THE SO-CALLED RASCALS, THEY ARE CONCERNED WITH THE GRAMMATICAL.
720119RC.JAI – January 19, 1972, Jaipur
Room Conversation Including Discussion on SB 1.5.11
Prabhupāda: These people or this revolution is meant for killing the sinful resultant actions of the people. This revolution. Janatā agha, agha means resultant action of sinful life. Janatā agha viplavaḥ. Viplavaḥ means revolution, this very word is used. Tad-vāg-visargo janatāgha-viplavo yasmin prati-ślokam abaddhavaty api [SB 1.5.11]. Such revolutionary literature, even they are not properly composed. Yasmin prati-ślokam abaddham. Not according to the grammatical rules and other rhetorical rules, but the, I mean to say, thoughts and the effects of such revolutionary literature is required. Not the grammatical. The so-called rascals, they are concerned with the grammatical. But those who are actually worker, they are concerned with the thoughts. What is the thought is there? Therefore, it is said that tad-vāg-visargo janatāgha-viplavo yasmin prati-ślokam abaddhavaty api, nāmāny anantasya yaśo ‘nkitāni yat [SB 1.5.11]. If there is simply the attempt is there how to glorify the Supreme Lord, that is a fact. It doesn’t matter whether it is written in correct language or incorrect language, it doesn’t matter. If the whole thought is targeted to glorify the Supreme Lord, then nāmāny anantasya yaśo ‘nkitāni yat gṛṇanti gāyanti śṛṇvantisādhavaḥ. Then those who are actually sādhu, even in spite of all these defects, because the only attempt is to glorify the Lord, then those who are sādhu, those who are devotee, they hear it. Śṛṇvanti gāyanti gṛṇanti. Not only hear, they chant also the same thing. And not only chant, but gṛṇanti, they apply in their actual life. This is the Bhāgavataśloka. Is it clear now? Yes. Tad-vāg-visargo janatāgha-viplavo [SB 1.5.11]. If the thought is revolutionary for transcendental realization, even it is not properly composed from grammatical and literary point of view, because the attempt is there for glorifying the Supreme Lord, all devotees, all great sages, saintly persons, sādhavaḥ, gṛṇanti, they accept. Yes. Gṛṇanti śṛṇvanti, hear with attention, and gāyanti, and chant also. This is the principle. The only center is whether it is meant for awakening God consciousness. That is the central point, not the language(?). But it does not mean that it should not be correctly written. Correctly or incorrectly, if it is spoken by realized soul, that is important. Śṛṇvanti gāyanti. Somehow or other, if the attempt is to glorify the Supreme Lord; otherwise, if the attempt is to kill the Supreme Lord…
Just like Dr. Radhakrishnan, what is the value of such erudition? A rascal. That is called (Sanskrit), jugglery of words. It has no value. Anyone who is trying to present… Just like Aurabindo, he has no idea what is Kṛṣṇa and writing so many nonsense things. Vivekananda, he has no idea. Dr. Radhakrishnan. Rabindranath Tagore, he has no idea what is God, but he is writing Gītāñjali. That should be tested by life. Caitanya Mahāprabhuspeaking āpani ācari prabhu jīvere śikhāya, He behaves Himself perfectly and then teaches how to become a devotee. He is mad after Kṛṣṇa, He is falling down in the sea. You see? So that is wanted. And the Bhāgavata also says, sa vaipuṁsāṁ paro dharmo yato bhaktir [SB 1.2.6], how one has increased his devotion and love for Kṛṣṇa, that is the test of it. Not these formalities.
Another place Kṛṣṇa says, api cet su-durācāro bhajate mām ananya-bhāk. Even sudurācāraḥ, even not well behaved but unflinching faith in Kṛṣṇa, sādhur eva sa mantavyaḥ [Bg. 9.30], he is sādhu. Don’t consider about his misbehaviors. That is not consideration. That will be corrected. Because he has taken to Kṛṣṇa consciousness, gradually those things, those defects will be corrected. kṣipraṁ bhavati dharmātmā śaśvac-chāntiṁ nigacchati, he will become very soon a great religious soul because he has taken to Kṛṣṇa. So in the beginning if there is some defect, we should not consider that. We have to see how much his love for Kṛṣṇa has increased, that is the test. Not the formalities. That is the test, how much he has sacrificed for Kṛṣṇa, how much he is prepared to sacrifice for Kṛṣṇa. If one takes Kṛṣṇa for making business, that is different thing, that is not devotion. Śālagrāma, my Guru Maharaja used to say śālagrām bir badam hoy (?). Just like you have seen śālagrāma. So if somebody takes that and breaks peanuts, so there is no devotion. It is a show during, attracting the visitors, it is nicely decorated, but in their absence, take it and you will have stone. So all this mostly the temple show is going on like that. They have made it a show of business. The devotees will come and pay something and I may have devotion or not devotion, it doesn’t matter. One should be baccha bankaram suci (?), inside and outside perfect.
The choice is simple. Does one accept the books by the Acharya of the ISKCON Brahma Madhva Gaudiya Sampradaya and sole Diksa Guru A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada OR THE POISONER OF HIS DIVINE GRACE? That is the choice. The battle lines are there, so there is NO COMMON GROUND HERE!
Make your choice THE SPIRITUAL WORLD or HELL! There is no wiggle room for pseudo-intellectual or Masonic-academic hogwash! It is cut and dry! Black and white!
We know where these demons stand as they are “embarrassed”, yes! you heard that right “embarrassed” as Garuda Das explains:
“I would not be able to use the first edition in any serious academic fashion because of its problems, and therefore I am thankful to Jayadvaita Swami for the work he has done to make the BBT edition of the Bhagavad-gita presentable in the intellectual arena without embarrassment”.
Well this does not sound like a disciple of Srila Prabhupada! ….. He’s embarrassed! Oh dear!!!!!!!!!
NOT EMBARRASSED HOWEVER TO PRESENT THE WORK OF A POISONER OF SRILA PRABHUPADA!
NOT EMBARRASSED TO PRAISE AND GLORIFY SUCH A FOUL ENVIOUS RASCAL, THAT OVER A PERIOD OF AT LEAST 9 MONTHS ADMINISTERED LETHAL POISON TO TRY TO DESTROY THE VAPU (BODY) OF SRILA PRABHUPADA.
NOT EMBARRASSED TO GLORIFY ONE WHO HELPED POISON HIS OWN GURU!
NOT EMBARRASSED BY VALIDATING CHANGING THE ACHARYAS WORDS AGAINST THE THE ACCEPTED VAISNAVA PRINCIPALS (ARSHA PRYOGA).
NOT EMBARRASSED AT GLORIFYING ONE WHO HAS DEFIED AND CONTINUES TO DEFY HIS OWN GURU!
NOT EMBARRASSED TO GLORIFY ONE WHO WANTS TO DESTROY LORD SRI KRISHNA’S OWN VANI AS IT WAS SPOKEN TO HIS PURE DEVOTEE HIS DIVINE GRACE A.C. BHAKTIVEDANTA SWAMI SRILA PRABHUPADA!
Garuda Das should be embarrassed to call himself a devotee, for praising a wretch and envious reprobate such as Jayadvaita Jew-Das who not only poisoned/s the Vapu of Srila Prabhupada but continues his serpent-like venomous assault of Srila Prabhupada’s (Lord Sri Krishna’s) Vani.
Shame on you! and all of the venomous enablers who claim ‘neutrality!’ These persons are the vilest scum!
Pamho agtacbsp, mind your own business and that’s hearing the thought and the meditation on the KRSNA KATHA as the best medicine in the way out from this sick world which is a global mental health hospital,everyone is ready to exploit especially the miserable envious they just live in this miserable world to make nasty changes by forgetting the rapid spiritual progress coming from sravana, smarana and diyana in saving us from this samsara davanala one must study the own self without interfere with the business of others living entity because SRI KRSNA IS NOT A ORDINARY LIVING ENTITY and as the parambrahaman HE will punish all the exploiters who trying to have SITA DEVI WITHOUT LORD RAMA they are all dead like ravana their same false ego will kill them because SRI KRSNA IS THE PURE REFLECTION OF ANY IMAGE therefore all that disconnected from the supreme image die alone in his miserable and envious crap.agtacbsp ys haribol