Banu Swami Gives Contradictory Explanation of Diksha

Banu Swami Gives Contradictory Explanation of Diksha

Banu Swami’s “Diksha” Explanation
Carried over and lifted from PADA

PADA: Banu Swami says that diksha means to help remove and absorb the sins (ksha in diksha). OK so far. Yet his GBC “diksha gurus” are falling down left, right and center into illicit affairs. That means their gurus are not free from sin themselves.

This begs the question:

How can persons (kanisthas or even falling people) who are sinful — absorb the sins of someone else — who is sinful?

Banu says we do not emphasize diksha but we emphasize the holy name. False, anyone who rejects the GBC’s illicit sex debauchee “diksha guru” program and / or their “parampara” process is not welcome in ISKCON. Basically, the Banu guru sampradaya contains on three types of gurus: (A) debauchees, sexual predators, homosexuals, porno swamis, child molesters etc., (B) the founder fathers, apologists, defenders, cover ups of the debauchee guru process and, (C) those “2/3 show of hands” voted into that parampara process. Where is this form of guru parampara found in shastra?

We have countless testimony from ISKCON people, including ourselves, who are banned from ISKCON for rejecting their illicit sex with men, woman and children guru process. Banu says Bhagavata marg (chanting the holy name) is sufficient, so why does his program have an emphasis on getting “diksha” from persons “engaged in illicit sex with men, women and children” and / or their hand maidens, cheer leaders, or those “voted in” by this group?

And now Banu swami is part of the “editing of Srila Prabhupada’s books” committee, oh swell! The members of the illicit sex with men, women and children guru parampara, are going to re-write the Vedas? So Banu says the diksha guru is only one person, also false. ISKCON has their messiahs falling down left, right and center, and then members are being “re-initiated.” One woman we know has had four gurus, each one fell down and she went on to accept another, then another, then another. So many contradictions in his statements.

Banu swami says the shiksha guru does most of the real work, ok that means the ritvik or agent is the more important person. Banu swami says we are having managing problems because the loyalty is divided between the diksha guru and other managers. OK but he has not explained how a debauchee guru system could advise and manage the acharyas, from square one? Or where are conditioned soul managers — managing any acharyas? Where is this process described by Srila Prabhupada?

Also amazing Banu swami says that people initiated into the illicit sex with men, women and children GBC guru parampara are then eligible to do deity worship. OK so now we are going to offer bhogha to the deity, through an illicit sex guru parampara? Banu says that the second initiation is the door to worship the deity, and that means, we are training people to offer bhogha to a debauchee filled guru parampara, that buries homosexual pedophiles and porno swamis in samadhis?

Maharaja, this food is so tasty!
Was it properly offered to the illicit sex
with men, women and children guru parampara?

Banu says that his plan is to have thousands of gurus eventually, in his illicit sex with men, women and children guru parampara. Wow, so we should expand this deviation? Then he says we altered the position of the 11 to a lesser form of worship than previous diksha gurus, but where did Srila Prabhupada says we have to cut back the worship of the diksha guru and the parampara? Then he says innovation is required like Apple computer, but how can we preserve the parampara, by innovating (changing) the process, over and over?

To sum! We need to worship the guru, and that means, we have to select one from the Banu swami debauchee’s guru parampara. Told ya! ys pd

COMMENT BY LW

Dr. Spock: “Captain we have a problem. We made 80 diksha and parampara gurus. Now they are too puffed up! Won’t listen to us. We have to hold back their big worship. Make it smaller. Now we can better control them. They are lesser size acharyas. They should now listen to us managers.

“Then we ordered our acharyas should not order women into gurus. BUT they did not listen. Did that anyway. So we tried to make them smaller gurus, who would listen. They still don’t. So now we have gurus … who think they are gurus. They think they are above us … the managers. What are we going to do now?”

But none of this ever happens in the parampara. Banu admits that. He says the key is … innovating more concocted new stuff. Lets concoct more new guru rules. That means speculate … create “new rules” for acharyas. Make acharyas lesser? And they just make things up as they go along. Many GBC statements over the years … are full of this contradiction. He says there is no unity … many of these gurus don’t follow the GBC. So the whole thing is concocted. Foolishness. The guru is not following the managers? Why should the acharya follow the order from the manager?

This is just a guru business. They have no actual gurus and they know it. It is a money making guru business. A $$$ scam.