘If Tamal Krishna flies ten thousand miles to lodge some complaint against Jayatirtha, what can I do? If you leaders cannot work together, then how can you expect the others to cooperate with you?’

    And look at this letter to Karandhara:
    “I think it best if the GBC members always travel. In this way, they will avoid the propensity to sit down and plot and scheme.’

    Prabhupada foresaw all the current problems fifteen years ago. He wrote Gurudas telling him not to install telexes, because the GBC will only use them to gossip more!”

    Yuvati was amazed.
    “Sulocana, this is really incredible,” she said. “I never knew Prabhupada had all these troubles.”
    “Nobody knows,” Bryant said. “They tried to hide these letters. That obviously is why Ramesvara banned me from the BBT.”
    “What are you gonna do with all this stuff?” Yuvati asked.
    “I’m not sure yet,” Bryant said. “I’ve been too busy to think much about it.”
    That night Bryant read until his eyes were so tired that the words blurred. He put down the letters and went outside. He locked his van and walked up the dirt road that led into Bhaktivedanta Village. There were more stars in the sky than he could remember seeing. He was walking along, thinking about Prabhupada, when the revelation hit him. All at once, his life made sense. Why had he joined the
    movement? Why had he never risen to a responsible position in ISKCON? Why had he married a women whose brain was made of silly putty? Why had Kirtanananda come between them? Why was Jane divorcing him?
    Because Krishna had given him a mission. Krishna wanted him to save the movement. It was all Krishna’s plan. All meant to be.
    (A Messianic Mission – Monkey on a Stick)

    You replied that Monkey on a Stick isn’t shastra which I’m sure we all agree on.
    However you seem to have missed the point. That being the quotes which Sulocana aludes to.
    I have posted these below, this time for completeness.

    Letter to: Jayatirtha
    Johannesburg
    16 October, 1975
    75-10-16
    Berkeley
    My dear Jayatirtha das,
    Please accept my blessings. I am in due receipt of your letter dated September 28, 1975 and I have noted the contents carefully.
    There is no question of removal at the present moment. We shall sit together in Mayapur if there is any complaint against one another. At the Mayapur meeting, whatever we have decided that is good for one year. So if anything has to be done it will be decided by majority decision of the GBC. I do not wish to give any decision without the GBC’s verdict. My only grievance is that I appointed GBC to give me relief from the management but, on the contrary, complaints and counter-complaints are coming to me. Then how my brain can be peaceful. Naturally, I want to see that all of my centres are going nicely, so is it not possible to mitigate the differences of opinion and work smoothly, conjointly. So best thing is that we wait for the Mayapur meeting and decide there combinedly what to do.
    The local management has to be done by temple president, GBC should see whether management is going on nicely, and if there are any discrepancies that will be discussed at the GBC meeting in Mayapur. That is the process. Sannyasis are meant for preaching only. That is the principle. But, contrary to the principle if things are being embezzled then how can I save them. How one man can manage the whole world affairs? This is my concern.
    So far I know you are approved manager, so why complaints are there I do not know.

    Now you are my elder disciples and both of your are sannyasis and also advanced in Krsna Consciousness, so these questions should not arise amongst you again and again. That means everyone is not conscientious. These things are not new to you, why do you continually ask these questions? The GBC authority must be accepted under all circumstances, not that there will be fighting amongst you. This fighting spirit will destroy everything, but what can I do, you American and European boys are trained up in this fighting attitude. Now put it aside and simply work cooperatively for spreading this movement all over the world. The standards I have already given you, now try to maintain them at all times under standard procedure. Do not try to innovate or create anything or manufacture anything, that will ruin everything. Simply do as I am doing and be always serious and sincere to serve Krsna, and He will give you intelligence how to do everything.
    Letter to: Bali-mardana, Pusta Krsna — Los Angeles 18 September, 1972

    [..] Yes, this is wanted. I want to increase my work. Brahmananda Swami and Gopala Krishna were suggesting that I go to some other place in India, but if Tamala Krishna flies 10,000 miles to lodge some complaint against Jayatirtha what can I do? If you all leaders cannot work together, then how can you expect the others to cooperate with you? Differences may be there, but still you have to cooperate together, otherwise where is the question of my being relieved of so many problems and decisions?
    Letter to: Ramesvara: — Vrindaban 15 September, 1975

    n.b. I think it is best thing if the GBC members always travel on Sankirtana Party in their zone and go from one village to another and visit the temples to see how the students are learning and do my work. In this way, they will avoid the propensity to sit down and plot and scheme how to eat and sleep. So you can advise them all to travel extensively on Sankirtana all over their zone.
    Letter to: Karandhara — Tokyo 4 May, 1972

    The installing of telex communications for our main temples is not required. Then they will gossip more through the telex.
    Letter to: Gurudasa — Calcutta 5 February, 1977

    Ok, so he doesn’t directly say that the GBC are bogus but only a blind man would disagree that he does so indirectly.
    Just like you may find a TP in a bar drinking lager and you may humbly suggest that Prabhupada didn’t approve of this.
    The rascal will then say something like, “When did Prabhupada ever say don’t drink lager?”
    Well he didn’t directly say so but he did say no intoxication.

    btw: Just in case some reader thinks that this is a poor example since TP’s don’t go to bar’s and drink lager (even if it is non-alcoholic). A life member told me his son had just finished medical school and went out for a night on the town with his newly qualified doctor associates. To his surprise he saw the TP of his Soho St temple in the bar.. etc…

  5. dasanudas says:

    Hare Krishna Pratyatosa…

    Apart of the contradictory of yours poisonous words in your mayavadi philosophy; Srila Prabhupada is not guilty of the sin of omission, as you say and this is the proof:

    “ Letter to: All ISKCON Temple Presidents

    Sydney
    8 April, 1972

    72-04-08

    “…Under these circumstances, I AUTHORIZE YOU TO DISREGARD FOR THE TIME BEING ANY DECISION FROM THE GBC MEN UNTIL MY FURTHER INSTRUCTION.

    You manage your affairs peacefully and independently, and try to improve the spiritual atmosphere of the centers more carefully.

    I shall be very glad to know the names of your assistants such as Secretary, Treasurer and Accountant. Finally, I beg to repeat that ALL GBC ORDERS ARE SUSPENDED HEREWITH BY ME UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.

    You may reply me at ISKCON Tokyo. Hoping this meets you in very good health and advanced spiritual mood.

    Your ever well-wisher,
    A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami

    ACBS/sda ”

    WE ARE STILL WAITING FOR THIS “FURTHER INSTRUCTION.”

    This means for you, that Srila Prabhupada not was the creator of a movement of rascals.

    Haribol.

    • Dear Dasanudas Prabhu, what “poisonous words in your mayavadi philosophy” are you referring to?

      You have not proved what I said to be incorrect because the letter that you quoted was in response to an unauthorized GBC meeting in New York in early 1972. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the GBC’s disobeying the voting provision of Srila Prabhupada’s 1970 Direction of Management.

      My experience is that the very people who make a big show of being superior to everyone else are the ones whom I have described as follows on the Google Groups Prabhupadanuga forum:

      Why is it that the ones who yell the loudest, “Look at me! I’m so great! I believe everything that Srila Prabhupada said without question,” are the very ones who don’t even have enough faith in Srila Prabhupada to follow his example by having 100% of their children via natural birth at home, who don’t even have enough faith in Srila Prabhupada’s instructions to give 100% of their children a 100% gurukula/home schooled education, and who don’t even have enough faith in Srila Prabhupada’s instructions to take vanaprastha at age 50?

      (Vanaprastha means no more house and no more car, for example.)

      Do you fall into one or more of above described categories and are therefore a hypocrite?

      Your servant, Pratyatosa Dasa

Speak Your Mind

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.